Exposure to sensory regularities in the environment induces the human brain to form expectations about incoming stimuli and remains partially preserved in the absence of consciousness (i.e. coma and sleep). While regularity often refers to stimuli presented at a fixed pace, we recently explored whether auditory prediction extends to pseudo-regular sequences where sensory prediction is induced by locking sound onsets to heartbeat signals and whether it can occur across vigilance states. In a series of experiments in healthy volunteers, we found neural and cardiac evidence of auditory prediction during heartbeat-based auditory regularities in wakefulness and N2 sleep. This process could represent an important mechanism for detecting unexpected stimuli in the environment even in states of limited conscious and attentional resources.

A recent formulation of predictive coding theory proposes that a subset of neurons in each cortical area encodes sensory prediction errors, the difference between predictions relayed from higher cortex and the sensory input. Here, we test for evidence of prediction error responses in spiking responses and local field potentials (LFP) recorded in primary visual cortex and area V4 of macaque monkeys, and in complementary electroencephalographic (EEG) scalp recordings in human participants. We presented a fixed sequence of visual stimuli on most trials, and violated the expected ordering on a small subset of trials. Under predictive coding theory, pattern-violating stimuli should trigger robust prediction errors, but we found that spiking, LFP and EEG responses to expected and pattern-violating stimuli were nearly identical. Our results challenge the assertion that a fundamental computational motif in sensory cortex is to signal prediction errors, at least those based on predictions derived from temporal patterns of visual stimulation.

In this talk I outline the technical challenges and current solutions to layer fMRI. Specifically, I describe our acquisition strategies for maximizing resolution, spatial coverage, time efficiency as well as, perhaps most importantly, vascular specificity. Novel applications from our group, including mapping feedforward and feedback connections to M1 during task and sensory input modulation and S1 during a sensory prediction task are be shown. Layer specific activity in dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex during a working memory task is also demonstrated. Additionally, I’ll show preliminary work on mapping whole brain layer-specific resting state connectivity and hierarchy.