Seminars

Liver toxicity can emerge late in drug development when early assays fail to capture human biology, exposure or injury mechanisms. This webinar introduces Axiom’s hepatic profiling approach, combining multicellular liver systems, high-content imaging, transcriptomics, proteomics and ADME measurements. Its reasoning agent integrates those results with partner assays, chemical-series context, exposure estimates and clinical evidence to assess mechanistic liver-safety risks. Rather than using a single cell-toxicity score, the approach develops interpretable, series-specific structure–toxicity hypotheses, compares analogues, ranks compounds and suggests follow-up experiments or structural changes. Performance on established liver-injury reference compounds and newer molecules is examined through case studies, showing how multimodal evidence can inform medicinal-chemistry decisions and predicted therapeutic index.

Shantanu Jadhav presents work on coordinated hippocampal-prefrontal activity and the neural mechanisms that support memory-guided cognition and decisions. The seminar draws on systems electrophysiology and circuit analysis to connect distributed network dynamics with behavior.

Ilaria Ferlenghi discusses a career spanning structural biology, cryo-electron microscopy, vaccine research and development, and the growing role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in scientific innovation and entrepreneurship.

Deep networks are often thought of as black boxes. Their ability to encompass vast swathes of knowledge indeed makes them hard to explain. Yet many of their behaviours — generalization under overparametrization, grokking, OOD failures, neural scaling laws — recur across architectures and scales, and each, however surprising, can be reproduced and explained in controlled settings. I will review these efforts to identify and explain the universal phenomena of deep learning, and suggest that an LLM may amount to a sum of such tractable sub-phenomena, interpolative in nature. Finally, leaving scientific rigor aside, I'll argue that what separates this prosaic picture from the apparent magic of LLMs may well be the industrial scale of compute and human labour behind it, and that AGI in its deeper extrapolative sense may be much further away than claimed.

Jan Kosinski explains how AlphaFold-style methods predict protein complexes and why their reliance on evolutionary information makes interactions between host and pathogen proteins especially difficult. The talk reviews large-scale studies, interpreting both successful predictions and failures rather than treating reported success rates as universal performance. It then examines ways to improve predictions through broader sampling, altered sequence alignments and experimental restraints, including crosslinking mass spectrometry, with influenza A virus as a worked research example. The session is suitable for students and researchers interested in host-pathogen interactions and structural bioinformatics; basic knowledge of protein structures and sequence alignments is useful, but prior AlphaFold experience is unnecessary.

Robot missions require both collision-free trajectories and logical task ordering, such as collecting a resource before entering a restricted region. Augmented graphs of convex sets combine continuous trajectory optimization and discrete task sequencing in one problem. A layered graph constructed from an exact convex partition of free space selects an optimal task order and trajectory through a shortest-path calculation, exact up to finite Bézier parameterization. Its structure corresponds to Bellman–Held–Karp dynamic programming for the travelling-salesperson problem, retaining singly exponential worst-case complexity and improving exponentially on general temporal-logic tools. A library of specifications covers ordered collection, alternative keys, combined prerequisites, timing and conditional logic with correctness guarantees. Numerical benchmarks demonstrate exponential speedups and near-global optimality. Possible extensions include moving environments, safety-aware planning with conformal prediction sets and a large galactic-survey benchmark.

Yixuan He (Arizona State University) considers graph neural networks for social, financial and biological networks in which edge signs and directions contain information needed for clustering and prediction. After an introduction to graph neural networks, the talk explains how signed and directed methods preserve relationships lost when every connection is treated as unsigned and undirected. The seminar then asks when a representation learned before the final task can transfer to a different graph or to a setting with few labels. Two theoretical perspectives address transfer across graph domains and the use of link prediction for linear community detection. TopoDIG and TopoSIGN combine encoders that preserve edge structure with persistent topological features, enabling pre-training and prompt-based adaptation on directed and signed networks.

Ivo D. Dinov examines augmented intelligence as a partnership between people and computational systems. The talk traces the technical and philosophical development of neural networks, then introduces complex-time, or kime, representations and the inference methods they support. Applications include medical imaging, healthcare and economic forecasting. It also considers the academic mission, societal consequences of AI and tensions between rapid technical development and human values, framing mathematical AI methods as extensions of human reasoning. Free hybrid seminar hosted by Wayne State University's Institute for AI and Data Science, AIDaS: CAD Seminar Series. Wednesday 30 September 2026, 14:30–15:30 EDT (America/Detroit; UTC−4). Attend in Room 1146, Faculty/Administration Building, 656 W. Kirby, Detroit, MI 48202, USA, or use the Zoom link on the official event page. Researchers, practitioners, students and faculty are welcome; the organizer encourages in-person attendance.

Irene Rombel discusses how artificial intelligence and machine learning can address bottlenecks, quality issues, and production costs in cell, gene, and RNA therapy manufacturing. The seminar focuses on real-world process-development applications that improve reproducibility, speed, and cost effectiveness.

Florian Marquardt surveys approaches to reducing the energy and computational cost of neural networks by implementing their functions in physical devices. The central question is how experiments can efficiently determine updates to adjustable parameters, allowing the hardware itself to learn. Examples include learning through time reversal, obtaining nonlinear computation from linear optical scattering, and training analog quantum simulators as neuromorphic systems. The seminar is available in person and through the registration link on the organizer’s event page.

Qihao Ye examines practical, affordable ways for individual mathematicians to use AI in literature searches, proof development and verification. The talk identifies seven recurring failure modes and introduces the open-source QED multi-agent system designed to address them. A case study on constructing Carleman weights for wave equations on the half-line shows how automated search can be combined with a researcher’s mathematical insight and rigorous checking. The organizer links both the implementation and the accompanying research paper. Online via Rutgers DIMACS Zoom. Wednesday 23 September 2026, 10:00–11:00 EDT (America/New_York; UTC−4). Use the Zoom link and passcode on the official event page. Organized by the DIMACS AI and Mathematics Seminar. This listing advertises the verified remote attendance option.

ISTA Lecture by Klaus Robert Müller (TU Berlin & Korea University, Seoul) on how machine learning and AI enable scientific research, particularly in medicine and chemistry, and on explainability techniques for extracting understanding from machine learning models.

Omar M. Yaghi examines how reticular chemistry changes the scale and diversity of materials that chemists can design. By joining molecular building blocks into extended structures, researchers have developed large families of metal–organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks with tunable internal spaces and functions. The lecture asks how artificial intelligence and robotics could accelerate the preparation and exploration of these materials, moving chemical discovery from scarcity toward abundance. Yaghi connects this approach to carbon capture and the collection of water from air, building on design principles for nanoporous frameworks and their applications in gas storage and separation. The discussion extends the metal–organic framework research recognised by the 2025 Nobel Prize in Chemistry into current methods for discovery and environmental applications.

Tal Linzen, an associate professor of linguistics and data science at New York University and a research scientist at Google, will speak in MIT's Siegel Family Quest for Intelligence seminar series. His work combines behavioral experiments and computational methods to study language learning and comprehension, alongside large-language-model post-training, evaluation, and interpretability.

Zohar Ringel of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem presents a renormalisation-group approach to deep learning based on neural-network field theories. The seminar examines scaling laws, the removal of non-learnable field modes, benign overfitting and open questions about feature learning. The confirmed Quantum Matter seminar takes place in the Bob Room at Perimeter Institute on 8 September 2026, from 15:30 to 17:00 Toronto time.

Margaret Livingstone of Harvard Medical School presents in Princeton Neuroscience Institute's public seminar series. Livingstone's laboratory studies how visual recognition occurs in the primate brain using behavior, brain imaging, and electrophysiology.

Michelle M. Li examines how computational analyses can preserve the biological context of a proposed treatment, including cell type, disease state, genetic background and patient characteristics. She introduces Medea, an AI system that combines biological software, predictive models and literature retrieval while checking intermediate steps and reconciling evidence. The seminar presents evaluations involving cell-specific target selection, cancer-cell synthetic lethality and immunotherapy response. A separate yeast experiment tests predictions against previously unpublished measurements of gene-pair interactions under DNA-damaging treatments. The research addresses whether an agent can transfer useful evidence between contexts while recognizing when that transfer is unsupported. Reported comparisons cover predictive performance, computational failures and the ability to abstain. This recording retains the original seminar date.

Neural oscillations are often proposed to support brain computation by routing information, organizing cell assemblies, or shaping coding dynamics. Yet these ideas usually assume rhythms that are strong, sustained, and regular, whereas in vivo oscillations are often weak, transient, noisy, and variable in frequency and phase. In this talk, I will argue that such “no-metronome” oscillations are not just noisy fluctuations, but coordinated complex dynamics with functional consequences. Combining analyses of neural activity recordings during actual behavior (mice and non-human-primate LFPs and human EEG) with computational modelling, I will discuss evidence that transient oscillatory events can carry task-relevant information and support flexible communication through spatiotemporally structured relationships across populations, timescales, and frequencies. Together, these results suggest that oscillatory weakness and weirdness are not just imperfections, noise to average-out, but part of the functional repertoire of neural computation Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2026-05-06. Recording duration: 00:40:47.

Reward expectations – one’s prediction about the likelihood of future outcomes - play a central role in shaping the satisfaction derived from those outcomes. Most existing research treats expectations as static, assuming they remain fixed in time. However, real-life expectations are often dynamic, fluctuating as new information becomes available. For example, during a soccer game, your expectations of seeing your team winning will likely rise and fall as the game unfolds. In the main part of this talk, I will present a series of studies demonstrating that human expectations can be tracked at sub-second timescales. Using slot machines as a case study, we leverage the continuous deceleration of the reels to elicit moment-by-moment fluctuations in rewardexpectations. To capture these dynamics, we take complementary approaches: we use the high temporal resolution of electroencephalography (EEG) to track neural signatures of evolving expectations, and we develop a novel behavioral paradigm (“Slot or Not”) designed to measure changes in expectations via betting behavior. Across four studies, we show that expectations fluctuate continuously and can be tracked both behaviorally and neurally. Extending these findings, a subsequent intracranial study shows that the human orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) encodes the moment-by-moment changes of reward expectations. In the second part of this talk, I will return to the relationship between expectations andsatisfaction. If expectations shape satisfaction, and if they are best conceptualized as dynamic trajectories rather than static quantities, a key question arises: does the trajectory leading up to an outcome influence how that outcome is evaluated? I will outline a new research direction aimed at formalizing this relationship using computational modeling. This is ongoing work, and I welcome feedback on how best to formalize these ideas. Finally, I will discuss potential extensions of this framework to psychopathology, asking whether alterations in dynamic expectations may characterize conditions such as Major Depressive Disorder and Gambling disorder. Together, this work introduces a new framework for studying expectations as dynamic processes, offering a richer understanding Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2026-04-29. Recording duration: 00:42:25.

Nick Bostrom and Brian Greene examine how increasingly capable artificial intelligence challenges familiar accounts of human creativity, originality and consciousness. They discuss whether machine creativity differs fundamentally from human creativity and what evidence could bear on the possibility of subjective experience in AI systems. The conversation also considers Bostrom’s concerns about systems that recognise when they are being evaluated and change their behaviour, and the resulting difficulty of assessing alignment. It then turns to a hypothetical future in which automation removes much instrumental work: what would give human lives purpose, and would the elimination of practical problems suffice for a worthwhile life? The discussion includes education, human agency and the distinction between pleasurable simulated experience and engagement with reality.