Audiology seminars

Comprehending speech under acoustically challenging conditions is an everyday task that we can often execute with ease. However, accomplishing this requires the engagement of cognitive resources, such as auditory attention and working memory. The mechanisms that contribute to the robustness of speech comprehension are of substantial interest in the context of hearing mild to moderate hearing impairment, in which affected individuals typically report specific difficulties in understanding speech in background noise. Although hearing aids can help to mitigate this, they do not represent a universal solution, thus, finding alternative interventions is necessary. Given that age-related hearing loss (“presbycusis”) is inevitable, developing new approaches is all the more important in the context of aging populations. Moreover, untreated hearing loss in middle age has been identified as the most significant potentially modifiable predictor of dementia in later life. I will present research that has used a multi-methodological approach (fMRI, EEG, MEG and non-invasive brain stimulation) to try to elucidate the mechanisms that comprise the cognitive “last mile” in speech acousticallychallenging speech comprehension and to find ways to enhance them.

Previous studies have shown that blind individuals outperform sighted controls in a variety of auditory tasks; however, only few studies have investigated blind listeners’ speaker identification abilities. In addition, existing studies in the area show conflicting results. The presented empirical investigation with 153 blind (74 of them congenitally blind) and 153 sighted listeners is the first of its kind and scale in which long-term memory effects of blind listeners’ speaker identification abilities are examined. For the empirical investigation, all listeners were evenly assigned to one of nine subgroups (3 x 3 design) in order to investigate the influence of two parameters with three levels, respectively, on blind and sighted listeners’ speaker identification performance. The parameters were a) time interval; i.e. a time interval of 1, 3 or 6 weeks between the first exposure to the voice to be recognised (familiarisation) and the speaker identification task (voice lineup); and b) signal quality; i.e. voice recordings were presented in either studio-quality, mobile phone-quality or as recordings of whispered speech. Half of the presented voice lineups were target-present lineups in which the previously heard target voice was included. The other half consisted of target-absent lineups which contained solely distractor voices. Blind individuals outperformed sighted listeners only under studio quality conditions. Furthermore, for blind and sighted listeners no significant performance differences were found with regard to the three investigated time intervals of 1, 3 and 6 weeks. Blind as well as sighted listeners were significantly better at picking the target voice from target-present lineups than at indicating that the target voice was absent in target-absent lineups. Within the blind group, no significant correlations were found between identification performance and onset or duration of blindness. Implications for the field of forensic phonetics are discussed.