Seminars

To form a coherent perception of the world around us, we are constantly processing and integrating sensory information from multiple modalities. In fact, when auditory and visual stimuli occur within ~100 ms of each other, individuals tend to perceive the stimuli as a single event, even though they occurred separately. In recent years, our lab, and others, have developed rat models of audiovisual temporal perception using behavioural tasks such as temporal order judgments (TOJs) and synchrony judgments (SJs). While these rodent models demonstrate metrics that are consistent with humans (e.g., perceived simultaneity, temporal acuity), we have sought to confirm whether rodents demonstrate the hallmarks of audiovisual temporal perception, such as predictable shifts in their perception based on experience and sensitivity to alterations in neurochemistry. Ultimately, our findings indicate that rats serve as an excellent model to study the neural mechanisms underlying audiovisual temporal perception, which to date remains relativity unknown. Using our validated translational audiovisual behavioural tasks, in combination with optogenetics, neuropharmacology and in vivo electrophysiology, we aim to uncover the mechanisms by which inhibitory neurotransmission and top-down circuits finely control ones’ perception. This research will significantly advance our understanding of the neuronal circuitry underlying audiovisual temporal perception, and will be the first to establish the role of interneurons in regulating the synchronized neural activity that is thought to contribute to the precise binding of audiovisual stimuli.

Human movement disorders and pharmacological studies have long suggested molecular dopamine modulates the pace of the internal clock. But how does the endogenous dopaminergic system influence the timing of our movements? We examined the relationship between dopaminergic signaling and the timing of reward-related, self-timed movements in mice. Animals were trained to initiate licking after a self-timed interval following a start cue; reward was delivered if the animal’s first lick fell within a rewarded window (3.3-7 s). The first-lick timing distributions exhibited the scalar property, and we leveraged the considerable variability in these distributions to determine how the activity of the dopaminergic system related to the animals’ timing. Surprisingly, dopaminergic signals ramped-up over seconds between the start-timing cue and the self-timed movement, with variable dynamics that predicted the movement/reward time, even on single trials. Steeply rising signals preceded early initiation, whereas slowly rising signals preceded later initiation. Higher baseline signals also predicted earlier self-timed movement. Optogenetic activation of dopamine neurons during self-timing did not trigger immediate movements, but rather caused systematic early-shifting of the timing distribution, whereas inhibition caused late-shifting, as if dopaminergic manipulation modulated the moment-to-moment probability of unleashing the planned movement. Consistent with this view, the dynamics of the endogenous dopaminergic signals quantitatively predicted the moment-by-moment probability of movement initiation. We conclude that ramping dopaminergic signals, potentially encoding dynamic reward expectation, probabilistically modulate the moment-by-moment decision of when to move. (Based on work from Hamilos et al., eLife, 2021).

How the brain creates a painful experience remains a mystery. Solving this mystery is crucial to understanding the fundamental biological processes that underlie the perception of body integrity, and to creating better, non-addictive pain treatments. My laboratory’s goal is to resolve the neural basis of pain. We aim to understand the mechanisms by which our nervous system produces and assembles the sensory-discriminative, affective-motivational, and cognitive-evaluative dimensions of pain to create this unique and critically important experience. To capture every component of the pain experience, we examine the entirety of the pain circuitry, from sensory and spinal ascending pathways to cortical/subcortical circuits and brainstem descending pain modulation systems, at the molecular, cellular, circuit and whole-animal levels. For these studies, we have invented novel behavioral paradigms to interrogate the affective and cognitive dimensions of pain in mice while simultaneously imaging and manipulating nociceptive circuits. My laboratory also investigates how opioids suppress pain. Remarkably, despite their medical and societal significance, how opium poppy alkaloids such as morphine produce profound analgesia remains largely unexplained. By identifying where and how opioids act in neural circuits, we not only establish the mechanisms of action of one of the oldest drugs known to humans, but also reveal the critical elements of the pain circuitry for developing of novel analgesics and bringing an end to the opioid epidemic.

Uncertainty regarding which psychological mechanisms are fundamental in mediating SSRI treatment outcomes and wide-ranging variability in their efficacy has raised more questions than it has solved. Since subjective mood states are an abstract scientific construct, only available through self-report in humans, and likely involving input from multiple top-down and bottom-up signals, it has been difficult to model at what level SSRIs interact with this process. Converging translational evidence indicates a role for serotonin in modulating context-dependent parameters of action selection, affect, and social cognition; and concurrently supporting learning mechanisms, which promote adaptability and behavioural flexibility. We examine the theoretical basis, ecological validity, and interaction of these constructs and how they may or may not exert a clinical benefit. Specifically, we bridge crucial gaps between disparate lines of research, particularly findings from animal models and human clinical trials, which often seem to present irreconcilable differences. In determining how SSRIs exert their effects, our approach examines the endogenous functions of 5-HT neurons, how 5-HT manipulations affect behaviour in different contexts, and how their therapeutic effects may be exerted in humans – which may illuminate issues of translational models, hierarchical mechanisms, idiographic variables, and social cognition.

A long-term treatment with antidepressants reduces the risk to develop AD and different second-generation antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are currently studied for their neuroprotective properties in AD. An impairment of neurotrophic factors signaling seems to be a common pathophysiological event in depression and AD. In particular a deficit of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and increased oxidative stress have been found both in depression and AD. In the present work the SSRI fluoxetine and the new multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine were tested for their ability to prevent memory deficits and depressive-like phenotype in a non-transgenic mouse model of AD (i.c.v. Aβ1-42 injection) by rescue of TGF-β1 signaling. The same drugs were also tested for their ability to modulate the expression of pro-oxidant genes as well as of genes related to the antioxidant machinery.