The Varela lab is expanding, and we are excited to announce a new postdoctoral position to grow our current team in the Psychology Department at Florida State University (https://varelalab.create.fsu.edu/). Start date flexible within 2024. 1-2 years with possibility of extension. About us: The Varela Laboratory is dedicated to understanding the neural underpinnings of learning and memory in rodents, with a strong focus on investigating the role of the thalamus in sleep-dependent memory consolidation. We employ a wide array of cutting-edge neuroscience techniques, including electrode recordings in freely behaving rodents, closed-loop brain activity manipulations, optogenetics, and computational approaches. *** What you get *** • Work on exciting and impactful projects aimed at understanding the role of higher-order thalamic circuits in learning and memory. • Develop research skills utilizing state-of-the-art techniques in systems, behavioral and computational neuroscience. • Receive mentorship within a supportive lab environment situated in a large, multidisciplinary department spanning work in neuroscience and psychology (https://psychology.fsu.edu/).

The Department of Psychology at Florida State University (FSU) invites applicants for a full-time tenure-track Assistant Professor position in BEHAVIORAL/SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE. Candidates with lines of laboratory animal research in any area of Neuroscience are encouraged to apply, particularly those who work to understand experience-dependent neural activity in the normal or diseased brain. Such research might include spatial navigation, decision making, and/or learning and memory. FSU is classified as a Carnegie R1 (Highest Research Activities) and ranks in the top 20 of National Public Universities (US News & World Reports). Candidates will find an outstanding research infrastructure with scientific colleagues housed in adjacent buildings, and relatively new laboratory space and vivarium. The department has a fully-staffed electronics and machine shop and faculty have access to core equipment and resources including surgical suites, a confocal microscope and common-use histology/molecular laboratory in the building and numerous other shared resources across the program facilities (see https://www.neuro.fsu.edu/rsrc/cores) and campus (e.g., 21T small animal magnet). Our department has outstanding resources, a favorable teaching load, a high level of research activity, and a collegial atmosphere. The neuroscience community across the state of Florida is also highly collaborative. More information about our department and the Program in Neuroscience can be found at www.psy.fsu.edu and www.neuro.fsu.edu. The University is in Tallahassee, the capital of Florida, where residents have access to a broad range of cultural amenities and an abundance of regional springs, lakes and rivers, and pristine beaches on the Gulf of Mexico. Faculty will be expected to maintain a strong research program, train graduate students in the Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, and have the potential for excellent teaching and mentoring of diverse student populations for undergraduate and graduate neuroscience courses in the Psychology Department. A doctoral degree is required. Applicants with a demonstrated commitment to expanding access to neuroscience through their program of research are encouraged to apply. To apply, go to http://www.jobs.fsu.edu (Job ID 58629) and submit: (1) a cover letter, (2) a curriculum vitae, (3) a research statement, (4) a teaching statement, and (5) up to four peer-reviewed papers, and (6) the names and contact information for writers for 3 letters of recommendation. Application review will begin on October 30, 2024. FSU is an Equal Opportunity/Access/Affirmative Action/Pro Disabled & Veteran Employer committed to enhancing the diversity of its faculty and students. Statement can be accessed at: https://hr.fsu.edu/sites/g/files/upcbnu2186/files/PDF/Publications/diversity/EEO_Statement.pdf. Inquiries about the position may be directed to Aaron Wilber, Search Chair, at awilber@fsu.edu.

The Department of Psychology at Florida State University (FSU) invites applicants for a full-time tenure-track Assistant Professor position in BEHAVIORAL/SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE. Candidates with lines of laboratory animal research in any area of Neuroscience are encouraged to apply, particularly those who work to understand experience-dependent neural activity in the normal or diseased brain. Such research might include spatial navigation, decision making, and/or learning and memory. FSU is classified as a Carnegie R1 (Highest Research Activities) and ranks in the top 20 of National Public Universities (US News & World Reports). Candidates will find an outstanding research infrastructure with scientific colleagues housed in adjacent buildings, and relatively new laboratory space and vivarium. The department has a fully-staffed electronics and machine shop and faculty have access to core equipment and resources including surgical suites, a confocal microscope and common-use histology/molecular laboratory in the building and numerous other shared resources across the program facilities (see https://www.neuro.fsu.edu/rsrc/cores) and campus (e.g., 21T small animal magnet). Our department has outstanding resources, a favorable teaching load, a high level of research activity, and a collegial atmosphere. The neuroscience community across the state of Florida is also highly collaborative. More information about our department and the Program in Neuroscience can be found at www.psy.fsu.edu and www.neuro.fsu.edu. The University is in Tallahassee, the capital of Florida, where residents have access to a broad range of cultural amenities and an abundance of regional springs, lakes and rivers, and pristine beaches on the Gulf of Mexico. Faculty will be expected to maintain a strong research program, train graduate students in the Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, and have the potential for excellent teaching and mentoring of diverse student populations for undergraduate and graduate neuroscience courses in the Psychology Department. A doctoral degree is required. Applicants with a demonstrated commitment to expanding access to neuroscience through their program of research are encouraged to apply. To apply, go to http://www.jobs.fsu.edu (Job ID 58629) and submit: (1) a cover letter, (2) a curriculum vitae, (3) a research statement, (4) a teaching statement, and (5) up to four peer-reviewed papers, and (6) the names and contact information for writers for 3 letters of recommendation. Application review will begin on October 30, 2024. FSU is an Equal Opportunity/Access/Affirmative Action/Pro Disabled & Veteran Employer committed to enhancing the diversity of its faculty and students. Statement can be accessed at: https://hr.fsu.edu/sites/g/files/upcbnu2186/files/PDF/Publications/diversity/EEO_Statement.pdf. Inquiries about the position may be directed to Aaron Wilber, Search Chair, at awilber@fsu.edu.

The Department of Psychology at Florida State University (FSU) invites applicants for a full-time tenure-track Assistant Professor position in BEHAVIORAL/SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE. Candidates with lines of laboratory animal research in any area of Neuroscience are encouraged to apply, particularly those who work to understand experience-dependent neural activity in the normal or diseased brain. Such research might include spatial navigation, decision making, and/or learning and memory. FSU is classified as a Carnegie R1 (Highest Research Activities) and ranks in the top 20 of National Public Universities (US News & World Reports). Candidates will find an outstanding research infrastructure with scientific colleagues housed in adjacent buildings, and relatively new laboratory space and vivarium. The department has a fully-staffed electronics and machine shop and faculty have access to core equipment and resources including surgical suites, a confocal microscope and common-use histology/molecular laboratory in the building and numerous other shared resources across the program facilities (see https://www.neuro.fsu.edu/rsrc/cores) and campus (e.g., 21T small animal magnet). Our department has outstanding resources, a favorable teaching load, a high level of research activity, and a collegial atmosphere. The neuroscience community across the state of Florida is also highly collaborative. More information about our department and the Program in Neuroscience can be found at www.psy.fsu.edu and www.neuro.fsu.edu. The University is in Tallahassee, the capital of Florida, where residents have access to a broad range of cultural amenities and an abundance of regional springs, lakes and rivers, and pristine beaches on the Gulf of Mexico.

The University of Rochester’s Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences seeks to hire an outstanding early-career candidate in the area of Human Cognition. Areas of study may center on any aspect of higher-level cognitive processes such as decision-making, learning and memory, concepts, language and communication, development, reasoning, metacognition, and collective cognition. We particularly welcome applications from candidates researching cognition in human subjects through behavioral, computational or neuroimaging methods. Successful candidates will develop a research program that establishes new collaborations within the department and across the university, and will also be part of a university-wide community engaged in graduate and undergraduate education.

This webinar on learning and memory features three experts—Nicolas Brunel, Ashok Litwin-Kumar, and Julijana Gjorgieva—who present theoretical and computational approaches to understanding how neural circuits acquire and store information across different scales. Brunel discusses calcium-based plasticity and how standard “Hebbian-like” plasticity rules inferred from in vitro or in vivo datasets constrain synaptic dynamics, aligning with classical observations (e.g., STDP) and explaining how synaptic connectivity shapes memory. Litwin-Kumar explores insights from the fruit fly connectome, emphasizing how the mushroom body—a key site for associative learning—implements a high-dimensional, random representation of sensory features. Convergent dopaminergic inputs gate plasticity, reflecting a high-dimensional “critic” that refines behavior. Feedback loops within the mushroom body further reveal sophisticated interactions between learning signals and action selection. Gjorgieva examines how activity-dependent plasticity rules shape circuitry from the subcellular (e.g., synaptic clustering on dendrites) to the cortical network level. She demonstrates how spontaneous activity during development, Hebbian competition, and inhibitory-excitatory balance collectively establish connectivity motifs responsible for key computations such as response normalization.

People largely differ with respect to how well they can learn, memorize, and perceive faces. In this talk, I address two potential sources of variation. One factor might be people’s ability to adapt their perception to the kind of faces they are currently exposed to. For instance, some studies report that those who show larger adaptation effects are also better at performing face learning and memory tasks. Another factor might be people’s sensitivity to perceive fine differences between similar-looking faces. In fact, one study shows that the brain of good performers in a face memory task shows larger neural differences between similar-looking faces. Capitalizing on this body of evidence, I present a behavioural study where I explore the relationship between people’s perceptual adaptability and sensitivity and their individual face processing performance.

Sleep strongly affects synaptic strength, making it critical for cognition, especially learning and memory formation. Whether and how sleep deprivation modulates human brain physiology and cognition is poorly understood. Here we examined how overnight sleep deprivation vs overnight sufficient sleep affects (a) cortical excitability, measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation, (b) inducibility of long-term potentiation (LTP)- and long-term depression (LTD)-like plasticity via transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and (c) learning, memory, and attention. We found that sleep deprivation increases cortical excitability due to enhanced glutamate-related cortical facilitation and decreases and/or reverses GABAergic cortical inhibition. Furthermore, tDCS-induced LTP-like plasticity (anodal) abolishes while the inhibitory LTD-like plasticity (cathodal) converts to excitatory LTP-like plasticity under sleep deprivation. This is associated with increased EEG theta oscillations due to sleep pressure. Motor learning, behavioral counterparts of plasticity, and working memory and attention, which rely on cortical excitability, are also impaired during sleep deprivation. Our study indicates that upscaled brain excitability and altered plasticity, due to sleep deprivation, are associated with impaired cognitive performance. Besides showing how brain physiology and cognition undergo changes (from neurophysiology to higher-order cognition) under sleep pressure, the findings have implications for variability and optimal application of noninvasive brain stimulation.

Sex hormones are powerful neuromodulators of learning and memory. In rodents and nonhuman primates estrogen and progesterone influence the central nervous system across a range of spatiotemporal scales. Yet, their influence on the structural and functional architecture of the human brain is largely unknown. Here, I highlight findings from a series of dense-sampling neuroimaging studies from my laboratory designed to probe the dynamic interplay between the nervous and endocrine systems. Individuals underwent brain imaging and venipuncture every 12-24 hours for 30 consecutive days. These procedures were carried out under freely cycling conditions and again under a pharmacological regimen that chronically suppresses sex hormone production. First, resting state fMRI evidence suggests that transient increases in estrogen drive robust increases in functional connectivity across the brain. Time-lagged methods from dynamical systems analysis further reveals that these transient changes in estrogen enhance within-network integration (i.e. global efficiency) in several large-scale brain networks, particularly Default Mode and Dorsal Attention Networks. Next, using high-resolution hippocampal subfield imaging, we found that intrinsic hormone fluctuations and exogenous hormone manipulations can rapidly and dynamically shape medial temporal lobe morphology. Together, these findings suggest that neuroendocrine factors influence the brain over short and protracted timescales.

The hippocampus is a key player in learning and memory. Research into this brain structure has long emphasized its plasticity and flexibility, though recent reports have come to appreciate its remarkably stable firing patterns. How novel information incorporates itself into networks that maintain their ongoing dynamics remains an open question, largely due to a lack of experimental access points into network stability. Development may provide one such access point. To explore this hypothesis, we birthdated CA1 pyramidal neurons using in-utero electroporation and examined their functional features in freely moving, adult mice. We show that CA1 pyramidal neurons of the same embryonic birthdate exhibit prominent cofiring across different brain states, including behavior in the form of overlapping place fields. Spatial representations remapped across different environments in a manner that preserves the biased correlation patterns between same birthdate neurons. These features of CA1 activity could partially be explained by structured connectivity between pyramidal cells and local interneurons. These observations suggest the existence of developmentally installed circuit motifs that impose powerful constraints on the statistics of hippocampal output.

On September 22, 2022 we will celebrate the 20th anniversary of The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory with an Exhibition Symposium — a day-long hybrid event highlighting "Two Decades of Discovery & Impact" since the launch of the Institute by a transformational gift from Barbara and Jeffry Picower. The symposium will feature a range of lay-friendly brain science talks from Picower Institute faculty and their alumni with opportunities to informally interact at lunch and at the reception that will follow the talks.

Experience-dependent transcription is a key molecular mechanisms for regulating the development and plasticity of synapses and neural circuits and is thought to underlie cognitive functions such as perception, learning and memory. After two years of COVID-pandemic, the goal of this online conference is to allow investigators in the field to reconnect and to discuss their recent scientific findings.

Nearly all motivated behaviors require the ability to associate outcomes with specific actions and make adaptive decisions about future behavior. The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is integrally involved in these processes. The NAc is a heterogeneous population primarily composed of D1 and D2 medium spiny projection (MSN) neurons that are thought to have opposed roles in behavior, with D1 MSNs promoting reward and D2 MSNs promoting aversion. Here we examined what types of information are encoded by the D1 and D2 MSNs using optogenetics, fiber photometry, and cellular resolution calcium imaging. First, we showed that mice responded for optical self-stimulation of both cell types, suggesting D2-MSN activation is not inherently aversive. Next, we recorded population and single cell activity patterns of D1 and D2 MSNs during reinforcement as well as Pavlovian learning paradigms that allow dissociation of stimulus value, outcome, cue learning, and action. We demonstrated that D1 MSNs respond to the presence and intensity of unconditioned stimuli – regardless of value. Conversely, D2 MSNs responded to the prediction of these outcomes during specific cues. Overall, these results provide foundational evidence for the discrete aspects of information that are encoded within the NAc D1 and D2 MSN populations. These results will significantly enhance our understanding of the involvement of the NAc MSNs in learning and memory as well as how these neurons contribute to the development and maintenance of substance use disorders.

Activity dependent synaptic plasticity is considered to be a primary mechanism underlying learning and memory. Yet it is unclear whether plasticity rules such as STDP measured in vitro apply in vivo. Network models with STDP predict that activity patterns (e.g., place-cell spatial selectivity) should change much faster than observed experimentally. We address this gap by investigating a nonlinear calcium-based plasticity rule fit to experiments done in physiological conditions. In this model, LTP and LTD result from intracellular calcium transients arising almost exclusively from synchronous coactivation of pre- and postsynaptic neurons. We analytically approximate the full distribution of nonlinear calcium transients as a function of pre- and postsynaptic firing rates, and temporal correlations. This analysis directly relates activity statistics that can be measured in vivo to the changes in synaptic efficacy they cause. Our results highlight that both high-firing rates and temporal correlations can lead to significant changes to synaptic efficacy. Using a mean-field theory, we show that the nonlinear plasticity rule, without any fine-tuning, gives a stable, unimodal synaptic weight distribution characterized by many strong synapses which remain stable over long periods of time, consistent with electrophysiological and behavioral studies. Moreover, our theory explains how memories encoded by strong synapses can be preferentially stabilized by the plasticity rule. We confirmed our analytical results in a spiking recurrent network. Interestingly, although most synapses are weak and undergo rapid turnover, the fraction of strong synapses are sufficient for supporting realistic spiking dynamics and serve to maintain the network’s cluster structure. Our results provide a mechanistic understanding of how stable memories may emerge on the behavioral level from an STDP rule measured in physiological conditions. Furthermore, the plasticity rule we investigate is mathematically equivalent to other learning rules which rely on the statistics of coincidences, so we expect that our formalism will be useful to study other learning processes beyond the calcium-based plasticity rule.

Ever since Bliss and Lømo discovered the phenomenon of long-term potentiation (LTP) in rabbit dentate gyrus in the 1960s, Hebb’s rule—neurons that fire together wire together—gained popularity to explain learning and memory. Accumulating evidence, however, suggests that neural activity is homeostatically regulated. Homeostatic mechanisms are mostly interpreted to stabilize network dynamics. However, recent theoretical work has shown that linking the activity of a neuron to its connectivity within the network provides a robust alternative implementation of Hebb’s rule, although entirely based on negative feedback. In this setting, both natural and artificial stimulation of neurons can robustly trigger network rewiring. We used computational models of plastic networks to simulate the complex temporal dynamics of network rewiring in response to external stimuli. In parallel, we performed optogenetic stimulation experiments in the mouse anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and subsequently analyzed the temporal profile of morphological changes in the stimulated tissue. Our results suggest that the new theoretical framework combining neural activity homeostasis and structural plasticity provides a consistent explanation of our experimental observations.

Knowing where we are, where we have been, and where we are going is critical to many behaviors, including navigation and memory. One potential neuronal mechanism underlying this ability is phase precession, in which spatially tuned neurons represent sequences of positions by activating at progressively earlier phases of local network theta oscillations. Based on studies in rodents, researchers have hypothesized that phase precession may be a general neural pattern for representing sequential events for learning and memory. By recording human single-neuron activity during spatial navigation, we show that spatially tuned neurons in the human hippocampus and entorhinal cortex exhibit phase precession. Furthermore, beyond the neural representation of locations, we show evidence for phase precession related to specific goal states. Our find- ings thus extend theta phase precession to humans and suggest that this phenomenon has a broad func- tional role for the neural representation of both spatial and non-spatial information.

The CNS is responsive to an ever-changing environment. Until recently, studies of neural plasticity focused almost exclusively on functional and structural changes of neuronal synapses. In recent years, myelin plasticity has emerged as a potential modulator of neural networks. Myelination of previously unmyelinated axons, and changes in the structure on already-myelinated axons, can have large effects on network function. The heterogeneity of the extent of how axons in the CNS are myelinated offers diverse scope for dynamic myelin changes to fine-tune neural circuits. The traditionally held view of myelin as a passive insulator of axons is now changing to one of lifelong changes in myelin, modulated by neuronal activity and experience. Myelin, produced by oligodendrocytes (OLs), is essential for normal brain function, as it provides fast signal transmission, promotes synchronization of neuronal signals and helps to maintain neuronal function. OLs differentiate from oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), which are distributed throughout the adult brain, and myelination continues into late adulthood. OPCs can sense neuronal activity as they receive synaptic inputs from neurons and express voltage-gated ion channels and neurotransmitter receptors, and differentiate into myelinating OLs in response to changes in neuronal activity. This lecture will explore to what extent myelin plasticity occurs in adult animals, whether myelin changes occur in non-motor learning tasks, especially in learning and memory, and questions whether myelin plasticity and myelin regeneration are two sides of the same coin.

CA3-CA1 synapses in the hippocampus are the initial locus of episodic memory. The action of acetylcholine alters cellular excitability, modifies neuronal networks, and triggers secondary signaling that directly affects long-term plasticity (LTP) (the cellular underpinning of memory). It is therefore considered a critical regulator of learning and memory in the brain. Its action via M4 metabotropic receptors in the presynaptic terminal of the CA3 neurons and M1 metabotropic receptors in the postsynaptic spines of CA1 neurons produce rich dynamics across multiple timescales. We developed a model to describe the activation of postsynaptic M1 receptors that leads to IP3 production from membrane PIP2 molecules. The binding of IP3 to IP3 receptors in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) ultimately causes calcium release. This calcium release from the ER activates potassium channels like the calcium-activated SK channels and alters different aspects of synaptic signaling. In an independent signaling cascade, M1 receptors also directly suppress SK channels and the voltage-activated KCNQ2/3 channels, enhancing post-synaptic excitability. In the CA3 presynaptic terminal, we model the reduction of the voltage sensitivity of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) and the resulting suppression of neurotransmitter release by the action of the M4 receptors. Our results show that the reduced initial release probability because of acetylcholine alters short-term plasticity (STP) dynamics. We characterize the dichotomy of suppressing neurotransmitter release from CA3 neurons and the enhanced excitability of the postsynaptic CA1 spine. Mechanisms underlying STP operate over a few seconds, while those responsible for LTP last for hours, and both forms of plasticity have been linked with very distinct functions in the brain. We show that the concurrent suppression of neurotransmitter release and increased sensitivity conserves neurotransmitter vesicles and enhances the reliability in plasticity. Our work establishes a relationship between STP and LTP coordinated by neuromodulation with acetylcholine.

The ability to recognize someone’s voice spans a broad spectrum with phonagnosia on the low end and super recognition at the high end. Yet there is no standardized test to measure the individual ability to learn and recognize newly-learnt voices with samples of speech-like phonetic variability. We have developed the Jena Voice Learning and Memory Test (JVLMT), a 20 min-test based on item response theory and applicable across different languages. The JVLMT consists of three phases in which participants are familiarized with eight speakers in two stages and then perform a three-alternative forced choice recognition task, using pseudo sentences devoid of semantic content. Acoustic (dis)similarity analyses were used to create items with different levels of difficulty. Test scores are based on 22 Rasch-conform items. Items were selected and validated in online studies based on 232 and 454 participants, respectively. Mean accuracy is 0.51 with an SD of .18. The JVLMT showed high and moderate correlations with convergent validation tests (Bangor Voice Matching Test; Glasgow Voice Memory Test) and a weak correlation with a discriminant validation test (Digit Span). Empirical (marginal) reliability is 0.66. Four participants with super recognition (at least 2 SDs above the mean) and 7 participants with phonagnosia (at least 2 SDs below the mean) were identified. The JVLMT is a promising screen too for voice recognition abilities in a scientific and neuropsychological context.

Though studies show that abuse, neglect or trauma during childhood can lead to lifelong lifelong struggles including in mental health, research also indicates that solutions and interventions at various stages of life can be developed to help. And while many people manage to remain resilient, a lack of opportunity early in life, including because of poverty and systemic racism, can constrain their ability to realize their full potential. In what ways are health and other outcomes affected? How can systems instead restore opportunity? "The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory's biennial spring symposium, 'Early Life Stress & Mental Health,' will examine these issues. The daylong event will feature talks by neuroscientists, policy experts, physicians, educators and activists as they discuss how our experiences and biology work together to affect how our minds develop and what can be accomplished in helping people overcome early disadvantages.

Broadly, the Mauro Costa-Mattioli laboratory (The MCM Lab) encompasses two complementary lines of research. The first one, more traditional but very important, aims at unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying memory formation (e.g., using state-of-the-art molecular and cell-specific genetic approaches). Learning and memory disorders can strike the brain during development (e.g., Autism Spectrum Disorders and Down Syndrome), as well as during adulthood (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease). We are interested in understanding the specific circuits and molecular pathways that are primarily targeted in these disorders and how they can be restored. To tackle these questions, we use a multidisciplinary, convergent and cross-species approach that combines mouse and fly genetics, molecular biology, electrophysiology, stem cell biology, optogenetics and behavioral techniques. The second line of research, more recent and relatively unexplored, is focused on understanding how gut microbes control CNS driven-behavior and brain function. Our recent discoveries, that microbes in the gut could modulate brain function and behavior in a very powerful way, have added a whole new dimension to the classic view of how complex behaviors are controlled. The unexpected findings have opened new avenues of study for us and are currently driving my lab to answer a host of new and very interesting questions: - What are the gut microbes (and metabolites) that regulate CNS-driven behaviors? Would it be possible to develop an unbiased screening method to identify specific microbes that regulate different behaviors? - If this is the case, can we identify how members of the gut microbiome (and their metabolites) mechanistically influence brain function? - What is the communication channel between the gut microbiota and the brain? Do different gut microbes use different ways to interact with the brain? - Could disruption of the gut microbial ecology cause neurodevelopmental dysfunction? If so, what is the impact of disruption in young and adult animals? - More importantly, could specific restoration of selected bacterial strains (new generation probiotics) represent a novel therapeutic approach for the targeted treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders? - Finally, can we develop microbiota-directed therapeutic foods to repair brain dysfunction in a variety of neurological disorders?

Work in my laboratory is based on the assumptions that we do not know yet how all physiological functions are regulated and that mouse genetics by allowing to identify novel inter-organ communications is the most efficient ways to identify novel regulation of physiological functions. We test these two contention through the study of bone which is the organ my lab has studied since its inception. Based on precise cell biological and clinical reasons that will be presented during the seminar we hypothesized that bone should be a regulator of energy metabolism and reproduction and identified a bone-derived hormone termed osteocalcin that is responsible of these regulatory events. The study of this hormone revealed that in addition to its predicted functions it also regulates brain size, hippocampus development, prevents anxiety and depression and favors spatial learning and memory by signaling through a specific receptor we characterized. As will be presented, we elucidated some of the molecular events accounting for the influence of osteocalcin on brain and showed that maternal osteocalcin is the pool of this hormone that affects brain development. Subsequently and looking at all the physiological functions regulated by osteocalcin, i.e., memory, the ability to exercise, glucose metabolism, the regulation of testosterone biosynthesis, we realized that are all need or regulated in the case of danger. In other words it suggested that osteocalcin is an hormone needed to sense and overcome acute danger. Consonant with this hypothesis we next showed this led us to demonstrate that bone via osteocalcin is needed to mount an acute stress response through molecular and cellular mechanisms that will be presented during the seminar. overall, an evolutionary appraisal of bone biology, this body of work and experiments ongoing in the lab concur to suggest 1] the appearance of bone during evolution has changed how physiological functions as diverse as memory, the acute stress response but also exercise and glucose metabolism are regulated and 2] identified bone and osteocalcin as its molecular vector, as an organ needed to sense and response to danger.

People from cultures around the world tend to borrow from the domain of space to represent abstract concepts. For example, in the domain on time, we use spatial metaphors (e.g., describing the future as being in front and the past behind), accompany our speech with spatial gestures (e.g., gesturing to the left to refer to a past event), and use external tools that project time onto a spatial reference frame (e.g., calendars). Importantly, these associations are also present in the way we think and reason about time, suggesting that space and time are also linked in the mind. In this talk, I will explore the developmental origins and functional implications of these types of cross-dimensional associations. To start, I will discuss the roles that language and culture play in shaping how children in the US and India represent time. Next, I will use word learning and memory as test cases for exploring why cross-dimensional associations may be cognitively advantageous. Finally, I will talk about future directions and the practical implications for this line of work, with a focus on how encouraging spatial representations of abstract concepts could improve learning outcomes.

Courtship behavior is an innate model for many types of brain computations including sensory detection, learning and memory, and internal state modulation. Despite the robustness of the behavior, we have little understanding of the underlying neural circuits and mechanisms. The Stowers’ lab is leveraging the ability of specialized olfactory cues, pheromones, to specifically activate and therefore identify and study courtship circuits in the mouse. We are interested in identifying general circuit principles (specific brain nodes and information flow) that are common to all individuals, in order to additionally study how experience, gender, age, and internal state modulate and personalize behavior. We are solving two parallel sensory to motor courtship circuits, that promote social vocal calling and scent marking, to study information processing of behavior as a complete unit instead of restricting focus to a single brain region. We expect comparing and contrasting the coding logic of two courtship motor behaviors will begin to shed light on general principles of how the brain senses context, weighs experience and responds to internal state to ultimately decide appropriate action.

Genome-wide association studies implicate microglia in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis, but how microglia contribute to cognitive decline in AD is unclear. Emerging research suggests microglia, the resident macrophages of the central nervous system, to be active participants in brain wiring. One mechanism by which microglia help eliminate synapses is through the classical complement pathway (C1q, CR3/C3). Data from multiple laboratories collectively suggest that there may be an aberrant reactivation of the complement-dependent pruning pathway in multiple models of neurologic diseases including AD. These data altogether suggest that microglia participate in synaptic pathology. However, how and which synapses are targeted are unknown. Furthermore, whether microglia directly impair synaptic function is unknown. Primary goals of my laboratory are to understand how higher cognitive functions such as learning and memory involve microglial biology in the healthy adult brain and dissect immune mechanisms behind the region-specific vulnerability of synapse loss and neuronal dysfunction during disease. Mechanistic insight into local signals that regulate neuroglia interactions will be key to developing potential therapeutic avenues to target in disease.

Synaptic scaling is a homeostatic normalization mechanism that preserves relative synaptic strengths by adjusting them with a common factor. This multiplicative change is believed to be critical, since synaptic strengths are involved in learning and memory retention. Further, this homeostatic process is thought to be crucial for neuronal stability, playing a stabilizing role in otherwise runaway Hebbian plasticity [1-3]. Synaptic scaling requires a mechanism to sense total neuron activity and globally adjust synapses to achieve some activity set-point [4]. This process is relatively slow, which places limits on its ability to stabilize network activity [5]. Here we show that this slow response is inevitable in realistic neuronal morphologies. Furthermore, we reveal that global scaling can in fact be a source of instability unless responsiveness or scaling accuracy are sacrificed." "A neuron with tens of thousands of synapses must regulate its own excitability to compensate for changes in input. The time requirement for global feedback can introduce critical phase lags in a neuron’s response to perturbation. The severity of phase lag increases with neuron size. Further, a more expansive morphology worsens cell responsiveness and scaling accuracy, especially in distal regions of the neuron. Local pools of reserve receptors improve efficiency, potentiation, and scaling, but this comes at a cost. Trafficking large quantities of receptors requires time, exacerbating the phase lag and instability. Local homeostatic feedback mitigates instability, but this too comes at the cost of reducing scaling accuracy." "Realization of the phase lag instability requires a unified model of synaptic scaling, regulation, and transport. We present such a model with global and local feedback in realistic neuron morphologies (Fig. 1). This combined model shows that neurons face a tradeoff between stability, accuracy, and efficiency. Global feedback is required for synaptic scaling but favors either system stability or efficiency. Large receptor pools improve scaling accuracy in large morphologies but worsen both stability and efficiency. Local feedback improves the stability-efficiency tradeoff at the cost of scaling accuracy. This project introduces unexplored constraints on neuron size, morphology, and synaptic scaling that are weakened by an interplay between global and local feedback.

The hippocampus-entorhinal system is critical for learning and memory. Recent cutting-edge single-cell technologies from RNAseq to electrophysiology are disclosing a so far unrecognized heterogeneity within the major cell types (1). Surprisingly, massive high-throughput recordings of these very same cells identify low dimensional microcircuit dynamics (2,3). Reconciling both views is critical to understand how the brain operates. " "The CA1 region is considered high in the hierarchy of the entorhinal-hippocampal system. Traditionally viewed as a single layered structure, recent evidence has disclosed an exquisite laminar organization across deep and superficial pyramidal sublayers at the transcriptional, morphological and functional levels (1,4,5). Such a low-dimensional segregation may be driven by a combination of intrinsic, biophysical and microcircuit factors but mechanisms are unknown." "Here, we exploit evolutionary algorithms to address the effect of single-cell heterogeneity on CA1 pyramidal cell activity (6). First, we developed a biophysically realistic model of CA1 pyramidal cells using the Hodgkin-Huxley multi-compartment formalism in the Neuron+Python platform and the morphological database Neuromorpho.org. We adopted genetic algorithms (GA) to identify passive, active and synaptic conductances resulting in realistic electrophysiological behavior. We then used the generated models to explore the functional effect of intrinsic, synaptic and morphological heterogeneity during oscillatory activities. By combining results from all simulations in a logistic regression model we evaluated the effect of up/down-regulation of different factors. We found that muyltidimensional excitatory and inhibitory inputs interact with morphological and intrinsic factors to determine a low dimensional subset of output features (e.g. phase-locking preference) that matches non-fitted experimental data.

Plasticity shapes the brain during development, and mechanisms of plasticity continue into adulthood to enable learning and memory. Nearly all brain functions are influenced by past events, reinforcing the view that the confluence of plasticity and computation in the same circuit elements is a core component of biological intelligence. My laboratory studies plasticity in the cerebral cortex during development, and plasticity during behaviour that is manifest as cortical dynamics. I will describe how cortical plasticity is implemented by learning rules that involve not only Hebbian changes and synaptic scaling but also dendritic renormalization. By using advanced techniques such as optical measurements of single-synapse function and structure in identified neurons in awake behaving mice, we have recently demonstrated locally coordinated plasticity in dendrites whereby specific synapses are strengthened and adjacent synapses with complementary features are weakened. Together, these changes cooperatively implement functional plasticity in neurons. Such plasticity relies on the dynamics of activity-dependent molecules within and between synapses. Alongside, it is increasingly clear that risk genes associated with neurodevelopmental disorders disproportionately target molecules of plasticity. Deficits in renormalization contribute fundamentally to dysfunctional neuronal circuits and computations, and may be a unifying mechanistic feature of these disorders.