visual hierarchy
Latest
Kendrick Kay
The lab of Dr. Kendrick Kay at the Center for Magnetic Resonance Research at the University of Minnesota is recruiting one or more postdocs. The lab seeks to integrate broad interdisciplinary insights to understand function in the visual system. One postdoc position is on a newly funded NIH R01 to develop, design, and collect a large-scale 7T fMRI dataset that samples a wide range of cognitive tasks on a common set of visual stimuli. The project is being conducted in close collaboration with co-PI Dr. Clayton Curtis (New York University). Activities in this grant include either (i) designing, collecting, and analyzing the large-scale neuroimaging dataset, (ii) technical work focused on extending and expanding the GLMsingle analysis method, and/or (iii) other related experimental or modeling work in visual/cognitive neuroscience. Another postdoc position is aimed towards integrating fMRI and intracranial EEG measurements during visual tasks (NSD-iEEG) and electrical stimulation. The general goal of this effort is to better understand signaling across the visual hierarchy (from early visual to higher order areas ventral temporal cortex and frontal/parietal areas). This project is in collaboration with PI Dr. Dora Hermes (Mayo Clinic).
A sense without sensors: how non-temporal stimulus features influence the perception and the neural representation of time
Any sensory experience of the world, from the touch of a caress to the smile on our friend’s face, is embedded in time and it is often associated with the perception of the flow of it. The perception of time is therefore a peculiar sensory experience built without dedicated sensors. How the perception of time and the content of a sensory experience interact to give rise to this unique percept is unclear. A few empirical evidences show the existence of this interaction, for example the speed of a moving object or the number of items displayed on a computer screen can bias the perceived duration of those objects. However, to what extent the coding of time is embedded within the coding of the stimulus itself, is sustained by the activity of the same or distinct neural populations and subserved by similar or distinct neural mechanisms is far from clear. Addressing these puzzles represents a way to gain insight on the mechanism(s) through which the brain represents the passage of time. In my talk I will present behavioral and neuroimaging studies to show how concurrent changes of visual stimulus duration, speed, visual contrast and numerosity, shape and modulate brain’s and pupil’s responses and, in case of numerosity and time, influence the topographic organization of these features along the cortical visual hierarchy.
On the contributions of retinal direction selectivity to cortical motion processing in mice
Cells preferentially responding to visual motion in a particular direction are said to be direction-selective, and these were first identified in the primary visual cortex. Since then, direction-selective responses have been observed in the retina of several species, including mice, indicating motion analysis begins at the earliest stage of the visual hierarchy. Yet little is known about how retinal direction selectivity contributes to motion processing in the visual cortex. In this talk, I will present our experimental efforts to narrow this gap in our knowledge. To this end, we used genetic approaches to disrupt direction selectivity in the retina and mapped neuronal responses to visual motion in the visual cortex of mice using intrinsic signal optical imaging and two-photon calcium imaging. In essence, our work demonstrates that direction selectivity computed at the level of the retina causally serves to establish specialized motion responses in distinct areas of the mouse visual cortex. This finding thus compels us to revisit our notions of how the brain builds complex visual representations and underscores the importance of the processing performed in the periphery of sensory systems.
Top-down Modulation in Human Visual Cortex
Human vision flaunts a remarkable ability to recognize objects in the surrounding environment even in the absence of complete visual representation of these objects. This process is done almost intuitively and it was not until scientists had to tackle this problem in computer vision that they noticed its complexity. While current advances in artificial vision systems have made great strides exceeding human level in normal vision tasks, it has yet to achieve a similar robustness level. One cause of this robustness is the extensive connectivity that is not limited to a feedforward hierarchical pathway similar to the current state-of-the-art deep convolutional neural networks but also comprises recurrent and top-down connections. They allow the human brain to enhance the neural representations of degraded images in concordance with meaningful representations stored in memory. The mechanisms by which these different pathways interact are still not understood. In this seminar, studies concerning the effect of recurrent and top-down modulation on the neural representations resulting from viewing blurred images will be presented. Those studies attempted to uncover the role of recurrent and top-down connections in human vision. The results presented challenge the notion of predictive coding as a mechanism for top-down modulation of visual information during natural vision. They show that neural representation enhancement (sharpening) appears to be a more dominant process of different levels of visual hierarchy. They also show that inference in visual recognition is achieved through a Bayesian process between incoming visual information and priors from deeper processing regions in the brain.
Differential encoding of temporal context and expectation across the visual hierarchy
COSYNE 2022
Modeling the formation of the visual hierarchy
COSYNE 2022
Modeling the formation of the visual hierarchy
COSYNE 2022
Visual representation of different levels of abstraction along the mouse visual hierarchy
COSYNE 2023
Tracking the distance to criticality across the mouse visual hierarchy
COSYNE 2025
visual hierarchy coverage
9 items
Share your knowledge
Know something about visual hierarchy? Help the community by contributing seminars, talks, or research.
Contribute content