Every movement we make requires us to precisely coordinate muscle activity across our body in space and time. In this talk I will describe our efforts to understand how the brain generates flexible, coordinated movement. We have taken a behavior-centric approach to this problem, starting with the development of quantitative frameworks for mouse locomotion (LocoMouse; Machado et al., eLife 2015, 2020) and locomotor learning, in which mice adapt their locomotor symmetry in response to environmental perturbations (Darmohray et al., Neuron 2019). Combined with genetic circuit dissection, these studies reveal specific, cerebellum-dependent features of these complex, whole-body behaviors. This provides a key entry point for understanding how neural computations within the highly stereotyped cerebellar circuit support the precise coordination of muscle activity in space and time. Finally, I will present recent unpublished data that provide surprising insights into how cerebellar circuits flexibly coordinate whole-body movements in dynamic environments.

My group pioneered the development of a novel intracortical brain computer interface (iBCI) that decodes muscle activity (EMG) from signals recorded in the motor cortex of animals. We use these synthetic EMG signals to control Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), which causes the muscles to contract and thereby restores rudimentary voluntary control of the paralyzed limb. In the past few years, there has been much interest in the fact that information from the millions of neurons active during movement can be reduced to a small number of “latent” signals in a low-dimensional manifold computed from the multiple neuron recordings. These signals can be used to provide a stable prediction of the animal’s behavior over many months-long periods, and they may also provide the means to implement methods of transfer learning across individuals, an application that could be of particular importance for paralyzed human users. We have begun to examine the representation within this latent space, of a broad range of behaviors, including well-learned, stereotyped movements in the lab, and more natural movements in the animal’s home cage, meant to better represent a person’s daily activities. We intend to develop an FES-based iBCI that will restore voluntary movement across a broad range of motor tasks without need for intermittent recalibration. However, the nonlinearities and context dependence within this low-dimensional manifold present significant challenges.

A central question in motor physiology has been whether motor cortex activity resembles muscle activity, and if not, why not? Over fifty years, extensive observations have failed to provide a concise answer, and the topic remains much debated. To provide a different perspective, we employed a novel behavioral paradigm that affords extensive comparison between time-evolving neural and muscle activity. Single motor-cortex neurons displayed many muscle-like properties, but the structure of population activity was not muscle-like. Unlike muscle activity, neural activity was structured to avoid ’trajectory tangling’: moments where similar activity patterns led to dissimilar future patterns. Avoidance of trajectory tangling was present across tasks and species. Network models revealed a potential reason for this consistent feature: low tangling confers noise robustness. Remarkably, we were able to predict motor cortex activity from muscle activity alone, by leveraging the hypothesis that muscle-like commands are embedded in additional structure that yields low tangling. Our results argue that motor cortex embeds descending commands in additional structure that ensure low tangling, and thus noise-robustness. The dominant structure in motor cortex may thus serve not a representational function (encoding specific variables) but a computational function: ensuring that outgoing commands can be generated reliably. Our results establish the utility of an emerging approach: understanding the structure of neural activity based on properties of population geometry that flow from normative principles such as noise robustness.

Hydra is a fascinating model organism for neuroscience. It is transparent; new genetic lines allow one to image activity in both neurons (Dupre and Yuste, 2017) and muscle cells (Szymanski and Yuste, 2019) ; it exhibits rich behavior, and it continually rebuilds itself. Hydra’s fairly simply physical structure as a two-layered fluid-filled hydrostat and the accessibility of information about neural and muscle activity opens the possibility of a complete model of neural control of behavior. This requires understanding the transformations that occur in the muscle cell layers and a biomechanical model of the body column. We show that we can use this modeling to reverse engineer how neural activity drives behavior.