ePosterDOI Available

Set-based Fitness Comparisons - Could Neuroscientists Benefit from Engineering Studies on Conceptual Design?

Amiram Moshaiov
Bernstein Conference 2024 (2024)
Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany

Presentation

Date TBA

Poster preview

Set-based Fitness Comparisons - Could Neuroscientists Benefit from Engineering Studies on Conceptual Design? poster preview

Event Information

Abstract

Since decades ago, biologists have recognized the existence of tradeoffs in biological systems (e.g., [1]). Yet, the first study that borrowed the idea of Pareto-optimality to analyze tradeoffs in biological systems was published in 1995 [2]. In 2008, following [2], it was hypothesized in [3] that Pareto-optimality, which has been used by engineers for many years, should prove to also be significant to the understanding of natural systems. It was also argued in [3] that terminologies such as multi-objective optimization, which are associated with the Pareto principle, should be carefully revised to fit into our understanding of natural adaptation. Yet, it was probably the study in [4] that set the stage for the increasing use of Pareto-optimality by researchers on biological systems, including neuroscience researchers (e.g., [5]). Given the current numerous pieces of evidence for the suggestions in [3], it is argued here that a related issue raised in [3] should also be examined. Namely, could biologists benefit from studies on set-based conceptual designs? Here, this question will be addressed concerning neuroscience. Research on set-based conceptual design commonly deals with multi-concept multi-objective search and optimization [6]. In such studies, a conceptual solution (concept) is viewed as a solution idea that is represented by a set of particular designs that share some common features. While many of the reviewed studies in [6] have applied Pareto domination relation to support the selection of a concept, it was argued in [3, 7], that concepts should not be compared by vector-based domination, as in Pareto-optimality, but rather by set-based domination relations. Following [3] and the existing studies on set-based conceptual design, as reviewed in [6], it is argued here that neuroscience research could benefit from using the mathematical concept of set-based domination, rather than applying just vector-based domination. First, in this presentation, several set-based domination relations will be presented and discussed viz-a-viz existing Pareto-based neuroscience studies. Next, several ideas on the use of such relations for neuroscience research will be highlighted and illustrated.

Cookies

We use essential cookies to run the site. Analytics cookies are optional and help us improve World Wide. Learn more.