The amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer disease ((Hardy and Selkoe, 2002; Hardy and Higgins, 1992; Selkoe, 1991), updated in (Karran et al., 2011) provides a linear model for the pathogenesis of AD with Aβ accumulation upstream and Tau pathology, inflammation, synaptic dysfunction, neuronal loss and dementia downstream, all interlinked, initiated and driven by Aβ42 peptides or oligomers. The genetic mutations causing familial Alzheimer disease seem to support this model. The nagging problem remains however that the postulated causal, and especially the ’driving’ role of abnormal Aβ aggregation or Aβ oligomer formation could not be convincingly demonstrated until now. Indeed, many questions (e.g. what causes Aβ toxicity, what is the relation between Aβ and Tau pathology, what causes neuronal death, why is amyloid deposition not correlated with dementia etc…) were already raised when the amyloid hypothesis was conceived 25 years ago. These questions remain in essence unanswered. It seems that the old paradigm is not tenable: the amyloid cascade is too linear, too neurocentric, and does not take into account the long time lag between the biochemical phase i.e. the appearance of amyloid plaques and neuronal tangles and the ultimate clinical phase, i.e. the manifestation of dementia. The pathways linking these two phases must be complex and tortuous. We have called this the cellular phase of AD (De Strooper and Karran, 2016) to suggest that a long period of action and reaction involving neurons, neuronal circuitry but also microglia, astroglia, oligodendrocytes, and the vasculature underlies the disease. In fact it is this long disease process that should be studied in the coming years. While microglia are part of this process, they should not be considered as the only component of the cellular phase. We expect that further clinical investigations and novel tools will allow to diagnose the effects of the cellular changes in the brain and provide clinical signs for this so called preclinical or prodromal AD. Furthermore the better understanding of this phase will lead to completely novel drug targets and treatments and will lead to an era where patients will receive an appropriate therapy according to their clinical stage. In this view anti-amyloid therapy is probably only effective and useful in the very early stage of the disease and AD does no longer equal to dementia. We will discuss in our talk how single cell technology and transplantation of human iPS cells into mouse brain allow to start to map in a systematic way the cellular phase of Alzheimer’s Disease.