To survive in the wild small rodents evolved specialized retinas. To escape predators, looming shadows need to be detected with speed and precision. To evade starvation, small seeds, grass, nuts and insects need to also be detected quickly. Some of these succulent seeds and insects may be camouflaged offering only low contrast targets.Moreover, these challenging tasks need to be accomplished continuously at dusk, night, dawn and daytime. Crossover inhibition is thought to be involved in enhancing contrast detectionin the microcircuits of the inner plexiform layer of the mammalian retina. The AII amacrine cells are narrow field cells that play a key role in crossover inhibition. Our lab studies the synaptic physiology that regulates glycine release from AII amacrine cellsin mouse retina. These interneurons receive excitation from rod and conebipolar cells and transmit excitation to ON-type bipolar cell terminals via gap junctions. They also transmit inhibition via multiple glycinergic synapses onto OFF bipolar cell terminals.AII amacrine cells are thus a central hub of synaptic information processing that cross links the ON and the OFF pathways. What are the functions of crossover inhibition? How does it enhance contrast detection at different ambient light levels? How is the dynamicrange, frequency response and synaptic gain of glycine release modulated by luminance levels and circadian rhythms? How is synaptic gain changed by different extracellular neuromodulators, like dopamine, and by intracellular messengers like cAMP, phosphateand Ca2+ ions from Ca2+ channels and Ca2+ stores? My talk will try to answer some of these questions and will pose additional ones. It will end with further hypothesis and speculations on the multiple roles of crossover inhibition.

We study the dynamics of (inhibitory) balanced networks at varying (i) the level of symmetry in the synaptic connectivity; and (ii) the ariance of the synaptic efficacies (synaptic gain). We find three regimes of activity. For suitably low synaptic gain, regardless of the level of symmetry, there exists a unique stable fixed point. Using a cavity-like approach, we develop a quantitative theory that describes the statistics of the activity in this unique fixed point, and the conditions for its stability. Increasing the synaptic gain, the unique fixed point destabilizes, and the network exhibits chaotic activity for zero or negative levels of symmetry (i.e., random or antisymmetric). Instead, for positive levels of symmetry, there is multi-stability among a large number of marginally stable fixed points. In this regime, ergodicity is broken and the network exhibits non-exponential relaxational dynamics. We discuss the potential relevance of such a “glassy” phase to explain some features of cortical activity.