In the 17th century, physician Marcello Malpighi observed the existence of distinctive patterns of ridges and sweat glands on fingertips. This was a major breakthrough, and originated a long and continuing quest for ways to uniquely identify individuals based on fingerprints, a technique massively used until today. It is only in the past few years that technologies and methodologies have achieved high-quality measures of an individual’s brain to the extent that personality traits and behavior can be characterized. The concept of “fingerprints of the brain” is very novel and has been boosted thanks to a seminal publication by Finn et al. in 2015. They were among the firsts to show that an individual’s functional brain connectivity profile is both unique and reliable, similarly to a fingerprint, and that it is possible to identify an individual among a large group of subjects solely on the basis of her or his connectivity profile. Yet, the discovery of brain fingerprints opened up a plethora of new questions. In particular, what exactly is the information encoded in brain connectivity patterns that ultimately leads to correctly differentiating someone’s connectome from anybody else’s? In other words, what makes our brains unique? In this talk I am going to partially address these open questions while keeping a personal viewpoint on the subject. I will outline the main findings, discuss potential issues, and propose future directions in the quest for identifiability of human brain networks.

Neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) of rodents are selective to the orientation of the stimulus, as in other mammals such as cats and monkeys. However, in contrast with those species, their neurons display a very different type of spatial organization. Instead of orientation maps they are organized in a “salt and pepper” pattern, where adjacent neurons have completely different preferred orientations. This structure has motivated both experimental and theoretical research with the objective of determining which aspects of the connectivity patterns and intrinsic neuronal responses can explain the observed behavior. These analysis have to take into account also that the neurons of the thalamus that send their outputs to the cortex have more complex responses in rodents than in higher mammals, displaying, for instance, a significant degree of orientation selectivity. In this talk we present work showing that a random feed-forward connectivity pattern, in which the probability of having a connection between a cortical neuron and a thalamic neuron depends only on the relative distance between them is enough explain several aspects of the complex phenomenology found in these systems. Moreover, this approach allows us to evaluate analytically the statistical structure of the thalamic input on the cortex. We find that V1 neurons are orientation selective but the preferred orientation of the stimulus depends on the spatial frequency of the stimulus. We disentangle the effect of the non circular thalamic receptive fields, finding that they control the selectivity of the time-averaged thalamic input, but not the selectivity of the time locked component. We also compare with experiments that use reverse correlation techniques, showing that ON and OFF components of the aggregate thalamic input are spatially segregated in the cortex.

Reservoir computing is a promising framework to study cortical computation, as it is based on continuous, online processing and the requirements and operating principles are compatible with cortical circuit dynamics. However, the framework has issues that limit its scope as a generic model for cortical processing. The most obvious of these is that, in traditional models, learning is restricted to the output projections and takes place in a fully supervised manner. If such an output layer is interpreted at face value as downstream computation, this is biologically questionable. If it is interpreted merely as a demonstration that the network can accurately represent the information, this immediately raises the question of what would be biologically plausible mechanisms for transmitting the information represented by a reservoir and incorporating it in downstream computations. Another major issue is that we have as yet only modest insight into how the structural and dynamical features of a network influence its computational capacity, which is necessary not only for gaining an understanding of those features in biological brains, but also for exploiting reservoir computing as a neuromorphic application. In this talk, I will first demonstrate a method for quantifying the representational capacity of reservoirs without training them on tasks. Based on this technique, which allows systematic comparison of systems, I then present our recent work towards understanding the roles of heterogeneity and connectivity patterns in enhancing both the computational properties of a network and its ability to reliably transmit to downstream networks. Finally, I will give a brief taster of our current efforts to apply the reservoir computing framework to magnetic systems as an approach to neuromorphic computing.

The success of deep learning sparked interest in whether the brain learns by using similar techniques for assigning credit to each synaptic weight for its contribution to the network output. However, the majority of current attempts at biologically-plausible learning methods are either non-local in time, require highly specific connectivity motives, or have no clear link to any known mathematical optimization method. Here, we introduce Deep Feedback Control (DFC), a new learning method that uses a feedback controller to drive a deep neural network to match a desired output target and whose control signal can be used for credit assignment. The resulting learning rule is fully local in space and time and approximates Gauss-Newton optimization for a wide range of feedback connectivity patterns. To further underline its biological plausibility, we relate DFC to a multi-compartment model of cortical pyramidal neurons with a local voltage-dependent synaptic plasticity rule, consistent with recent theories of dendritic processing. By combining dynamical system theory with mathematical optimization theory, we provide a strong theoretical foundation for DFC that we corroborate with detailed results on toy experiments and standard computer-vision benchmarks.

While time-averaged dynamics of brain functional connectivity are known to reflect the underlying structural connections, the exact relationship between large-scale function and structure remains an unsolved issue in network neuroscience. Large-scale networks are traditionally observed by correlation of fMRI timecourses, and connectivity of source-reconstructed electrophysiological measures are less prominent. Accessing the brain by using multimodal recordings combining EEG, fMRI and diffusion MRI (dMRI) can help to refine the understanding of the spatio-temporal organization of both static and dynamic brain connectivity. In this talk I will discuss our prior findings that whole-brain connectivity derived from source-reconstructed resting-state (rs) EEG is both linked to the rs-fMRI and dMRI connectome. The EEG connectome provides complimentary information to link function to structure as compared to an fMRI-only perspective. I will present an approach extending the multimodal data integration of concurrent rs-EEG-fMRI to the temporal domain by combining dynamic functional connectivity of both modalities to better understand the neural basis of functional connectivity dynamics. The close relationship between time-varying changes in EEG and fMRI whole-brain connectivity patterns provide evidence for spontaneous reconfigurations of the brain’s functional processing architecture. Finally, I will talk about data quality of connectivity derived from concurrent EEG-fMRI recordings and how the presented multimodal framework could be applied to better understand focal epilepsy. In summary this talk will give an overview of how to integrate large-scale EEG networks with MRI-derived brain structure and function. In conclusion EEG-based connectivity measures not only are closely linked to MRI-based measures of brain structure and function over different time-scales, but also provides complimentary information on the function of underlying brain organization.

Tractography datasets, calculated from dMRI, represent the main WM structural connections in the brain. Thanks to advances in image acquisition and processing, the complexity and size of these datasets have constantly increased, also containing a large amount of artifacts. We present some examples of algorithms, most of them based on classical machine learning approaches, to analyze these data and identify common connectivity patterns among subjects.

During histogenesis of the cerebral cortex, a proper laminar placement of defined numbers of specific cellular types is necessary to ensure proper functional connectivity patterns. There is a wide range of cortical malformations causing epilepsy and intellectual disability in humans, characterized with various degrees of neuronal misplacement, aberrant circuit organization or abnormal folding patterns. Although progress in human neurogenetics and brain imaging techniques have considerably advanced the identification of their causative genes, the pathophysiological mechanisms associated with defective cerebral cortex development remain poorly understood. In my presentation, I will outline some of our recent works in rodent models illustrating how misplaced neurons forming grey matter heterotopia, a cortical malformation subtype, interfere with the proper development of cortical circuits, and induce both local and distant circuitry changes associated with the subsequent emergence of epilepsy.