This webinar brings together three leaders in theoretical and computational neuroscience—Larry Abbott, Haim Sompolinsky, and Terry Sejnowski—to discuss how neural circuits generate fundamental aspects of the mind. Abbott illustrates mechanisms in electric fish that differentiate self-generated electric signals from external sensory cues, showing how predictive plasticity and two-stage signal cancellation mediate a sense of self. Sompolinsky explores attractor networks, revealing how discrete and continuous attractors can stabilize activity patterns, enable working memory, and incorporate chaotic dynamics underlying spontaneous behaviors. He further highlights the concept of object manifolds in high-level sensory representations and raises open questions on integrating connectomics with theoretical frameworks. Sejnowski bridges these motifs with modern artificial intelligence, demonstrating how large-scale neural networks capture language structures through distributed representations that parallel biological coding. Together, their presentations emphasize the synergy between empirical data, computational modeling, and connectomics in explaining the neural basis of cognition—offering insights into perception, memory, language, and the emergence of mind-like processes.

This webinar features presentations from SueYeon Chung (New York University) and Srinivas Turaga (HHMI Janelia Research Campus) on theoretical and computational approaches to sensory cognition. Chung introduced a “neural manifold” framework to capture how high-dimensional neural activity is structured into meaningful manifolds reflecting object representations. She demonstrated that manifold geometry—shaped by radius, dimensionality, and correlations—directly governs a population’s capacity for classifying or separating stimuli under nuisance variations. Applying these ideas as a data analysis tool, she showed how measuring object-manifold geometry can explain transformations along the ventral visual stream and suggested that manifold principles also yield better self-supervised neural network models resembling mammalian visual cortex. Turaga described simulating the entire fruit fly visual pathway using its connectome, modeling 64 key cell types in the optic lobe. His team’s systematic approach—combining sparse connectivity from electron microscopy with simple dynamical parameters—recapitulated known motion-selective responses and produced novel testable predictions. Together, these studies underscore the power of combining connectomic detail, task objectives, and geometric theories to unravel neural computations bridging from stimuli to cognitive functions.

Understanding Human ability to learn novel concepts from just a few sensory experiences is a fundamental problem in cognitive neuroscience. I will describe a recent work with Ben Sorcher and Surya Ganguli (PNAS, October 2022) in which we propose a simple, biologically plausible, and mathematically tractable neural mechanism for few-shot learning of naturalistic concepts. We posit that the concepts that can be learned from few examples are defined by tightly circumscribed manifolds in the neural firing-rate space of higher-order sensory areas. Discrimination between novel concepts is performed by downstream neurons implementing ‘prototype’ decision rule, in which a test example is classified according to the nearest prototype constructed from the few training examples. We show that prototype few-shot learning achieves high few-shot learning accuracy on natural visual concepts using both macaque inferotemporal cortex representations and deep neural network (DNN) models of these representations. We develop a mathematical theory that links few-shot learning to the geometric properties of the neural concept manifolds and demonstrate its agreement with our numerical simulations across different DNNs as well as different layers. Intriguingly, we observe striking mismatches between the geometry of manifolds in intermediate stages of the primate visual pathway and in trained DNNs. Finally, we show that linguistic descriptors of visual concepts can be used to discriminate images belonging to novel concepts, without any prior visual experience of these concepts (a task known as ‘zero-shot’ learning), indicated a remarkable alignment of manifold representations of concepts in visual and language modalities. I will discuss ongoing effort to extend this work to other high level cognitive tasks.

Neural activity in many sensory systems is organized on low-dimensional manifolds by means of convex receptive fields. Neural codes in these areas are constrained by this organization, as not every neural code is compatible with convex receptive fields. The same codes are also constrained by the structure of the underlying neural network. In my talk I will attempt to provide answers to the following natural questions: (i) How do recurrent circuits generate codes that are compatible with the convexity of receptive fields? (ii) How can we utilize the constraints imposed by the convex receptive field to understand the underlying stimulus space. To answer question (i), we describe the combinatorics of the steady states and fixed points of recurrent networks that satisfy the Dale’s law. It turns out the combinatorics of the fixed points are completely determined by two distinct conditions: (a) the connectivity graph of the network and (b) a spectral condition on the synaptic matrix. We give a characterization of exactly which features of connectivity determine the combinatorics of the fixed points. We also find that a generic recurrent network that satisfies Dale's law outputs convex combinatorial codes. To address question (ii), I will describe methods based on ideas from topology and geometry that take advantage of the convex receptive field properties to infer the dimension of (non-linear) neural representations. I will illustrate the first method by inferring basic features of the neural representations in the mouse olfactory bulb.

A central goal in neuroscience is to understand how orchestrated computations in the brain arise from the properties of single neurons and networks of such neurons. Answering this question requires theoretical advances that shine light into the ‘black box’ of representations in neural circuits. In this talk, we will demonstrate theoretical approaches that help describe how cognitive and behavioral task implementations emerge from the structure in neural populations and from biologically plausible neural networks. First, we will introduce an analytic theory that connects geometric structures that arise from neural responses (i.e., neural manifolds) to the neural population’s efficiency in implementing a task. In particular, this theory describes a perceptron’s capacity for linearly classifying object categories based on the underlying neural manifolds’ structural properties. Next, we will describe how such methods can, in fact, open the ‘black box’ of distributed neuronal circuits in a range of experimental neural datasets. In particular, our method overcomes the limitations of traditional dimensionality reduction techniques, as it operates directly on the high-dimensional representations, rather than relying on low-dimensionality assumptions for visualization. Furthermore, this method allows for simultaneous multi-level analysis, by measuring geometric properties in neural population data, and estimating the amount of task information embedded in the same population. These geometric frameworks are general and can be used across different brain areas and task modalities, as demonstrated in the work of ours and others, ranging from the visual cortex to parietal cortex to hippocampus, and from calcium imaging to electrophysiology to fMRI datasets. Finally, we will discuss our recent efforts to fully extend this multi-level description of neural populations, by (1) investigating how single neuron properties shape the representation geometry in early sensory areas, and by (2) understanding how task-efficient neural manifolds emerge in biologically-constrained neural networks. By extending our mathematical toolkit for analyzing representations underlying complex neuronal networks, we hope to contribute to the long-term challenge of understanding the neuronal basis of tasks and behaviors.

Biological brains possess an exceptional ability to infer relevant behavioral responses to a wide range of stimuli from only a few examples. This capacity to generalize beyond the training set has been proven particularly challenging to realize in artificial systems. How neural processes enable this capacity to extrapolate to novel stimuli is a fundamental open question. A prominent but underexplored hypothesis suggests that generalization is facilitated by a low-dimensional organization of collective neural activity, yet evidence for the underlying neural mechanisms remains wanting. Combining network modeling, theory and neural data analysis, we tested this hypothesis in the framework of flexible timing tasks, which rely on the interplay between inputs and recurrent dynamics. We first trained recurrent neural networks on a set of timing tasks while minimizing the dimensionality of neural activity by imposing low-rank constraints on the connectivity, and compared the performance and generalization capabilities with networks trained without any constraint. We then examined the trained networks, characterized the dynamical mechanisms underlying the computations, and verified their predictions in neural recordings. Our key finding is that low-dimensional dynamics strongly increases the ability to extrapolate to inputs outside of the range used in training. Critically, this capacity to generalize relies on controlling the low-dimensional dynamics by a parametric contextual input. We found that this parametric control of extrapolation was based on a mechanism where tonic inputs modulate the dynamics along non-linear manifolds in activity space while preserving their geometry. Comparisons with neural recordings in the dorsomedial frontal cortex of macaque monkeys performing flexible timing tasks confirmed the geometric and dynamical signatures of this mechanism. Altogether, our results tie together a number of previous experimental findings and suggest that the low-dimensional organization of neural dynamics plays a central role in generalizable behaviors.

Active matter describes a class of systems that are maintained far from equilibrium by driving forces acting on the constituent particles. Here I will focus on confined active nematics, which exhibit especially rich flow behavior, ranging from structured patterns in space and time to disordered turbulent flows. To understand this behavior, I will take a deterministic dynamical systems approach, beginning with the hydrodynamic equations for the active nematic. This approach reveals that the infinite-dimensional phase space of all possible flow configurations is populated by Exact Coherent Structures (ECS), which are exact solutions of the hydrodynamic equations with distinct and regular spatiotemporal structure; examples include unstable equilibria, periodic orbits, and traveling waves. The ECS are connected by dynamical pathways called invariant manifolds. The main hypothesis in this approach is that turbulence corresponds to a trajectory meandering in the phase space, transitioning between ECS by traveling on the invariant manifolds. Similar approaches have been successful in characterizing high Reynolds number turbulence of passive fluids. Here, I will present the first systematic study of active nematic ECS and their invariant manifolds and discuss their role in characterizing the phenomenon of active turbulence.

A central goal in neuroscience is to understand how orchestrated computations in the brain arise from the properties of single neurons and networks of such neurons. Answering this question requires theoretical advances that shine light into the ‘black box’ of neuronal networks. In this talk, I will demonstrate theoretical approaches that help describe how cognitive and behavioral task implementations emerge from structure in neural populations and from biologically plausible learning rules. First, I will introduce an analytic theory that connects geometric structures that arise from neural responses (i.e., neural manifolds) to the neural population’s efficiency in implementing a task. In particular, this theory describes how easy or hard it is to discriminate between object categories based on the underlying neural manifolds’ structural properties. Next, I will describe how such methods can, in fact, open the ‘black box’ of neuronal networks, by showing how we can understand a) the role of network motifs in task implementation in neural networks and b) the role of neural noise in adversarial robustness in vision and audition. Finally, I will discuss my recent efforts to develop biologically plausible learning rules for neuronal networks, inspired by recent experimental findings in synaptic plasticity. By extending our mathematical toolkit for analyzing representations and learning rules underlying complex neuronal networks, I hope to contribute toward the long-term challenge of understanding the neuronal basis of behaviors.

During periods of persistent and inescapable stress, animals can switch from active to passive coping strategies to manage effort-expenditure. Such normally adaptive behavioural state transitions can become maladaptive in disorders such as depression. We developed a new class of multi-region recurrent neural network (RNN) models to infer brain-wide interactions driving such maladaptive behaviour. The models were trained to match experimental data across two levels simultaneously: brain-wide neural dynamics from 10-40,000 neurons and the realtime behaviour of the fish. Analysis of the trained RNN models revealed a specific change in inter-area connectivity between the habenula (Hb) and raphe nucleus during the transition into passivity. We then characterized the multi-region neural dynamics underlying this transition. Using the interaction weights derived from the RNN models, we calculated the input currents from different brain regions to each Hb neuron. We then computed neural manifolds spanning these input currents across all Hb neurons to define subspaces within the Hb activity that captured communication with each other brain region independently. At the onset of stress, there was an immediate response within the Hb/raphe subspace alone. However, RNN models identified no early or fast-timescale change in the strengths of interactions between these regions. As the animal lapsed into passivity, the responses within the Hb/raphe subspace decreased, accompanied by a concomitant change in the interactions between the raphe and Hb inferred from the RNN weights. This innovative combination of network modeling and neural dynamics analysis points to dual mechanisms with distinct timescales driving the behavioural state transition: early response to stress is mediated by reshaping the neural dynamics within a preserved network architecture, while long-term state changes correspond to altered connectivity between neural ensembles in distinct brain regions.