Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity (STDP) is argued to modulate synaptic strength depending on the timing of pre- and postsynaptic spikes. Physiological experiments identified a variety of temporal kernels: Hebbian, anti-Hebbian and symmetrical LTP/LTD. In this work we present a novel plasticity model, the Voltage-Dependent Pathway Model (VDP), which is able to replicate those distinct kernel types and intermediate versions with varying LTP/LTD ratios and symmetry features. In addition, unlike previous models it retains these characteristics for different neuron models, which allows for comparison of plasticity in different neuron types. The plastic updates depend on the relative strength and activation of separately modeled LTP and LTD pathways, which are modulated by glutamate release and postsynaptic voltage. We used the 15 neuron type parametrizations in the GLIF5 model presented by Teeter et al. (2018) in combination with the VDP to simulate a range of standard plasticity protocols including standard STDP experiments, frequency dependency experiments and low frequency stimulation protocols. Slight variation in kernel stability and frequency effects can be identified between the neuron types, suggesting that the neuron type may have an effect on the effective learning rule. This plasticity model builds a middle ground between biophysical and phenomenological models allowing not just for the combination with more complex and biophysical neuron models, but is also computationally efficient so can be used in network simulations. Therefore it offers the possibility to explore the functional role of the different kernel types and electrophysiological differences in heterogeneous networks in future work.

Rhythmic activity in the brain has been reported in relation to a wide range of cognitive processes. Changes in the rhythmic activity have been related to pathological states. These observations raise the question of the origin of these rhythms: can the mechanisms responsible for generation of these rhythms and that allow the propagation of the rhythmic signal be acquired via a process of learning? In my talk I will focus on spike timing dependent plasticity (STDP) and examine under what conditions this unsupervised learning rule can facilitate the propagation of rhythmic activity downstream in the central nervous system. Next, the I will apply the theory of STDP to the whisker system and demonstrate how STDP can shape the distribution of preferred phases of firing in a downstream population. Interestingly, in both these cases STDP dynamics does not relax to a fixed-point solution, rather the synaptic weights remain dynamic. Nevertheless, STDP allows for the system to retain its functionality in the face of continuous remodeling of the entire synaptic population.

A wealth of experimental studies show that the trial-to-trial variability of neuronal activity is quenched during stimulus evoked responses. This fact has helped ground a popular view that the variability of spiking activity can be decomposed into two components. The first is due to irregular spike timing conditioned on the firing rate of a neuron (i.e. a Poisson process), and the second is the trial-to-trial variability of the firing rate itself. Quenching of the variability of the overall response is assumed to be a reflection of a suppression of firing rate variability. Network models have explained this phenomenon through a variety of circuit mechanisms. However, in all cases, from the vantage of a neuron embedded within the network, quenching of its response variability is inherited from its synaptic input. We analyze in vivo whole cell recordings from principal cells in layer (L) 2/3 of mouse visual cortex. While the variability of the membrane potential is quenched upon stimulation, the variability of excitatory and inhibitory currents afferent to the neuron are amplified. This discord complicates the simple inheritance assumption that underpins network models of neuronal variability. We propose and validate an alternative (yet not mutually exclusive) mechanism for the quenching of neuronal variability. We show how an increase in synaptic conductance in the evoked state shunts the transfer of current to the membrane potential, formally decoupling changes in their trial-to-trial variability. The ubiquity of conductance based neuronal transfer combined with the simplicity of our model, provides an appealing framework. In particular, it shows how the dependence of cellular properties upon neuronal state is a critical, yet often ignored, factor. Further, our mechanism does not require a decomposition of variability into spiking and firing rate components, thereby challenging a long held view of neuronal activity.

Firing-rate (FR) or neural-mass models are widely used for studying computations performed by neural populations. Despite their success, classical firing-rate models do not capture spike timing effects on the microscopic level such as spike synchronization and are difficult to link to spiking data in experimental recordings. For large neuronal populations, the gap between the spiking neuron dynamics on the microscopic level and coarse-grained FR models on the population level can be bridged by mean-field theory formally valid for infinitely many neurons. It remains however challenging to extend the resulting mean-field models to finite-size populations with biologically realistic neuron numbers per cell type (mesoscopic scale). In this talk, I present a mathematical framework for mesoscopic populations of generalized integrate-and-fire neuron models that accounts for fluctuations caused by the finite number of neurons. To this end, I will introduce the refractory density method for quasi-renewal processes and show how this method can be generalized to finite-size populations. To demonstrate the flexibility of this approach, I will show how synaptic short-term plasticity can be incorporated in the mesoscopic mean-field framework. On the other hand, the framework permits a systematic reduction to low-dimensional FR equations using the eigenfunction method. Our modeling framework enables a re-examination of classical FR models in computational neuroscience under biophysically more realistic conditions.