Properties of memory networks with excitatory-inhibitory assemblies
Classical views suggest that memories are stored in assemblies of excitatory neurons that become strongly interconnected during learning. However, recent experimental and theoretical results have challenged this view, leading to the hypothesis that memories are encoded in assemblies containing both excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I) neurons. Understanding the effects of these E-I assemblies on memory function is therefore essential. Using a biologically constrained model of an olfactory memory network, I will first describe how introducing E-I assemblies reorganizes odor-evoked activity patterns in neural state space. Indeed, the “geometry” of neural activity provides valuable insights about the computational properties of neural networks. I will then describe the behavior of networks with E-I assemblies upon partial manipulation of inhibitory neurons. Finally, I will discuss recent experimental data supporting predictions of the model. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2024-12-18. Recording duration: 00:35:13.
Co-tuned, balanced excitation and inhibition in olfactory memory networks
Odor memories are exceptionally robust and essential for the survival of many species. In rodents, the olfactory cortex shows features of an autoassociative memory network and plays a key role in the retrieval of olfactory memories (Meissner-Bernard et al., 2019). Interestingly, the telencephalic area Dp, the zebrafish homolog of olfactory cortex, transiently enters a state of precise balance during the presentation of an odor (Rupprecht and Friedrich, 2018). This state is characterized by large synaptic conductances (relative to the resting conductance) and by co-tuning of excitation and inhibition in odor space and in time at the level of individual neurons. Our aim is to understand how this precise synaptic balance affects memory function. For this purpose, we build a simplified, yet biologically plausible spiking neural network model of Dp using experimental observations as constraints: besides precise balance, key features of Dp dynamics include low firing rates, odor-specific population activity and a dominance of recurrent inputs from Dp neurons relative to afferent inputs from neurons in the olfactory bulb. To achieve co-tuning of excitation and inhibition, we introduce structured connectivity by increasing connection probabilities and/or strength among ensembles of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. These ensembles are therefore structural memories of activity patterns representing specific odors. They form functional inhibitory-stabilized subnetworks, as identified by the “paradoxical effect” signature (Tsodyks et al., 1997): inhibition of inhibitory “memory” neurons leads to an increase of their activity. We investigate the benefits of co-tuning for olfactory and memory processing, by comparing inhibitory-stabilized networks with and without co-tuning. We find that co-tuned excitation and inhibition improves robustness to noise, pattern completion and pattern separation. In other words, retrieval of stored information from partial or degraded sensory inputs is enhanced, which is relevant in light of the instability of the olfactory environment. Furthermore, in co-tuned networks, odor-evoked activation of stored patterns does not persist after removal of the stimulus and may therefore subserve fast pattern classification. These findings provide valuable insights into the computations performed by the olfactory cortex, and into general effects of balanced state dynamics in associative memory networks.