Any sensory experience of the world, from the touch of a caress to the smile on our friend’s face, is embedded in time and it is often associated with the perception of the flow of it. The perception of time is therefore a peculiar sensory experience built without dedicated sensors. How the perception of time and the content of a sensory experience interact to give rise to this unique percept is unclear. A few empirical evidences show the existence of this interaction, for example the speed of a moving object or the number of items displayed on a computer screen can bias the perceived duration of those objects. However, to what extent the coding of time is embedded within the coding of the stimulus itself, is sustained by the activity of the same or distinct neural populations and subserved by similar or distinct neural mechanisms is far from clear. Addressing these puzzles represents a way to gain insight on the mechanism(s) through which the brain represents the passage of time. In my talk I will present behavioral and neuroimaging studies to show how concurrent changes of visual stimulus duration, speed, visual contrast and numerosity, shape and modulate brain’s and pupil’s responses and, in case of numerosity and time, influence the topographic organization of these features along the cortical visual hierarchy.

Cognitive models of timing often include a pacemaker analogue whose ticks are accumulated to form an internal representation of time, and a threshold that determines when a target duration has elapsed. However, clear EEG manifestations of these abstract components have not yet been identified. We measured the EEG of subjects while they performed a temporal bisection task in which they were requested to categorize visual stimuli as short or long in duration. We report an ERP component whose amplitude depends monotonically on the stimulus duration. The relation of the ERP amplitude and stimulus duration can be captured by a simple model, adapted from a known drift-diffusion model for time perception. It includes a noisy accumulator that starts with the stimulus onset and a threshold. If the threshold is reached during stimulus presentation, the stimulus is categorized as "long", otherwise the stimulus is categorized as "short". At the stimulus offset, a response proportional to the distance to the threshold is emitted. This simple model has two parameters that fit both the behavior and ERP amplitudes recorded in the task. Two subsequent experiments replicate and extend this finding to another modality (touch) as well as to different time ranges (subsecond and suprasecond), establishing the described ERP component as a useful handle on the cognitive processes involved in temporal decisions.