Understanding how brains learn requires bridging evidence across scales—from behaviour and neural circuits to cells, synapses, and molecules. In our work, we use computational modelling and data analysis to explore how the physical properties of neurons and neural circuits constrain learning. These include limits imposed by brain wiring, energy availability, molecular noise, and the 3D structure of dendritic spines. In this talk I will describe one such project testing if wiring motifs from fly brain connectomes can improve performance of reservoir computers, a type of recurrent neural network. The hope is that these insights into brain learning will lead to improved learning algorithms for artificial systems.

Learning is known to induce the formation of new dendritic spines, but despite decades of effort, the functional properties of new spines in vivo remain unknown. Here, using a combination of longitudinal in vivo 2-photon imaging of the glutamate reporter, iGluSnFR, and correlated electron microscopy (CLEM) of dendritic spines on the apical dendrites of L2/3 excitatory neurons in the motor cortex during motor learning, we describe a framework of new spines' formation, survival, and resulting function. Specifically, our data indicate that the potentiation of a subset of clustered, pre-existing spines showing task-related activity in early sessions of learning creates a micro-environment of plasticity within dendrites, wherein multiple filopodia sample the nearby neuropil, form connections with pre-existing boutons connected to allodendritic spines, and are then selected for survival based on co-activity with nearby task-related spines. Thus, the formation and survival of new spines is determined by the functional micro-environment of dendrites. After formation, new spines show preferential co-activation with nearby task-related spines. This synchronous activity is more specific to movements than activation of the individual spines in isolation, and further, is coincident with movements that are more similar to the learned pattern. Thus, new spines functionally engage with their parent clusters to signal the learned movement. Finally, by reconstructing the axons associated with new spines, we found that they synapse with axons previously unrepresented in these dendritic domains, suggesting that the strong local co-activity structure exhibited by new spines is likely not due to axon sharing. Thus, learning involves the binding of new information streams into functional synaptic clusters to subserve the learned behavior.

CA3-CA1 synapses in the hippocampus are the initial locus of episodic memory. The action of acetylcholine alters cellular excitability, modifies neuronal networks, and triggers secondary signaling that directly affects long-term plasticity (LTP) (the cellular underpinning of memory). It is therefore considered a critical regulator of learning and memory in the brain. Its action via M4 metabotropic receptors in the presynaptic terminal of the CA3 neurons and M1 metabotropic receptors in the postsynaptic spines of CA1 neurons produce rich dynamics across multiple timescales. We developed a model to describe the activation of postsynaptic M1 receptors that leads to IP3 production from membrane PIP2 molecules. The binding of IP3 to IP3 receptors in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) ultimately causes calcium release. This calcium release from the ER activates potassium channels like the calcium-activated SK channels and alters different aspects of synaptic signaling. In an independent signaling cascade, M1 receptors also directly suppress SK channels and the voltage-activated KCNQ2/3 channels, enhancing post-synaptic excitability. In the CA3 presynaptic terminal, we model the reduction of the voltage sensitivity of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) and the resulting suppression of neurotransmitter release by the action of the M4 receptors. Our results show that the reduced initial release probability because of acetylcholine alters short-term plasticity (STP) dynamics. We characterize the dichotomy of suppressing neurotransmitter release from CA3 neurons and the enhanced excitability of the postsynaptic CA1 spine. Mechanisms underlying STP operate over a few seconds, while those responsible for LTP last for hours, and both forms of plasticity have been linked with very distinct functions in the brain. We show that the concurrent suppression of neurotransmitter release and increased sensitivity conserves neurotransmitter vesicles and enhances the reliability in plasticity. Our work establishes a relationship between STP and LTP coordinated by neuromodulation with acetylcholine.

Dysregulation of emotional processing and its integration with cognitive functions are central features of many mental/emotional disorders associated both with externalizing problems (aggressive, antisocial behaviors) and internalizing problems (anxiety, depression). As Dr. Joseph LeDoux, our invited speaker of this program, wrote in his famous book “Synaptic self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are”—the brain’s synapses—are the channels through which we think, act, imagine, feel, and remember. Synapses encode the essence of personality, enabling each of us to function as a distinctive, integrated individual from moment to moment. Thus, exploring the functioning of synapses leads to the understanding of the mechanism of (patho)physiological function of our brain. In this context, we have investigated the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders, with particular emphasis on the synaptic function of model mice of various psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, autism, depression, and PTSD. Our current interest is how synaptic inputs are integrated to generate the action potential. Because the spatiotemporal organization of neuronal firing is crucial for information processing, but how thousands of inputs to the dendritic spines drive the firing remains a central question in neuroscience. We identified a distinct pattern of synaptic integration in the disease-related models, in which extra-large (XL) spines generate NMDA spikes within these spines, which was sufficient to drive neuronal firing. We experimentally and theoretically observed that XL spines negatively correlated with working memory. Our work offers a whole new concept for dendritic computation and network dynamics, and the understanding of psychiatric research will be greatly reconsidered. The second half of my talk is the development of a novel synaptic tool. Because, no matter how beautifully we can illuminate the spine morphology and how accurately we can quantify the synaptic integration, the links between synapse and brain function remain correlational. In order to challenge the causal relationship between synapse and brain function, we established AS-PaRac1, which is unique not only because it can specifically label and manipulate the recently potentiated dendritic spine (Hayashi-Takagi et al, 2015, Nature). With use of AS-PaRac1, we developed an activity-dependent simultaneous labeling of the presynaptic bouton and the potentiated spines to establish “functional connectomics” in a synaptic resolution. When we apply this new imaging method for PTSD model mice, we identified a completely new functional neural circuit of brain region A→B→C with a very strong S/N in the PTSD model mice. This novel tool of “functional connectomics” and its photo-manipulation could open up new areas of emotional/psychiatric research, and by extension, shed light on the neural networks that determine who we are.

The synapse is the core component of the nervous system and synapse formation is the critical step in the assembly of neuronal circuits. The assembly and maturation of synapses requires the contribution of secreted and membrane-associated proteins, with neuronal activity playing crucial roles in regulating synaptic strength, neuronal membrane properties, and neural circuit refinement. The molecular mechanisms of synapse assembly and refinement have been so far largely examined on a gene-by-gene basis and with a perspective fully centered on neuronal cells. However, in the last years, the involvement of non-neuronal cells has emerged. Among these, microglia, the resident immune cells of the central nervous system, have been shown to play a key role in synapse formation and elimination. Contacts of microglia with dendrites in the somatosensory cortex were found to induce filopodia and dendritic spines via Ca2+ and actin-dependent processes, while microglia-derived BDNF was shown to promote learning-dependent synapse formation. Microglia is also recognized to have a central role in the widespread elimination (or pruning) of exuberant synaptic connections during development. Clarifying the processes by which microglia control synapse homeostasis is essential to advance our current understanding of brain functions. Clear answers to these questions will have important implications for our understanding of brain diseases, as the fact that many psychiatric and neurological disorders are synaptopathies (i.e. diseases of the synapse) is now widely recognized. In the last years, my group has identified TREM2, an innate immune receptor with phagocytic and antiinflammatory properties expressed in brain exclusively by microglia, as essential for microglia-mediated synaptic refinement during the early stages of brain development. The talk will describe the role of TREM2 in synapse elimination and introduce the molecular actors involved. I will also describe additional pathways by which the immune system may affect the formation and homeostasis of synaptic contacts.

Alzheimer’s Disease is characterised by the accumulation of misfolded proteins, namely amyloid and tau, however it is synapse loss which leads to the cognitive impairments associated with the disease. Many studies have focussed on single time points to determine the effects of pathology on synapses however this does not inform on the plasticity of the synapses, that is how they behave in vivo as the pathology progresses. Here we used in vivo two-photon microscopy to assess the temporal dynamics of axonal boutons and dendritic spines in mouse models of tauopathy[1] (rTg4510) and amyloidopathy[2] (J20). This revealed that pre- and post-synaptic components are differentially affected in both AD models in response to pathology. In the Tg4510 model, differences in the stability and turnover of axonal boutons and dendritic spines immediately prior to neurite degeneration was revealed. Moreover, the dystrophic neurites could be partially rescued by transgene suppression. Understanding the imbalance in the response of pre- and post-synaptic components is crucial for drug discovery studies targeting the synapse in Alzheimer’s Disease. To investigate how sub-types of synapses are affected in human tissue, the Multi-‘omics Atlas Project, a UKDRI initiative to comprehensively map the pathology in human AD, will determine the synaptome changes using imaging and synaptic proteomics in human post mortem AD tissue. The use of multiple brain regions and multiple stages of disease will enable a pseudotemporal profile of pathology and the associated synapse alterations to be determined. These data will be compared to data from preclinical models to determine the functional implications of the human findings, to better inform preclinical drug discovery studies and to develop a therapeutic strategy to target synapses in Alzheimer’s Disease[3].

The role of granule cells in olfactory processing is surrounded by several enigmatic observations, such as the existence of reciprocal spines and the mechanisms for GABA release from them, the missing evidence for functional reciprocal connectivity, and the apparently low inhibitory drive of granule cells, both with respect to recurrent and lateral inhibition. Here, I summarize recent results with regard to GABA release, leading to a novel hypothesis on granule cell function that has the potential to resolve most of these enigmas. I predict that granule cells provide dynamically switched lateral inhibition between coactive glomerular columns and thus possibly a means of olfactory combinatorial coding.

The ability of the brain to encode and store information depends on the plastic nature of the individual synapses. The increase and decrease in synaptic strength, mediated through the structural plasticity of the spine, are important for learning, memory, and cognitive function. Dendritic spines are small structures that contain the synapse. They come in a variety of shapes (stubby, thin, or mushroom-shaped) and a wide range of sizes that protrude from the dendrite. These spines are the regions where the postsynaptic biochemical machinery responds to the neurotransmitters. Spines are dynamic structures, changing in size, shape, and number during development and aging. While spines and synapses have inspired neuromorphic engineering, the biophysical events underlying synaptic and structural plasticity of single spines remain poorly understood. Our current focus is on understanding the biophysical events underlying structural plasticity. I will discuss recent efforts from my group — first, a systems biology approach to construct a mathematical model of biochemical signaling and actin-mediated transient spine expansion in response to calcium influx caused by NMDA receptor activation and a series of spatial models to study the role of spine geometry and organelle location within the spine for calcium and cyclic AMP signaling. Second, I will discuss how mechanics of membrane-cytoskeleton interactions can give insight into spine shape region. And I will conclude with some new efforts in using reconstructions from electron microscopy to inform computational domains. I will conclude with how geometry and mechanics plays an important role in our understanding of fundamental biological phenomena and some general ideas on bio-inspired engineering.

The complex morphology of neurons, with synapses located 100’s of microns from the cell body, necessitates the localization of important cell biological machines and processes within dendrites and axons. Using expansion microscopy together with metabolic labeling we have discovered that both postsynaptic spines and presynaptic terminals exhibit rapid translation, which exhibits differential sensitivity to different neurotransmitters and neuromodulators. In addition, we have explored the unique mechanisms neurons use to meet protein demands at synapses, identifying the transcriptome and translatome in the neuropil.