Neuroscience seminars
May 2025
Memory Decoding Journal Club: "Synaptic architecture of a memory engram in the mouse hippocampus
Randal A. Koene· Co-Founder and Chief Science Officer, Carboncopies
Tue, May 20 · 06:00 UTC
Synaptic architecture of a memory engram in the mouse hippocampus
Neural Signal Propagation Atlas of C. elegans
Andrew Leifer· Princeton University, US
Mon, May 19 · 15:15 UTC
In the age of connectomics, it is increasingly important to understand how the nodes and edges of a brain's anatomical network, or "connectome," gives rise to neural signaling and neural function. I will present the first comprehensive brain-wide cell-resolved causal measurements of how neurons signal to one another in response to stimulation in the nematode C. elegans. I will compare this signal propagation atlas to the worm's known connectome to address fundamental questions of structure and function in the brain.
The cellular phase of Alzheimer’s Disease and the path towards therapies
Bart De Strooper· VIB @ University of Leuven / UKDRI @ University College London
Fri, May 16 · 14:00 UTC
Neural mechanisms of rhythmic motor control in Drosophila
John Tuthill· University of Washington, Seattle, USA
Fri, May 16 · 10:30 UTC
All animal locomotion is rhythmic,whether it is achieved through undulatory movement of the whole body or the coordination of articulated limbs. Neurobiologists have long studied locomotor circuits that produce rhythmic activity with non-rhythmic input, also called central pattern generators (CPGs). However, the cellular and microcircuit implementation of a walking CPG has not been described for any limbed animal. New comprehensive connectomes of the fruit fly ventral nerve cord (VNC) provide an opportunity to study rhythmogenic walking circuits at a synaptic scale.We use a data-driven network modeling approach to identify and characterize a putative walking CPG in the Drosophila leg motor system.
Single-neuron correlates of perception and memory in the human medial temporal lobe
Prof. Dr. Dr. Florian Mormann· University of Bonn, Germany
Wed, May 14 · 16:00 UTC
The human medial temporal lobe contains neurons that respond selectively to the semantic contents of a presented stimulus. These "concept cells" may respond to very different pictures of a given person and even to their written or spoken name. Their response latency is far longer than necessary for object recognition, they follow subjective, conscious perception, and they are found in brain regions that are crucial for declarative memory formation. It has thus been hypothesized that they may represent the semantic "building blocks" of episodic memories. In this talk I will present data from single unit recordings in the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, parahippocampal cortex, and amygdala during paradigms involving object recognition and conscious perception as well as encoding of episodic memories in order to characterize the role of concept cells in these cognitive functions.
Neural mechanisms of memory linking and replay: inhibition matters
Tomoki Fukai· Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
Wed, May 14 · 15:00 UTC
My talk will consist of three subtopics. The brain remembers episodes not in isolation but with their contextual relationships, such as spatial or temporal proximity. This is an essential feature of the brain’s memory, but the underlying mechanism is yet to be explored. Cell assemblies, or engrams, may provide neural representations for such relationships. First, I will show a class of associative memory models that encode and retrieve multiple memory contents linked by an arbitrary graph structure through experience and demonstrate the crucial role of the balance between two inhibitory subnetwork types in the flexible retrieval of relational memories. Secondly, I propose a theoretical framework to generate a cognitive map, i.e., neural representations of relationships between memory items. This framework aims at the predictive function of the hippocampus and is based on successor representations proposed for reinforcement learning. Intriguingly, the model provides a unified account for grid cells in spatial navigation and concept cells in natural language processing. Finally, I will discuss another crucial role of the hippocampal memory system, memory replay, in a spiking neural network model. Unlike the conventional associative memory models that maintain attractor memory states, this model attempts to maximize the capacity of replayed activity patterns. Our model suggests the crucial role of inhibitory plasticity in optimizing spontaneous memory replay. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2025-05-14. Recording duration: 00:46:49.
Computational NeuroscienceCognition+1 moreSeries: van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience SeminarVideo
Using Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation to measure cognitive function in dementia
George Stothart· University of Bath & Cumulus Neuroscience Ltd
Wed, May 14 · 14:00 UTC
Fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS) has emerged as a promising tool for assessing cognitive function in individuals with dementia. This technique leverages electroencephalography (EEG) to measure brain responses to rapidly presented visual stimuli, offering a non-invasive and objective method for evaluating a range of cognitive functions. Unlike traditional cognitive assessments, FPVS does not rely on behavioural responses, making it particularly suitable for individuals with cognitive impairment. In this talk I will highlight a series of studies that have demonstrated its ability to detect subtle deficits in recognition memory, visual processing and attention in dementia patients using EEG in the lab, at home and in clinic. The method is quick, cost-effective, and scalable, utilizing widely available EEG technology. FPVS holds significant potential as a functional biomarker for early diagnosis and monitoring of dementia, paving the way for timely interventions and improved patient outcomes.
Understanding reward-guided learning using large-scale datasets
Kim Stachenfeld· DeepMind, Columbia U
Wed, May 14 · 13:00 UTC
Understanding the neural mechanisms of reward-guided learning is a long-standing goal of computational neuroscience. Recent methodological innovations enable us to collect ever larger neural and behavioral datasets. This presents opportunities to achieve greater understanding of learning in the brain at scale, as well as methodological challenges. In the first part of the talk, I will discuss our recent insights into the mechanisms by which zebra finch songbirds learn to sing. Dopamine has been long thought to guide reward-based trial-and-error learning by encoding reward prediction errors. However, it is unknown whether the learning of natural behaviours, such as developmental vocal learning, occurs through dopamine-based reinforcement. Longitudinal recordings of dopamine and bird songs reveal that dopamine activity is indeed consistent with encoding a reward prediction error during naturalistic learning. In the second part of the talk, I will talk about recent work we are doing at DeepMind to develop tools for automatically discovering interpretable models of behavior directly from animal choice data. Our method, dubbed CogFunSearch, uses LLMs within an evolutionary search process in order to "discover" novel models in the form of Python programs that excel at accurately predicting animal behavior during reward-guided learning. The discovered programs reveal novel patterns of learning and choice behavior that update our understanding of how the brain solves reinforcement learning problems.
Cognitive maps, navigational strategies, and the human brain
Russell Epstein· U Penn
Tue, May 13 · 16:00 UTC
Harnessing Big Data in Neuroscience: From Mapping Brain Connectivity to Predicting Traumatic Brain Injury
Franco Pestilli· University of Texas, Austin, USA
Tue, May 13 · 12:00 UTC
Neuroscience is experiencing unprecedented growth in dataset size both within individual brains and across populations. Large-scale, multimodal datasets are transforming our understanding of brain structure and function, creating opportunities to address previously unexplored questions. However, managing this increasing data volume requires new training and technology approaches. Modern data technologies are reshaping neuroscience by enabling researchers to tackle complex questions within a Ph.D. or postdoctoral timeframe. I will discuss cloud-based platforms such as brainlife.io, that provide scalable, reproducible, and accessible computational infrastructure. Modern data technology can democratize neuroscience, accelerate discovery and foster scientific transparency and collaboration. Concrete examples will illustrate how these technologies can be applied to mapping brain connectivity, studying human learning and development, and developing predictive models for traumatic brain injury (TBI). By integrating cloud computing and scalable data-sharing frameworks, neuroscience can become more impactful, inclusive, and data-driven..
Rejuvenating the Alzheimer’s brain: Challenges & Opportunities
Salta Evgenia· Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Dutch Academy of Science
Fri, May 9 · 14:00 UTC
Skin-brain axis for tactile sensations
Ishmail Abdus-Saboor· Zuckerman Mind, Brain, Behavior Institute, Columbia University, NY, USA
Fri, May 9 · 12:15 UTC
PhysiologySeries: NeuroLeman Network
Rethinking brain mechanisms in the light of evolution
Paul Cisek· University of Montreal
Thu, May 8 · 16:15 UTC
Energy efficient learning in neural networks
Mark van Rossum· University of Nottingham
Wed, May 7 · 15:00 UTC
The brain is one of the most energy intense organs. Some of this energyis used for neural information processing, however, fruitfly experiments have shown that also learning is metabolically costly. We will present estimates of this cost and introduce a general model of this cost, and compare it to costs in computers. Next, we turn to a supervised artificial network setting and explore a number of strategies that cansave energy need for plasticity. Either by modifying the objective function, by restricting plasticity, or by using less costly transient forms of plasticity. Finally, we will discuss adaptive strategies and possible relevance for biological learning. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2025-05-07. Recording duration: 00:34:58.
Computational NeuroscienceMachine LearningSeries: van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience SeminarVideo
The hippocampus, visual perception and visual memory
Morris Moscovitch· University of Toronto
Tue, May 6 · 16:00 UTC
Motor learning selectively strengthens cortical and striatal synapses of motor engram neurons
Ariel Zeleznikow-Johnston· Monash University
Tue, May 6 · 06:00 UTC
Join Us for the Memory Decoding Journal Club! A collaboration of the Carboncopies Foundation and BPF Aspirational Neuroscience. This time, we’re diving into a groundbreaking paper: "Motor learning selectively strengthens cortical and striatal synapses of motor engram neurons
Unlocking the Secrets of Microglia in Neurodegenerative diseases: Mechanisms of resilience to AD pathologies
Ghazaleh Eskandari-Sedighi· UC Irvince
Thu, May 1 · 06:00 UTC
April 2025
Dopaminergic Network Dynamics
Veronica Alvarez, Anders Borgkvist· National Institute of Mental Health resp Karolinska Institutet
Fri, Apr 25 · 16:00 UTC
Dynamical SystemsSeries: Swedish Basal Ganglia Society
Relating circuit dynamics to computation: robustness and dimension-specific computation in cortical dynamics
Shaul Druckmann· Stanford department of Neurobiology and department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Wed, Apr 23 · 15:00 UTC
Neural dynamics represent the hard-to-interpret substrate of circuit computations. Advances in large-scale recordings have highlighted the sheer spatiotemporal complexity of circuit dynamics within and across circuits, portraying in detail the difficulty of interpreting such dynamics and relating it to computation. Indeed, even in extremely simplified experimental conditions, one observes high-dimensional temporal dynamics in the relevant circuits. This complexity can be potentially addressed by the notion that not all changes in population activity have equal meaning, i.e., a small change in the evolution of activity along a particular dimension may have a bigger effect on a given computation than a large change in another. We term such conditions dimension-specific computation. Considering motor preparatory activity in a delayed response task we utilized neural recordings performed simultaneously with optogenetic perturbations to probe circuit dynamics. First, we revealed a remarkable robustness in the detailed evolution of certain dimensions of the population activity, beyond what was thought to be the case experimentally and theoretically. Second, the robust dimension in activity space carries nearly all of the decodable behavioral information whereas other non-robust dimensions contained nearly no decodable information, as if the circuit was setup to make informative dimensions stiff, i.e., resistive to perturbations, leaving uninformative dimensions sloppy, i.e., sensitive to perturbations. Third, we show that this robustness can be achieved by a modular organization of circuitry, whereby modules whose dynamics normally evolve independently can correct each other’s dynamics when an individual module is perturbed, a common design feature in robust systems engineering. Finally, we will recent work extending this framework to understanding the neural dynamics underlying preparation of speech.