Behavior and cognition depend on the integrated action of neural structures and populations distributed throughout the brain. We recently developed a set of molecular imaging tools that enable multiregional processing and plasticity in neural networks to be studied at a brain-wide scale in rodents and nonhuman primates. Here we will describe how a novel genetically encoded activity reporter enables information flow in virally labeled neural circuitry to be monitored by fMRI. Using the reporter to perform functional imaging of synaptically defined neural populations in the rat somatosensory system, we show how activity is transformed within brain regions to yield characteristics specific to distinct output projections. We also show how this approach enables regional activity to be modeled in terms of inputs, in a paradigm that we are extending to address circuit-level origins of functional specialization in marmoset brains. In the second part of the talk, we will discuss how another genetic tool for MRI enables systematic studies of the relationship between anatomical and functional connectivity in the mouse brain. We show that variations in physical and functional connectivity can be dissociated both across individual subjects and over experience. We also use the tool to examine brain-wide relationships between plasticity and activity during an opioid treatment. This work demonstrates the possibility of studying diverse brain-wide processing phenomena using molecular neuroimaging.

Sound waves can be used to modify brain activity safely and transiently with unprecedented precision even deep in the brain - unlike traditional brain stimulation methods. In a series of studies in humans and non-human primates, I will show that Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation (TUS) can have medium- to long-lasting effects. Multiple read-outs allow us to conclude that TUS can perturb neuronal tissues up to 2h after intervention, including changes in local and distributed brain network configurations, behavioural changes, task-related neuronal changes and chemical changes in the sonicated focal volume. Combined with multiple neuroimaging techniques (resting state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging [rsfMRI], Spectroscopy [MRS] and task-related fMRI changes), this talk will focus on recent human TUS studies.

When listening to music, humans readily perceive and move along with a periodic beat. Critically, perception of a periodic beat is commonly elicited by rhythmic stimuli with physical features arranged in a way that is not strictly periodic. Hence, beat perception must capitalize on mechanisms that transform stimulus features into a temporally recurrent format with emphasized beat periodicity. Here, I will present a line of work that aims to clarify the nature and neural basis of this transformation. In these studies, electrophysiological activity was recorded as participants listened to rhythms known to induce perception of a consistent beat across healthy Western adults. The results show that the human brain selectively emphasizes beat representation when it is not acoustically prominent in the stimulus, and this transformation (i) can be captured non-invasively using surface EEG in adult participants, (ii) is already in place in 5- to 6-month-old infants, and (iii) cannot be fully explained by subcortical auditory nonlinearities. Moreover, as revealed by human intracerebral recordings, a prominent beat representation emerges already in the primary auditory cortex. Finally, electrophysiological recordings from the auditory cortex of a rhesus monkey show a significant enhancement of beat periodicities in this area, similar to humans. Taken together, these findings indicate an early, general auditory cortical stage of processing by which rhythmic inputs are rendered more temporally recurrent than they are in reality. Already present in non-human primates and human infants, this "periodized" default format could then be shaped by higher-level associative sensory-motor areas and guide movement in individuals with strongly coupled auditory and motor systems. Together, this highlights the multiplicity of neural processes supporting coordinated musical behaviors widely observed across human cultures.The experiments herein include: a motor timing task comparing the effects of movement vs non-movement with and without feedback (Exp. 1A & 1B), a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study on the role of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in transforming temporal information (Exp. 2), and a perceptual timing task investigating the effect of noisy movement on time perception with both visual and auditory modalities (Exp. 3A & 3B). Together, the results of these studies support the Bayesian cue combination framework, in that: movement improves the precision of time perception not only in perceptual timing tasks but also motor timing tasks (Exp. 1A & 1B), stimulating the SMA appears to disrupt the transformation of temporal information (Exp. 2), and when movement becomes unreliable or noisy there is no longer an improvement in precision of time perception (Exp. 3A & 3B). Although there is support for the proposed framework, more studies (i.e., fMRI, TMS, EEG, etc.) need to be conducted in order to better understand where and how this may be instantiated in the brain; however, this work provides a starting point to better understanding the intrinsic connection between time and movement

Sex hormones are powerful neuromodulators of learning and memory. In rodents and nonhuman primates estrogen and progesterone influence the central nervous system across a range of spatiotemporal scales. Yet, their influence on the structural and functional architecture of the human brain is largely unknown. Here, I highlight findings from a series of dense-sampling neuroimaging studies from my laboratory designed to probe the dynamic interplay between the nervous and endocrine systems. Individuals underwent brain imaging and venipuncture every 12-24 hours for 30 consecutive days. These procedures were carried out under freely cycling conditions and again under a pharmacological regimen that chronically suppresses sex hormone production. First, resting state fMRI evidence suggests that transient increases in estrogen drive robust increases in functional connectivity across the brain. Time-lagged methods from dynamical systems analysis further reveals that these transient changes in estrogen enhance within-network integration (i.e. global efficiency) in several large-scale brain networks, particularly Default Mode and Dorsal Attention Networks. Next, using high-resolution hippocampal subfield imaging, we found that intrinsic hormone fluctuations and exogenous hormone manipulations can rapidly and dynamically shape medial temporal lobe morphology. Together, these findings suggest that neuroendocrine factors influence the brain over short and protracted timescales.

Understanding what makes human unique is a fundamental research drive for comparative psychologists. Cognitive abilities such as theory of mind, cooperation or mental time travel have been considered uniquely human. Despite empirical evidence showing that animals other than humans are able (to some extent) of these cognitive achievements, findings are still heavily contested. In this context, being able to abstract relations of similarity has also been considered one of the hallmarks of human cognition. While previous research has shown that other animals (e.g., primates) can attend to relational similarity, less is known about what invertebrates can do. In this talk, I will present a series of spatial matching tasks that previously were used with children and great apes and that I adapted for use with wild-caught bumblebees. The findings from these studies suggest striking similarities between vertebrates and invertebrates in their abilities to attend to relational similarity.

What do nonhuman primates know about each other and their social environment, how do they allocate their attention, and what are the functional consequences of social decisions in natural settings? Addressing these questions is crucial to hone in on the co-evolution of cognition, social behaviour and communication, and ultimately the evolution of intelligence in the primate order. I will present results from field experimental and observational studies on free-ranging baboons, which tap into the cognitive abilities of these animals. Baboons are particularly valuable in this context as different species reveal substantial variation in social organization and degree of despotism. Field experiments revealed considerable variation in the allocation of social attention: while the competitive chacma baboons were highly sensitive to deviations from the social order, the highly tolerant Guinea baboons revealed a confirmation bias. This bias may be a result of the high gregariousness of the species, which puts a premium on ignoring social noise. Variation in despotism clearly impacted the use of signals to regulate social interactions. For instance, male-male interactions in chacma baboons mostly comprised dominance displays, while Guinea baboon males evolved elaborate greeting rituals that serve to confirm group membership and test social bonds. Strikingly, the structure of signal repertoires does not differ substantially between different baboon species. In conclusion, the motivational disposition to engage in affiliation or aggressiveness appears to be more malleable during evolution than structural elements of the behavioral repertoire; this insight is crucial for understanding the dynamics of social evolution.

To maintain a stable and clear image of the world, our eyes reflexively follow the direction in which a visual scene is moving. Such gaze stabilization mechanisms reduce image blur as we move in the environment. In non-primate mammals, this behavior is initiated by ON-type direction-selective ganglion cells (ON-DSGCs), which detect the direction of image motion and transmit signals to brainstem nuclei that drive compensatory eye movements. However, ON-DSGCs have not yet been functionally identified in primates, raising the possibility that the visual inputs that drive this behavior instead arise in the cortex. In this talk, I will present molecular, morphological and functional evidence for identification of an ON-DSGC in macaque retina. The presence of ON-DSGCs highlights the need to examine the contribution of subcortical retinal mechanisms to normal and aberrant gaze stabilization in the developing and mature visual system. More generally, our findings demonstrate the power of a multimodal approach to study sparsely represented primate RGC types.

An influential theory in systems neuroscience suggests that brain function can be understood through low-dimensional dynamics [Vyas et al 2020]. However, a challenge in this framework is that a single computational task may involve a range of dynamic processes. To understand which processes are at play in the brain, it is important to use data on neural activity to constrain models. In this study, we present a method for extracting low-dimensional dynamics from data using low-rank recurrent neural networks (lrRNNs), a highly expressive and understandable type of model [Mastrogiuseppe & Ostojic 2018, Dubreuil, Valente et al. 2022]. We first test our approach using synthetic data created from full-rank RNNs that have been trained on various brain tasks. We find that lrRNNs fitted to neural activity allow us to identify the collective computational processes and make new predictions for inactivations in the original RNNs. We then apply our method to data recorded from the prefrontal cortex of primates during a context-dependent decision-making task. Our approach enables us to assign computational roles to the different latent variables and provides a mechanistic model of the recorded dynamics, which can be used to perform in silico experiments like inactivations and provide testable predictions.

Studies of the mouse visual system have revealed a variety of visual brain areas in a roughly hierarchical arrangement, together with a multitude of behavioral capacities, ranging from stimulus-reward associations, to goal-directed navigation, and object-centric discriminations. However, an overall understanding of the mouse’s visual cortex organization, and how this organization supports visual behaviors, remains unknown. Here, we take a computational approach to help address these questions, providing a high-fidelity quantitative model of mouse visual cortex. By analyzing factors contributing to model fidelity, we identified key principles underlying the organization of mouse visual cortex. Structurally, we find that comparatively low-resolution and shallow structure were both important for model correctness. Functionally, we find that models trained with task-agnostic, unsupervised objective functions, based on the concept of contrastive embeddings were substantially better than models trained with supervised objectives. Finally, the unsupervised objective builds a general-purpose visual representation that enables the system to achieve better transfer on out-of-distribution visual, scene understanding and reward-based navigation tasks. Our results suggest that mouse visual cortex is a low-resolution, shallow network that makes best use of the mouse’s limited resources to create a light-weight, general-purpose visual system – in contrast to the deep, high-resolution, and more task-specific visual system of primates.

Evolution has endowed primates, including humans, with a powerful visual system, seemingly providing us with a detailed perception of our surroundings. But in reality the underlying process is one of active filtering, enhancement and reshaping. For visual motion perception, the dorsal pathway in primate visual cortex and in particular area MT/V5 is considered to be of critical importance. Combining physiological and psychophysical approaches we have used the processing and perception of visual motion and area MT/V5 as a model for the interaction of sensory (bottom-up) signals with cognitive (top-down) modulatory influences that characterizes visual perception. Our findings document how this interaction enables visual cortex to actively generate a neural representation of the environment that combines the high-performance sensory periphery with selective modulatory influences for producing an “integrated saliency map’ of the environment.

During primate evolution, prefrontal cortex (PFC) expanded substantially relative to other cortical areas. The expansion of PFC circuits likely supported the increased cognitive abilities of humans and anthropoids to sample information about their environment, evaluate that information, plan, and decide between different courses of action. What quantities do these circuits compute as information is being sampled towards and a decision is being made? And how can they be related to anatomical specialisations within and across PFC? To address this, we recorded PFC activity during value-based decision making using single unit recording in non-human primates and magnetoencephalography in humans. At a macrocircuit level, we found that value correlates differ substantially across PFC subregions. They are heavily shaped by each subregion’s anatomical connections and by the decision-maker’s current locus of attention. At a microcircuit level, we found that the temporal evolution of value correlates can be predicted using cortical recurrent network models that temporally integrate incoming decision evidence. These models reflect the fact that PFC circuits are highly recurrent in nature and have synaptic properties that support persistent activity across temporally extended cognitive tasks. Our findings build upon recent work describing economic decision making as a process of attention-weighted evidence integration across time.

The theory of predictive processing posits that the brain computes expectations to process information predictively. Empirical evidence in support of this theory, however, is scarce and largely limited to sensory areas. Here, we report a precise and adaptive mechanism in the frontal cortex of non-human primates consistent with predictive processing of temporal events. We found that the speed of neural dynamics is precisely adjusted according to the average time of an expected stimulus. This speed adjustment, in turn, enables neurons to encode stimuli in terms of deviations from expectation. This lawful relationship was evident across multiple experiments and held true during learning: when temporal statistics underwent covert changes, neural responses underwent predictable changes that reflected the new mean. Together, these results highlight a precise mathematical relationship between temporal statistics in the environment and neural activity in the frontal cortex that may serve as a mechanism for predictive temporal processing.

The ability to reach, grasp, and manipulate objects is a remarkable expression of motor skill, and the loss of this ability in injury, stroke, or disease can be devastating. These behaviors are controlled by the coordinated activity of tens of millions of neurons distributed across many CNS regions, including the primary motor cortex. While many studies have characterized the activity of single cortical neurons during reaching, the principles governing the dynamics of large, distributed neural populations remain largely unknown. Recent work in primates has suggested that during the execution of reaching, motor cortex may autonomously generate the neural pattern controlling the movement, much like the spinal central pattern generator for locomotion. In this seminar, I will describe recent work that tests this hypothesis using large-scale neural recording, high-resolution behavioral measurements, dynamical systems approaches to data analysis, and optogenetic perturbations in mice. We find, by contrast, that motor cortex requires strong, continuous, and time-varying thalamic input to generate the neural pattern driving reaching. In a second line of work, we demonstrate that the cortico-cerebellar loop is not critical for driving the arm towards the target, but instead fine-tunes movement parameters to enable precise and accurate behavior. Finally, I will describe my future plans to apply these experimental and analytical approaches to the adaptive control of locomotion in complex environments.

Human cognitive abilities seem qualitatively different from the cognitive abilities of other primates, a difference Penn, Holyoak, and Povinelli (2008) attribute to role-based relational reasoning—inferences and generalizations based on the relational roles to which objects (and other relations) are bound, rather than just the features of the objects themselves. Role-based relational reasoning depends on the ability to dynamically bind arguments to relational roles. But dynamic binding cannot be sufficient for relational thinking: Some non-human animals solve the dynamic binding problem, at least in some domains; and many non-human species generalize affordances to completely novel objects and scenes, a kind of universal generalization that likely depends on dynamic binding. If they can solve the dynamic binding problem, then why can they not reason about relations? What are they missing? I will present simulations with the LISA model of analogical reasoning (Hummel & Holyoak, 1997, 2003) suggesting that the missing pieces are multi-role integration (the capacity to combine multiple role bindings into complete relations) and structure mapping (the capacity to map different systems of role bindings onto one another). When LISA is deprived of either of these capacities, it can still generalize affordances universally, but it cannot reason symbolically; granted both abilities, LISA enjoys the full power of relational (symbolic) thought. I speculate that one reason it may have taken relational reasoning so long to evolve is that it required evolution to solve both problems simultaneously, since neither multi-role integration nor structure mapping appears to confer any adaptive advantage over simple role binding on its own.

I am interested in developing a neurally mechanistic understanding of how primate brains represent the world through its visual system and how such representations enable a remarkable set of intelligent behaviors. In this talk, I will primarily highlight aspects of my current research that focuses on dissecting the brain circuits that support core object recognition behavior (primates’ ability to categorize objects within hundreds of milliseconds) in non-human primates. On the one hand, my work empirically examines how well computational models of the primate ventral visual pathways embed knowledge of the visual brain function (e.g., Bashivan*, Kar*, DiCarlo, Science, 2019). On the other hand, my work has led to various functional and architectural insights that help improve such brain models. For instance, we have exposed the necessity of recurrent computations in primate core object recognition (Kar et al., Nature Neuroscience, 2019), one that is strikingly missing from most feedforward artificial neural network models. Specifically, we have observed that the primate ventral stream requires fast recurrent processing via ventrolateral PFC for robust core object recognition (Kar and DiCarlo, Neuron, 2021). In addition, I have been currently developing various chemogenetic strategies to causally target specific bidirectional neural circuits in the macaque brain during multiple object recognition tasks to further probe their relevance during this behavior. I plan to transform these data and insights into tangible progress in neuroscience via my collaboration with various computational groups and building improved brain models of object recognition. I hope to end the talk with a brief glimpse of some of my planned future work!

During primate evolution, prefrontal cortex (PFC) expanded substantially relative to other cortical areas. The expansion of PFC circuits likely supported the increased cognitive abilities of humans and anthropoids to plan, evaluate, and decide between different courses of action. But what do these circuits compute as a decision is being made, and how can they be related to anatomical specialisations within and across PFC? To address this, we recorded PFC activity during value-based decision making using single unit recording in non-human primates and magnetoencephalography in humans. At a macrocircuit level, we found that value correlates differ substantially across PFC subregions. They are heavily shaped by each subregion’s anatomical connections and by the decision-maker’s current locus of attention. At a microcircuit level, we found that the temporal evolution of value correlates can be predicted using cortical recurrent network models that temporally integrate incoming decision evidence. These models reflect the fact that PFC circuits are highly recurrent in nature and have synaptic properties that support persistent activity across temporally extended cognitive tasks. Our findings build upon recent work describing economic decision making as a process of attention-weighted evidence integration across time.

Although animals can estimate numerical quantities, true counting and arithmetic abilities are unique to humans and are inextricably linked to symbolic competence. However, our unprecedented numerical skills are deeply rooted in our neuronal heritage as primates and vertebrates. I argue that numerical competence in humans is the result of three neural constraints. First, I propose that the neuronal mechanisms of quantity estimation are part of our evolutionary heritage and can be witnessed across primate and vertebrate phylogeny. Second, I suggest that a basic understanding of number, what numerical quantity means, is innately wired into the brain and gives rise to an intuitive number sense, or number instinct. Third and finally, I argue that symbolic counting and arithmetic in humans is rooted in an evolutionarily and ontogenetically primeval neural system for non-symbolic number representations. These three neural constraints jointly determine the basic processing of number concepts in the human mind.

Among mammals, excellent color vision has evolved only in certain non-human primates. And yet, color is often assumed to be just a low-level stimulus feature with a modest role in encoding and recognizing objects. The rationale for this dogma is compelling: object recognition is excellent in grayscale images (consider black-and-white movies, where faces, places, objects, and story are readily apparent). In my talk I will discuss experiments in which we used color as a tool to uncover an organizational plan in inferior temporal cortex (parallel, multistage processing for places, faces, colors, and objects) and a visual-stimulus functional representation in prefrontal cortex (PFC). The discovery of an extensive network of color-biased domains within IT and PFC, regions implicated in high-level object vision and executive functions, compels a re-evaluation of the role of color in behavior. I will discuss behavioral studies prompted by the neurobiology that uncover a universal principle for color categorization across languages, the first systematic study of the color statistics of objects and a chromatic mechanism by which the brain may compute animacy, and a surprising paradoxical impact of memory on face color. Taken together, my talk will put forward the argument that color is not primarily for object recognition, but rather for the assessment of the likely behavioral relevance, or meaning, of the stuff we see.

Leah Krubitzer is a Distinguished Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of California, Davis. Her graduate work focused on the evolution of visual cortex in primates, and she extended her research in Australia to include monotremes and marsupials. She has worked on the brains of over 45 different mammals. Her current research focuses on the impact of early experience and how culture impacts brain development. She also examines the evolution of sensory motor networks involved in manual dexterity, reaching and grasping in mammals. She received a MacArthur award for her work on evolution.

Dr. Rajan and her lab design neural network models based on experimental data, and reverse-engineer them to figure out how brain circuits function in health and disease. They recently developed a powerful framework for tracing neural paths across multiple brain regions— called Current-Based Decomposition (CURBD). This new approach enables the computation of excitatory and inhibitory input currents that drive a given neuron, aiding in the discovery of how entire populations of neurons behave across multiple interacting brain regions. Dr. Rajan’s team has applied this method to studying the neural underpinnings of behavior. As an example, when CURBD was applied to data gathered from an animal model often used to study depression- and anxiety-like behaviors (i.e., learned helplessness) the underlying biology driving adaptive and maladaptive behaviors in the face of stress was revealed. With this framework Dr. Rajan's team probes for mechanisms at work across brain regions that support both healthy and disease states-- as well as identify key divergences from multiple different nervous systems, including zebrafish, mice, non-human primates, and humans.

I will discuss our recent evidence showing that information about abstract rules can be decoded from neuronal activity in primate visual cortex even in the absence of sensory stimulation. Furthermore, that rule information is greatest among neurons with the least visual activity and the weakest coupling to local neuronal networks. In addition, I will talk about recent developments in large-scale neurophysiological techniques in nonhuman primates.

If only those behaviours evolve that increase the actor’s own survival and reproductive success, then it might come as a surprise that cooperative behaviours, i.e. providing benefits to others, are a widespread phenomenon. Many animals cooperate even with unrelated individuals in various contexts, like providing care or food. One possibility to explain these behaviours is reciprocity. Reciprocal cooperation, i.e. helping those that were helpful before, is a ubiquitous and important trait of human sociality. Still, the evolutionary origin of it is largely unclear, mainly because it is believed that other animals do not exchange help reciprocally. Consequently, reciprocity is suggested to have evolved in the human lineage only. In contrast to this, I propose that reciprocity is not necessarily cognitively demanding and likely to be widespread. In my talk, I will first shed light on the mechanisms of reciprocal cooperation in Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus). In a series of studies, my colleagues and I have demonstrated that Norway rats reciprocally exchange goods and services between and within different commodities and independent of kinship. Furthermore, to understand the evolutionary origins of human reciprocity, and whether it is shared with other animals, I will then discuss evidence for reciprocity in non-human primates, which are our closest living relatives. A thorough analysis of the findings showed that reciprocity is present and, for example, not confined to unrelated individuals, but that the choice of commodities can impact the likelihood of reciprocation. Based on my findings, I conclude that reciprocal cooperation in non-human animals is present but largely neglected and not restricted to humans. In order to deepen our understanding of the evolutionary origins of reciprocity in more general, future studies should investigate when and how reciprocity in non-human animals emerged and how it is maintained.

Our work concerns the general problem of adaptive behaviour in response to predatory threats, and of the neural mechanisms underlying a choice between strategies. When faced with a threat, an animal must decide whether to freeze, reducing its chances of being noticed, or to flee to the safety of a refuge. Animals from fish to primates choose between these two alternatives when confronted by an attacking predator, a choice that largely depends on the context in which the threat occurs. Recent work has made strides identifying the pre-motor circuits, and their inputs, which control freezing behaviour in rodents, but how contextual information is integrated to guide this choice is still far from understood. The social environment is a potent contextual modulator of defensive behaviours of animals in a group. Indeed, anti-predation strategies are believed to be a major driving force for the evolution of sociality. We recently found that fruit flies in response to visual looming stimuli, simulating a large object on collision course, make rapid freeze/flee choices accompanied by lasting changes in the fly’s internal state, reflected in altered cardiac activity. In this talk, I will discuss our work on how flies process contextual cues, focusing on the social environment, to guide their behavioural response to a threat. We have identified a social safety cue, resumption of activity, and visual projection neurons involved in processing this cue. Given the knowledge regarding sensory detection of looming threats and descending neuron involved in the expression of freezing, we are now in a unique position to understand how information about a threat is integrated with cues from the social environment to guide the choice of whether to freeze.

Humans are biologically adapted for cultural life in ways that other primates are not. Humans have unique motivations and cognitive skills for sharing emotions, experience, and collaborative actions (shared intentionality). These motivations and skills first emerge in human ontogeny at around one year of age, as infants begin to participate with other persons in various kinds of collaborative and joint attentional activities, including linguistic communication. Our nearest primate relatives understand important aspects of intentional action - especially in competitive situations - but they do not seem to have the motivations and cognitive skills necessary to engage in activities involving collaboration, shared intentionality, and, in general, things cultural.

Humans and other primates exhibit rich and versatile behaviour, switching nimbly between tasks as the environmental context requires. I will discuss the neural coding patterns that make this possible in humans and deep networks. First, using deep network simulations, I will characterise two distinct solutions to task acquisition (“lazy” and “rich” learning) which trade off learning speed for robustness, and depend on the initial weights scale and network sparsity. I will chart the predictions of these two schemes for a context-dependent decision-making task, showing that the rich solution is to project task representations onto orthogonal planes on a low-dimensional embedding space. Using behavioural testing and functional neuroimaging in humans, we observe BOLD signals in human prefrontal cortex whose dimensionality and neural geometry are consistent with the rich learning regime. Next, I will discuss the problem of continual learning, showing that behaviourally, humans (unlike vanilla neural networks) learn more effectively when conditions are blocked than interleaved. I will show how this counterintuitive pattern of behaviour can be recreated in neural networks by assuming that information is normalised and temporally clustered (via Hebbian learning) alongside supervised training. Together, this work offers a picture of how humans learn to partition knowledge in the service of structured behaviour, and offers a roadmap for building neural networks that adopt similar principles in the service of multitask learning. This is work with Andrew Saxe, Timo Flesch, David Nagy, and others.

What psychological mechanisms do primates use to engage in self-control, and what is the ultimate function of these skills? I will argue that a suite of decision-making capacities, including choices about the timing of benefits, evolved in the context of foraging behaviors and vary with ecological complexity across species. Then, I will examine how these foraging capacities can be generalized to solve novel problems posing temporal costs that are important for humans, such as cooking food, and can therefore underpin evolutionary transitions in behavior. Finally, I will present work testing the hypothesis that a limited future time horizon constrains the expression of other complex abilities in nonhumans, explaining the emergence of human-unique forms of social cognition and behavior.

Behavioral states such as arousal and attention can have profound effects on sensory processing, determining how – sometimes whether – a stimulus is processed. This state-dependence is believed to arise, at least in part, as a result of inputs to cortex from subcortical structures that release neuromodulators such as acetylcholine, noradrenaline, and serotonin, often non-synaptically. The mechanisms that underlie the interaction between these “wireless” non-synaptic signals and the “wired” cortical circuit are not well understood. Furthermore, neuromodulatory signaling is traditionally considered broad in its impact across cortex (within a species) and consistent in its form and function across species (at least in mammals). The work I will present approaches the challenge of understanding neuromodulatory action in the cortex from a number of angles: anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, and chemistry. The overarching goal of our effort is to elucidate the mechanisms behind local neuromodulation in the cortex of non-human primates, and to reveal differences in structure and function across cortical model systems.

The evolution of speech is considered to be one of the hardest problems in science. Studies of the communicative abilities of our closest living relatives, the nonhuman primates, aim to contribute to a better understanding of the emergence of this uniquely human capability. Following a brief introduction over the key building blocks that make up the human speech faculty, I will focus on the question of meaning in nonhuman primate vocalizations. While nonhuman primate calls may be highly context specific, thus giving rise to the notion of ‘referentiality’, comparisons across closely related species suggest that this specificity is evolved rather than learned. Yet, as in humans, the structure of calls varies with arousal and affective state, and there is some evidence for effects of sensory-motor integration in vocal production. Thus, the vocal production of nonhuman primates bears little resemblance to the symbolic and combinatorial features of human speech, while basic production mechanisms are shared. Listeners, in contrast, are able learning the meaning of new sounds. A recent study using artificial predator shows that this learning may be extremely rapid. Furthermore, listeners are able to integrate information from multiple sources to make adaptive decisions, which renders the vocal communication system as a whole relatively flexible and powerful. In conclusion, constraints at the side of vocal production, including limits in social cognition and motivation to share experiences, rather than constraints at the side of the recipient explain the differences in communicative abilities between humans and other animals.

Organisms sense light for purposes that range from recognizing objects to synchronizing activity with environmental cycles. What mechanisms serve these diverse tasks? This seminar will examine the specializations of two cell types. First are the foveal cone photoreceptors. These neurons are used by primates to see far greater detail than other mammals, which lack them. How do the biophysical properties of foveal cones support high-acuity vision? Second are the melanopsin retinal ganglion cells, which are conserved among mammals and essential for processes that include regulation of the circadian clock, sleep, and hormone levels. How do these neurons encode light, and is encoding customized for animals of different niches? In pursuing these questions, a broad goal is to learn how various levels of biological organization are shaped to behavioural needs.

Learning the consequences our choices have as we interact with our world is critical for flexible behavior. Relational knowledge of one’s environment gives structure to otherwise-individual one-to-one stimulus-outcome mappings, providing a substrate to globally update behavioral contingencies in the face of changes in the landscape of reward. In the brain, this relational knowledge is thought to be encoded in the hippocampus (HPC) in the form of a cognitive map, while prefrontal regions, such as orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), are thought to instantiate subjective estimates of location on the map, though direct neurophysiological evidence is lacking. In this talk, I will present recent work demonstrating the causal relationship between HPC and OFC as nonhuman primates perform a reward learning task requiring them to learn and maintain knowledge of changing stimulus-outcome associations. I will then provide direct evidence that single primate hippocampal neurons represent an abstract map of the value space defined by the task. Finally, I use behavioral modeling to highlight one possible strategy by which knowledge of value space is exploited by animals to detect changes in choice-outcome mappings and proactively update their behavior in response.

During the course of evolution, a species’ environment shapes its sensory abilities, as individuals with more optimized sensory abilities are more likely survive and procreate. Adaptations to the statistics of the natural environment can be observed along the early visual pathway and across species. Therefore, characterising the properties of natural environments and studying the representation of natural scenes along the visual pathway is crucial for advancing our understanding of the structure and function of the visual system. In the past 20 years, mice have become an important model in vision research, but the fact that they live in a different environment than primates and have different visual needs is rarely considered. One particular challenge for characterising the mouse’s visual environment is that they are dichromats with photoreceptors that detect UV light, which the typical camera does not record. This also has consequences for experimental visual stimulation, as the blue channel of computer screens fails to excite mouse UV cone photoreceptors. In my talk, I will describe our approach to recording “colour” footage of the habitat of mice – from the mouse’s perspective – and to studying retinal circuits in the ex vivo retina with natural movies.

The remarkable cognitive abilities characterizing humans has been linked to unique patterns of connectivity characterizing the neocortex. Comparative studies have shown that human cortical pyramidal neurons (PN) receive a significant increase of synaptic inputs when compared to other mammals, including non-human primates and rodents, but how this may relate to changes in cortical connectivity and function remained largely unknown. We previously identified a human-specific gene duplication (HSGD), SRGAP2C, that, when induced in mouse cortical PNs drives human-specific features of synaptic development, including a correlated increase in excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I) synapse density through inhibition of the ancestral SRGAP2A protein (Charrier et al. 2012; Fossatti et al. 2016; Schmidt et al. 2019). However, the origin and nature of this increased connectivity and its impact on cortical circuit function was unknown. I will present new results exploring these questions (see Schmidt et al. (2020) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/852970v1). Using a combination of transgenic approaches and quantitative monosynaptic tracing, we discovered that humanization of SRGAP2C expression in the mouse cortex leads to a specific increase in local and long-range cortico-cortical inputs received by layer 2/3 cortical PNs. Moreover, using in vivo two-photon imaging in the barrel cortex of awake mice, we show that humanization of SRGAP2C expression increases the reliability and selectivity of sensory- evoked responses in layer 2/3 PNs. We also found that mice humanized for SRGAP2C in all cortical pyramidal neurons and throughout development are characterized by improved behavioural performance in a novel whisker-based sensory discrimination task compared to control wild-type mice. Our results suggest that the emergence of SRGAP2C during human evolution underlie a new substrate for human brain evolution whereby it led to increased local and long-range cortico-cortical connectivity and improved reliability of sensory-evoked cortical coding. References cited Charrier C.*, Joshi K. *, Coutinho-Budd J., Kim, J-E., Lambert N., de Marchena, J., Jin W-L., Vanderhaeghen P., Ghosh A., Sassa T, and Polleux F. (2012) Inhibition of SRGAP2 function by its human-specific paralogs induces neoteny of spine maturation. Cell 149:923-935. * Co-first authors. Fossati M, Pizzarelli R, Schmidt ER, Kupferman JV, Stroebel D, Polleux F*, Charrier C*. (2016) SRGAP2 and Its Human-Specific Paralog Co-Regulate the Development of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses. Neuron. 91(2):356-69. * Co-senior corresponding authors. Schmidt E.R.E., Kupferman J.V., Stackmann M., Polleux F. (2019) The human-specific paralogs SRGAP2 and SRGAP2C differentially modulate SRGAP2A-dependent synaptic development. Scientific Rep. 9(1):18692. Schmidt E.R.E, Zhao H.T., Hillman E.M.C., Polleux F. (2020) Humanization of SRGAP2C expression increases cortico-cortical connectivity and reliability of sensory-evoked responses in mouse brain. Submitted. See also: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/852970v1