How can the hippocampal system transition from episodic one-shot learning to a multi-shot learning regime and what is the utility of the resultant neural representations? This talk will explore the role of the dentate gyrus (DG) anatomy in this context. The canonical DG model suggests it performs pattern separation. More recent experimental results challenge this standard model, suggesting DG function is more complex and also supports the precise binding of objects and events to space and the integration of information across episodes. Very recent studies attribute pattern separation and pattern integration to anatomically distinct parts of the DG (the suprapyramidal blade vs the infrapyramidal blade). We propose a computational model that investigates this distinction. In the model the two processing streams (potentially localized in separate blades) contribute to the storage of distinct episodic memories, and the integration of information across episodes, respectively. The latter forms generalized expectations across episodes, eventually forming a cognitive map. We train the model with two data sets, MNIST and plausible entorhinal cortex inputs. The comparison between the two streams allows for the calculation of a prediction error, which can drive the storage of poorly predicted memories and the forgetting of well-predicted memories. We suggest that differential processing across the DG aids in the iterative construction of spatial cognitive maps to serve the generation of location-dependent expectations, while at the same time preserving episodic memory traces of idiosyncratic events.

The David Smith Lectures in Anatomical Neuropharmacology, Part of the 'Pharmacology, Anatomical Neuropharmacology and Drug Discovery Seminars Series', Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford. The 15th David Smith Award Lecture in Anatomical Neuropharmacology will be delivered by Professor Tim Bliss, Visiting Professor at UCL and the Frontier Institutes of Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China, and is hosted by Professor Nigel Emptage. This award lecture was set up to celebrate the vision of Professor A David Smith, namely, that explanations of the action of drugs on the brain requires the definition of neuronal circuits, the location and interactions of molecules. Tim Bliss gained his PhD at McGill University in Canada. He joined the MRC National Institute for Medical Research in Mill Hill, London in 1967, where he remained throughout his career. His work with Terje Lømo in the late 1960’s established the phenomenon of long-term potentiation (LTP) as the dominant synaptic model of how the mammalian brain stores memories. He was elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1994 and is a founding fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences. He shared the Bristol Myers Squibb award for Neuroscience with Eric Kandel in 1991, the Ipsen Prize for Neural Plasticity with Richard Morris and Yadin Dudai in 2013. In May 2012 he gave the annual Croonian Lecture at the Royal Society on ‘The Mechanics of Memory’. In 2016 Tim, with Graham Collingridge and Richard Morris shared the Brain Prize, one of the world's most coveted science prizes. Abstract: In 1966 there appeared in Acta Physiologica Scandinavica an abstract of a talk given by Terje Lømo, a PhD student in Per Andersen’s laboratory at the University of Oslo. In it Lømo described the long-lasting potentiation of synaptic responses in the dentate gyrus of the anaesthetised rabbit that followed repeated episodes of 10-20Hz stimulation of the perforant path. Thus, heralded and almost entirely unnoticed, one of the most consequential discoveries of 20th century neuroscience was ushered into the world. Two years later I arrived in Oslo as a visiting post-doc from the National Institute for Medical Research in Mill Hill, London. In this talk I recall the events that led us to embark on a systematic reinvestigation of the phenomenon now known as long-term potentiation (LTP) and will then go on to describe the discoveries and controversies that enlivened the early decades of research into synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. I will end with an observer’s view of the current state of research in the field, and what we might expect from it in the future.

The ability to discriminate different sensory patterns by disentangling their neural representations is an important property of neural networks. While a variety of learning rules are known to be highly effective at fine-tuning synapses to achieve this, less is known about how different cell types in the brain can facilitate this process by providing architectural priors that bias the network towards sparse, selective, and discriminable representations. We studied this by simulating a neuronal network modelled on the dentate gyrus—an area characterised by sparse activity associated with pattern separation in spatial memory tasks. To test the contribution of different cell types to these functions, we presented the model with a wide dynamic range of input patterns and systematically added or removed different circuit elements. We found that recruiting feedback inhibition indirectly via recurrent excitatory neurons proved particularly helpful in disentangling patterns, and show that simple alignment principles for excitatory and inhibitory connections are a highly effective strategy.

Ever since Bliss and Lømo discovered the phenomenon of long-term potentiation (LTP) in rabbit dentate gyrus in the 1960s, Hebb’s rule—neurons that fire together wire together—gained popularity to explain learning and memory. Accumulating evidence, however, suggests that neural activity is homeostatically regulated. Homeostatic mechanisms are mostly interpreted to stabilize network dynamics. However, recent theoretical work has shown that linking the activity of a neuron to its connectivity within the network provides a robust alternative implementation of Hebb’s rule, although entirely based on negative feedback. In this setting, both natural and artificial stimulation of neurons can robustly trigger network rewiring. We used computational models of plastic networks to simulate the complex temporal dynamics of network rewiring in response to external stimuli. In parallel, we performed optogenetic stimulation experiments in the mouse anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and subsequently analyzed the temporal profile of morphological changes in the stimulated tissue. Our results suggest that the new theoretical framework combining neural activity homeostasis and structural plasticity provides a consistent explanation of our experimental observations.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI), a leading cause of acquired epilepsy, results in primary cellular injury as well as secondary neurophysiological and inflammatory responses which contribute to epileptogenesis. I will present our recent studies identifying a role for neuro-immune interactions, specifically, the innate immune receptor Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), in enhancing network excitability and cell loss in hippocampal dentate gyrus early after concussive brain injury. I will describe results indicating that the transient post-traumatic increases in dentate neurogenesis which occurs during the same early post-injury period augments dentate network excitability and epileptogenesis. I will provide evidence for the beneficial effects of targeting TLR4 and neurogenesis early after brain injury in limiting epileptogenesis. We will discuss potential mechanisms for convergence of the post-traumatic neuro-immune and neurogenic changes and the implications for therapies to reduce neurological deficits and epilepsy after brain injury.

A basic time scale in neural dynamics from single cells to the network level is the membrane time constant - set by a neuron’s input resistance and its capacitance. Interestingly, the membrane capacitance appears to be more dynamic than previously assumed with implications for neural function and pathology. Indeed, altered membrane capacitance has been observed in reaction to physiological changes like neural swelling, but also in ageing and Alzheimer's disease. Importantly, according to theory, even small changes of the capacitance can affect neuronal signal processing, e.g. increase network synchronization or facilitate transmission of high frequencies. In experiment, robust methods to modify the capacitance of a neuron have been missing. Here, we present the capacitance clamp - an electrophysiological method for capacitance control based on an unconventional application of the dynamic clamp. In its original form, dynamic clamp mimics additional synaptic or ionic conductances by injecting their respective currents. Whereas a conductance directly governs a current, the membrane capacitance determines how fast the voltage responds to a current. Accordingly, capacitance clamp mimics an altered capacitance by injecting a dynamic current that slows down or speeds up the voltage response (Fig 1 A). For the required dynamic current, the experimenter only has to specify the original cell and the desired target capacitance. In particular, capacitance clamp requires no detailed model of present conductances and thus can be applied in every excitable cell. To validate the capacitance clamp, we performed numerical simulations of the protocol and applied it to modify the capacitance of cultured neurons. First, we simulated capacitance clamp in conductance based neuron models and analysed impedance and firing frequency to verify the altered capacitance. Second, in dentate gyrus granule cells from rats, we could reliably control the capacitance in a range of 75 to 200% of the original capacitance and observed pronounced changes in the shape of the action potentials: increasing the capacitance reduced after-hyperpolarization amplitudes and slowed down repolarization. To conclude, we present a novel tool for electrophysiology: the capacitance clamp provides reliable control over the capacitance of a neuron and thereby opens a new way to study the temporal dynamics of excitable cells.

This seminar is part of our “Emergent Scientists” series, an initiative that provides a platform for scientists at the critical PhD/postdoc transition period to share their work with a broad audience and network. Summary: These talks cover Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research in both mice and humans. Christiana will discuss in particular the translational aspects of applying mouse work to humans and the importance of timing in disease pathology and intervention (e.g. timing between AD biomarkers vs. symptom onset, timing of therapy, etc.). Siddharth will discuss a rare variant of Alzheimer’s disease called “Logopenic Progressive Aphasia”, which presents with temporo-parietal atrophy yet relative sparing of hippocampal circuitry. Siddharth will discuss how, despite the unusual anatomical basis underlying this AD variant, degeneration of the angular gyrus in the left inferior parietal lobule contributes to memory deficits similar to those of typical amnesic Alzheimer’s disease. Christiana’s abstract: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a debilitating neurodegenerative disorder that causes severe deterioration of memory, cognition, behavior, and the ability to perform daily activities. The disease is characterized by the accumulation of two proteins in fibrillar form; Amyloid-β forms fibrils that accumulate as extracellular plaques while tau fibrils form intracellular tangles. Here we aim to translate findings from a commonly used AD mouse model to AD patients. Here we initiate and chronically inhibit neuropathology in lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC) layer two neurons in an AD mouse model. This is achieved by over-expressing P301L tau virally and chronically activating hM4Di DREADDs intracranially using the ligand dechloroclozapine. Biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is measured longitudinally in the model using microdialysis, and we use this same system to intracranially administer drugs aimed at halting AD-related neuropathology. The models are additionally tested in a novel contextual memory task. Preliminary findings indicate that viral injections of P301L tau into LEC layer two reveal direct projections between this region and the outer molecular layer of dentate gyrus and the rest of hippocampus. Additionally, phosphorylated tau co-localize with ‘starter cells’ and appear to spread from the injection site. Preliminary microdialysis results suggest that the concentrations of CSF amyloid-β and tau proteins mirror changes observed along the disease cascade in patients. The disease-modifying drugs appear to halt neuropathological development in this preclincial model. These findings will lead to a novel platform for translational AD research, linking the extensive research done in rodents to clinical applications. Siddharth’s abstract: A distributed brain network supports our ability to remember past events. The parietal cortex is a critical member of this network, yet, its exact contributions to episodic remembering remain unclear. Neurodegenerative syndromes affecting the posterior neocortex offer a unique opportunity to understand the importance and role of parietal regions to episodic memory. In this talk, I introduce and explore the rare neurodegenerative syndrome of Logopenic Progressive Aphasia (LPA), an aphasic variant of Alzheimer’s disease presenting with early, left-lateralized temporo-parietal atrophy, amidst relatively spared hippocampal integrity. I then discuss two key studies from my recent Ph.D. work showcasing pervasive episodic and autobiographical memory dysfunction in LPA, to a level comparable to typical, amnesic Alzheimer’s disease. Using multimodal neuroimaging, I demonstrate how degeneration of the angular gyrus in the left inferior parietal lobule, and its structural connections to the hippocampus, contribute to amnesic profiles in this syndrome. I finally evaluate these findings in the context of memory profiles in other posterior cortical neurodegenerative syndromes as well as recent theoretical models underscoring the importance of the parietal cortex in the integration and representation of episodic contextual information.

Temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with memory deficits but the circuit mechanisms underlying these cognitive disabilities are not understood. We used electrophysiological recordings, open-source wire-free miniaturized microscopy and computational modeling to probe these deficits in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy. We find desynchronization of dentate gyrus interneurons with CA1 interneurons during theta oscillations and a loss of precision and stability of place fields. We also find that emergence of place cell dysfunction is delayed, providing a potential temporal window for treatments. Computation modeling shows that desynchronization rather than interneuron cell loss can drive place cell dysfunction. Future studies will uncover cell types driving these changes and transcriptional changes that may be driving dysfunction.