Exerting controlled forces in a non-contact way is important in biomedical investigations which require holding, moving, or mechanically probing biomedical samples. Optical and acoustic manipulation of microscopic samples both play a prominent role among suitable technologies. The differences in the physical laws and in the typical length scales governing acoustic and optical forces make them complementary: Acoustic forces can levitate large and heavy particles, which optical tweezers could not handle without adverse high-power effects, while optical forces cover subcellular scales. The talk will contrast the two modalities, and identify situations where one or the other is favorable, or when a combination of both is the best choice.

Motility is a crucial virulence factor for many species of bacteria, but it is not fully understood how bacterial motility is practically involved in pathogenicity. This time I will give a talk on the association of motility with pathogenicity in the zoonotic spirochete bacterium Leptospira. Recently, we measured swimming force of individual leptospires using optical tweezers and found that they can generate ~30 times of the swimming force of E. coli. We also observed that leptospires increase the reversal frequency of swimming at the gel-liquid interface, resembling host dermis exposed to contaminated water (Abe et al., 2020, Sci Rep). These could be involved in percutaneous infection of the spirochete. We have shown that Leptospira not only swims in liquid but also moves over solid surfaces (Tahara et al., 2018, Sci Adv). We quantified the surface motility called “crawling” on cultured kidney tissues from various mammals, showing that pathogenic leptospires crawl over the tissue surfaces more persistently that non-pathogenic ones (Xu et al., 2020, Front Microbiol). I will discuss the spirochete motility related to pathogenicity from the biophysical viewpoint.