Astrocytes release glutamate by regulated exocytosis in health and disease Vladimir Parpura, International Translational Neuroscience Research Institute, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, P.R. China Parpura will present you with the evidence that astrocytes, a subtype of glial cells in the brain, can exocytotically release the neurotransmitter glutamate and how this release is regulated. Spatiotemporal characteristic of vesicular fusion that underlie glutamate release in astrocytes will be discussed. He will also present data on a translational project in which this release pathway can be targeted for the treatment of glioblastoma, the deadliest brain cancer.

Astroglia-neuron interactions are involved in multiple processes, regulating development, excitability and connectivity of neural circuits. Accumulating number of evidences highlight a direct connection between aberrant astroglial genetics and physiology in various forms of epilepsies. Using zebrafish seizure models, we showed that neurons and astroglia follow different spatiotemporal dynamics during transitions from pre-ictal to ictal activity. We observed that during pre-ictal period neurons exhibit local synchrony and low level of activity, whereas astroglia exhibit global synchrony and high-level of calcium signals that are anti correlated with neural activity. Instead, generalized seizures are marked by a massive release of astroglial glutamate release as well as a drastic increase of astroglia and neuronal activity and synchrony across the entire brain. Knocking out astroglial glutamate transporters leads to recurrent spontaneous generalized seizures accompanied with massive astroglial glutamate release. We are currently using a combination of genetic and pharmacological approaches to perturb astroglial glutamate signalling and astroglial gap junctions to further investigate their role in generation and spreading of epileptic seizures across the brain.

Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity (STDP) is argued to modulate synaptic strength depending on the timing of pre- and postsynaptic spikes. Physiological experiments identified a variety of temporal kernels: Hebbian, anti-Hebbian and symmetrical LTP/LTD. In this work we present a novel plasticity model, the Voltage-Dependent Pathway Model (VDP), which is able to replicate those distinct kernel types and intermediate versions with varying LTP/LTD ratios and symmetry features. In addition, unlike previous models it retains these characteristics for different neuron models, which allows for comparison of plasticity in different neuron types. The plastic updates depend on the relative strength and activation of separately modeled LTP and LTD pathways, which are modulated by glutamate release and postsynaptic voltage. We used the 15 neuron type parametrizations in the GLIF5 model presented by Teeter et al. (2018) in combination with the VDP to simulate a range of standard plasticity protocols including standard STDP experiments, frequency dependency experiments and low frequency stimulation protocols. Slight variation in kernel stability and frequency effects can be identified between the neuron types, suggesting that the neuron type may have an effect on the effective learning rule. This plasticity model builds a middle ground between biophysical and phenomenological models allowing not just for the combination with more complex and biophysical neuron models, but is also computationally efficient so can be used in network simulations. Therefore it offers the possibility to explore the functional role of the different kernel types and electrophysiological differences in heterogeneous networks in future work.

Detection of motion is essential for survival, but how the visual system processes moving stimuli is not fully understood. Here, based on a detailed analysis of glutamate release from bipolar cells, we outline the rules that govern the representation of object motion in the early processing stages. Our main findings are as follows: (1) Motion processing begins already at the first retinal synapse. (2) The shape and the amplitude of motion responses cannot be reliably predicted from bipolar cell responses to stationary objects. (3) Enhanced representation of novel objects - particularly in bipolar cells with transient dynamics. (4) Response amplitude in bipolar cells matches visual salience reported in humans: suddenly appearing objects > novel motion > existing motion. These findings can be explained by antagonistic interactions in the center-surround receptive field, demonstrate that despite their simple operational concepts, classical center-surround receptive fields enable sophisticated visual computations.

Neocortical-hippocampal interactions during off-line periods such as slow-wave sleep are implicated in memory processing. In particular, recent memory traces are replayed in hippocampus during some sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events, and these replay events are positively correlated with neocortical memory trace reactivation. A prevalent model is that SWR arise ‘spontaneously’ in CA3 and propagate recent memory ‘indices’ outward to the neocortex to enable memory consolidation there; however, the spatiotemporal distribution of neocortical activation relative to SWR is incompletely understood. We used wide-field optical imaging to study voltage and glutamate release transients in dorsal neocortex in relation to CA1 multiunit activity (MUA) and SWR of sleeping and urethane anesthetized mice. Modulation of voltage and glutamate release signals in relation to SWRs varied across superficial neocortical regions, and it was largest in posteromedial regions surrounding retrosplenial cortex (RSC), which receives strong hippocampal output connections. Activity tended to spread sequentially from more medial towards more lateral regions. Contrary to the unidirectional hypothesis, activation exhibited a continuum of timing relative to SWRs, varying from neocortex leading to neocortex lagging the SWRs (± ~250 msec). The timing continuum was correlated with the skewness of peri-SWR hippocampal MUA and with a tendency for some SWR to occur in clusters. Thus, contrary to the model in which SWRs arise spontaneously in hippocampus, neocortical activation often precedes SWRs and may thus constitute a trigger event in which neocortical information seeds associative reactivation of hippocampal ‘indices’.