Seminars
June 2025
Neurobiological constraints on learning: bug or feature?
Cian O’Donell· Ulster University
Wed, Jun 11 · 13:00 UTC · Online
Understanding how brains learn requires bridging evidence across scales—from behaviour and neural circuits to cells, synapses, and molecules. In our work, we use computational modelling and data analysis to explore how the physical properties of neurons and neural circuits constrain learning. These include limits imposed by brain wiring, energy availability, molecular noise, and the 3D structure of dendritic spines. In this talk I will describe one such project testing if wiring motifs from fly brain connectomes can improve performance of reservoir computers, a type of recurrent neural network. The hope is that these insights into brain learning will lead to improved learning algorithms for artificial systems.
May 2025
From neurons to Newtons: Brain evolution as a machine learning problem
Alexei Koulakov· Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Recorded
We have entered a golden age of artificial intelligence research, driven mainly by the advances in the artificial neural networks over the last several decades. Applications of these techniques—to machine vision, speech recognition, autonomous vehicles, natural language, and many other domains—are coming so quickly that many observers predict that the long-elusive goal of “Artificial General Intelligence” (AGI) is within our grasp. However, we still cannot build a machine capable of building a nest, stalking prey, or loading a dishwasher. I will describe how evolution may have shaped the algorithms that the brain is using to solve some of these challenging problems. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2025-05-21. Recording duration: 00:44:20.
Video · 44 minComputational NeuroscienceEvolutionSeries: van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar
Understanding reward-guided learning using large-scale datasets
Kim Stachenfeld· DeepMind, Columbia U
Wed, May 14 · 13:00 UTC · Online
Understanding the neural mechanisms of reward-guided learning is a long-standing goal of computational neuroscience. Recent methodological innovations enable us to collect ever larger neural and behavioral datasets. This presents opportunities to achieve greater understanding of learning in the brain at scale, as well as methodological challenges. In the first part of the talk, I will discuss our recent insights into the mechanisms by which zebra finch songbirds learn to sing. Dopamine has been long thought to guide reward-based trial-and-error learning by encoding reward prediction errors. However, it is unknown whether the learning of natural behaviours, such as developmental vocal learning, occurs through dopamine-based reinforcement. Longitudinal recordings of dopamine and bird songs reveal that dopamine activity is indeed consistent with encoding a reward prediction error during naturalistic learning. In the second part of the talk, I will talk about recent work we are doing at DeepMind to develop tools for automatically discovering interpretable models of behavior directly from animal choice data. Our method, dubbed CogFunSearch, uses LLMs within an evolutionary search process in order to "discover" novel models in the form of Python programs that excel at accurately predicting animal behavior during reward-guided learning. The discovered programs reveal novel patterns of learning and choice behavior that update our understanding of how the brain solves reinforcement learning problems.
The brain is one of the most energy intense organs. Some of this energyis used for neural information processing, however, fruitfly experiments have shown that also learning is metabolically costly. We will present estimates of this cost and introduce a general model of this cost, and compare it to costs in computers. Next, we turn to a supervised artificial network setting and explore a number of strategies that cansave energy need for plasticity. Either by modifying the objective function, by restricting plasticity, or by using less costly transient forms of plasticity. Finally, we will discuss adaptive strategies and possible relevance for biological learning. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2025-05-07. Recording duration: 00:34:58.
Video · 35 minComputational NeuroscienceMachine LearningSeries: van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar
Simulating Thought Disorder: Fine-Tuning Llama-2 for Synthetic Speech in Schizophrenia
Alban Elias Voppel· McGill University
Thu, May 1 · 06:30 UTC · Online
Natural Language ProcessingMachine LearningSeries: Canadian Neuroscience Seminars - Postdoctoral Series
April 2025
Learning generative dynamical systems models from multi-modal and multi-animal neuro-data
Daniel Durstewitz· Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim
Recorded
For decades dynamical systems theory played a pivotal role in theoretical and computational neuroscience, as it links biophysical and biochemical processes to neural computation. In fact, dynamical systems are computationally universal. Rather than hand-crafting computational theories of neural function based on dynamical systems, recent developments in scientific machine learning (ML) and AI suggest that we may be able to infer such dynamical-computational models directly from neurophysiological and behavioral observations. This is called dynamical systems reconstruction (DSR), the learning of generative surrogate models of the underlying dynamics, including its long-term temporal and geometrical properties, from time series data. In my talk I will cover recent ML/AI architectures, training algorithms, and validation procedures for DSR. I will discuss specifically how recent AI architectures for DSR can integrate neuroscience data from multiple modalities (like multiple single-unit recordings and behavioral choices), across diverse time scales, and across many different animals and task designs, into a joint DSR model. This provides first steps toward dynamical systems based AI foundation models for neuroscience. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2025-04-23. Recording duration: 00:53:24.
Video · 53 minComputational NeuroscienceDynamical SystemsSeries: van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar
March 2025
Using Machine Learning and Digital Technology to Identify Challenges and Improve Outcomes for Labor Market Transitions
Susan Athey, Bentley MacLeod, Suresh Naidu, Joseph Stiglitz· Stanford University
Recorded
Susan Athey examines how machine learning and digital interventions can help explain and improve workers’ transitions between jobs. One project uses Swedish administrative data to identify groups whose earnings and employment are less resilient after layoffs, revealing substantial differences among workers within the same firms and labour markets. A second line of work uses transformer models and large language models to represent careers and analyse gender wage gaps, identifying settings in which large unexplained differences persist. Two further projects develop and evaluate digital interventions intended to help disadvantaged workers enter expanding occupations in information technology and data science. The lecture connects new methods for measuring labour-market disadvantage with evidence about practical interventions.
Video · 1 h 37 minEconomicsArtificial IntelligenceSeries: Columbia University — Program for Economic Research and Center for Political Economy
Examining dexterous motor control in children born with a below elbow deficiency
Wilsaan Joiner· Professor, Neurobiology, Physiology & Behavior, UC Davis
Mon, Mar 10 · 19:00 UTC · Online
NeuroscienceDevelopmental Neuroscience
Constructing and deconstructing the human nervous system to study development and disease
Sergiu Pasca· Stanford University
Mon, Mar 10 · 06:00 UTC · Online
Developmental NeuroscienceNeuroscience
Regulation of cortical circuit maturation and plasticity by oligodendrocytes and myelin
Wendy Xin· UCSF
Thu, Mar 6 · 06:00 UTC · Online
Developmental NeuroscienceMolecular NeuroscienceSeries: Canadian Neuroscience Seminars - Postdoctoral Series
February 2025
Structural & Functional Neuroplasticity in Children with Hemiplegia
Christos Papadelis· University of Texas at Arlington
Fri, Feb 21 · 06:00 UTC · Online
About 30% of children with cerebral palsy have congenital hemiplegia, resulting from periventricular white matter injury, which impairs the use of one hand and disrupts bimanual co-ordination. Congenital hemiplegia has a profound effect on each child's life and, thus, is of great importance to the public health. Changes in brain organization (neuroplasticity) often occur following periventricular white matter injury. These changes vary widely depending on the timing, location, and extent of the injury, as well as the functional system involved. Currently, we have limited knowledge of neuroplasticity in children with congenital hemiplegia. As a result, we provide rehabilitation treatment to these children almost blindly based exclusively on behavioral data. In this talk, I will present recent research evidence of my team on understanding neuroplasticity in children with congenital hemiplegia by using a multimodal neuroimaging approach that combines data from structural and functional neuroimaging methods. I will further present preliminary data regarding functional improvements of upper extremities motor and sensory functions as a result of rehabilitation with a robotic system that involves active participation of the child in a video-game setup. Our research is essential for the development of novel or improved neurological rehabilitation strategies for children with congenital hemiplegia.
Brain ImagingNeuroimaging
Digital Minds: Brain Development in the Age of Technology
Eva Telzer· Winston National Center on Technology Use, Brain and Psychological Development
Mon, Feb 17 · 20:00 UTC · Online
Digital Minds: Brain Development in the Age of Technology examines how our increasingly connected world shapes mental and cognitive health. From screen time and social media to virtual interactions, this seminar delves into the latest research on how technology influences brain development, relationships, and emotional well-being. Join us to explore strategies for harnessing technology's benefits while mitigating its potential challenges, empowering you to thrive in a digital age.
PsychologyDevelopmental Neuroscience
Recent advances in techniques for monitoring and perturbing neural populations have greatly enhanced our ability to study circuits in the brain. In particular, two-photon holographic optogenetics now enables precise photostimulation of experimenter-specified groups of individual neurons, while simultaneous two-photon calcium imaging enables the measurement of ongoing and induced activity across the neural population. Despite the enormous space of potential photostimulation patterns and the time-consuming nature of photostimulation experiments, very little algorithmic work has been done to determine the most effective photostimulation patterns for identifying the neural population dynamics. Here, I will discuss ongoing development of active learning techniques to efficiently select which neurons to stimulate such that the resulting neural responses will best inform a dynamical model of the neural population activity. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2025-02-05. Recording duration: 00:42:29.
Video · 43 minComputational NeuroscienceMachine LearningSeries: van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar
December 2024
Gene regulatory mechanisms of neocortex development and evolution
Mareike Albert· Center for Regenerative Therapies, Dresden University of Technology, Germany
Thu, Dec 12 · 16:00 UTC · Online
The neocortex is considered to be the seat of higher cognitive functions in humans. During its evolution, most notably in humans, the neocortex has undergone considerable expansion, which is reflected by an increase in the number of neurons. Neocortical neurons are generated during development by neural stem and progenitor cells. Epigenetic mechanisms play a pivotal role in orchestrating the behaviour of stem cells during development. We are interested in the mechanisms that regulate gene expression in neural stem cells, which have implications for our understanding of neocortex development and evolution, neural stem cell regulation and neurodevelopmental disorders.
Rett syndrome, MECP2 and therapeutic strategies
Rudolf Jaenisch· Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Department of Biology, MIT, Cambridge, USA
Wed, Dec 11 · 12:15 UTC · Online
The development of the iPS cell technology has revolutionized our ability to study development and diseases in defined in vitro cell culture systems. The talk will focus on Rett Syndrome and discuss two topics: (i) the use of gene editing as an approach to therapy and (ii) the role of MECP2 in gene expression (i) The mutation of the X-linked MECP2 gene is causative for the disease. In a female patient, every cell has a wt copy that is, however, in 50% of the cells located on the inactive X chromosome. We have used epigenetic gene editing tools to activate the wt MECP2 allele on the inactive X chromosome. (ii) MECP2 is thought to act as repressor of gene expression. I will present data which show that MECP2 binds to Pol II and acts as an activator for thousands of genes. The target genes are significantly enriched for Autism related genes. Our data challenge the established model of MECP2’s role in gene expression and suggest novel therapeutic approaches.
2024 Nobel Prize Lectures in Chemistry
David Baker, Demis Hassabis, John Jumper· University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, USA
Recorded
David Baker, Demis Hassabis and John Jumper examine two complementary computational problems: designing proteins with desired properties and predicting the structures adopted by natural amino acid sequences. Baker describes the development of methods for creating new protein structures and functions. Hassabis discusses the use of artificial intelligence to accelerate scientific discovery, while Jumper explains the integration of chemical and biological reasoning into protein-structure prediction. The programme connects sequence, three-dimensional structure and function, and shows how computational approaches changed what researchers can attempt in protein science. It preserves the distinction between de novo design and prediction while explaining why advances in both can support biological understanding and the creation of useful molecules.
Video · 1 h 39 minStructural BiologyProtein EngineeringSeries: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
2024 Nobel Prize Lectures in Physics
John J. Hopfield, Geoffrey Hinton· Princeton University, NJ, USA
Recorded
John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton explain how ideas from physics helped establish computational models that store patterns and learn from data. Hopfield develops a physical perspective on collective computation, including associative memories in which network dynamics recover stored patterns from incomplete or distorted inputs. Hinton examines Boltzmann machines, connecting probabilistic neural networks and learning to concepts from statistical physics. Together, the lectures link energy landscapes, interacting units and stochastic behaviour with mechanisms for representation and computation. They provide the scientific background to the neural-network contributions recognised by the 2024 physics prize and the conceptual route from models of collective systems to machine learning.
SWEBAGS conference 2024: The involvement of the striatum in autism spectrum disorder
Emanuela Santini· Karolinska Institute
Thu, Dec 5 · 09:00 UTC · Online
November 2024
Decision and Behavior
Sam Gershman, Jonathan Pillow, Kenji Doya· Harvard University; Princeton University; Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
Fri, Nov 29 · 14:00 UTC · Online
This webinar addressed computational perspectives on how animals and humans make decisions, spanning normative, descriptive, and mechanistic models. Sam Gershman (Harvard) presented a capacity-limited reinforcement learning framework in which policies are compressed under an information bottleneck constraint. This approach predicts pervasive perseveration, stimulus‐independent “default” actions, and trade-offs between complexity and reward. Such policy compression reconciles observed action stochasticity and response time patterns with an optimal balance between learning capacity and performance. Jonathan Pillow (Princeton) discussed flexible descriptive models for tracking time-varying policies in animals. He introduced dynamic Generalized Linear Models (Sidetrack) and hidden Markov models (GLM-HMMs) that capture day-to-day and trial-to-trial fluctuations in choice behavior, including abrupt switches between “engaged” and “disengaged” states. These models provide new insights into how animals’ strategies evolve under learning. Finally, Kenji Doya (OIST) highlighted the importance of unifying reinforcement learning with Bayesian inference, exploring how cortical-basal ganglia networks might implement model-based and model-free strategies. He also described Japan’s Brain/MINDS 2.0 and Digital Brain initiatives, aiming to integrate multimodal data and computational principles into cohesive “digital brains.”
Sensory cognition
SueYeon Chung, Srini Turaga· New York University; Janelia Research Campus
Fri, Nov 29 · 14:00 UTC · Online
This webinar features presentations from SueYeon Chung (New York University) and Srinivas Turaga (HHMI Janelia Research Campus) on theoretical and computational approaches to sensory cognition. Chung introduced a “neural manifold” framework to capture how high-dimensional neural activity is structured into meaningful manifolds reflecting object representations. She demonstrated that manifold geometry—shaped by radius, dimensionality, and correlations—directly governs a population’s capacity for classifying or separating stimuli under nuisance variations. Applying these ideas as a data analysis tool, she showed how measuring object-manifold geometry can explain transformations along the ventral visual stream and suggested that manifold principles also yield better self-supervised neural network models resembling mammalian visual cortex. Turaga described simulating the entire fruit fly visual pathway using its connectome, modeling 64 key cell types in the optic lobe. His team’s systematic approach—combining sparse connectivity from electron microscopy with simple dynamical parameters—recapitulated known motion-selective responses and produced novel testable predictions. Together, these studies underscore the power of combining connectomic detail, task objectives, and geometric theories to unravel neural computations bridging from stimuli to cognitive functions.