Anthropology seminars

Reconstructing early hominin locomotion helps explain access to food, water, shelter and mates. This talk applies three-dimensional geometric morphometrics to functional variation in the primate postcranial skeleton. High-dimensional sliding semilandmarks, coherent point drift and weighted spherical harmonics capture external shape and internal structure, providing complementary descriptions of skeletal adaptation. Comparisons across living primates inform reconstructions of early hominin locomotor repertoires and the relationship between skeletal morphology and movement. QLS–CAMBAM hybrid seminar with Christine M. Harper (University of Washington), 2026-10-27, 12:00–13:00 Montréal time. Attend in person at 550 Sherbrooke, Room 189, McGill University, or follow the public Zoom link on the official event page. Open to the university community, including faculty, graduate and undergraduate students.

Rachna Reddy studies relationships among wild chimpanzees and bonobos to investigate adolescence as a period of both vulnerability and resilience. Drawing on more than a decade observing chimpanzees, the presentation brings together biological, anthropological, psychological and neuroscientific perspectives through cross-species empirical research. It connects questions about development in our closest living relatives with understanding the human life course; Reddy’s fellowship work also includes a coming-of-age novel informed by the lives of the chimpanzees she studies.

David Reich examines how sequencing DNA from ancient human remains has changed the reconstruction of population history. Genetic evidence from past cultures can reveal relationships and movements that are difficult to infer from living populations alone, sometimes challenging interpretations based on archaeology, language and written history. The lecture explores what these discoveries imply for understanding shared and complex human ancestries, and how knowledge of the past could inform the study of human health. A discussion with Carl Zimmer connects the research to the interpretation and communication of evidence about human history. The programme extends the paleogenomic research associated with the 2022 medicine prize through recent work on ancient and modern human DNA.

Keolu Fox connects Polynesian wayfinding, evolutionary thought and genomic research through Indigenous Futurism. Genomes of descendants of Pacific navigators can illuminate migration histories and contemporary health challenges, while genetic data can support land reclamation, public health and cultural preservation. The lecture examines community-led research, benefit sharing and Indigenous decision-making as alternatives to extractive genomic practices. Fox also considers mobile genomic technologies that could bring research to remote communities, with applications in conservation genetics and healthcare. The central question is how scientific and technological advances can strengthen Indigenous agency while linking knowledge of the past to future resilience.

How does the dynamic shape of a sound affect its perceived microtiming? In the TIME project, we studied basic aspects of musical microrhythm, exploring both stimulus features and the participants’ enculturated expertise via perception experiments, observational studies of how musicians produce particular microrhythms, and ethnographic studies of musicians’ descriptions of microrhythm. Collectively, we show that altering the microstructure of a sound (“what” the sound is) changes its perceived temporal location (“when” it occurs). Specifically, there are systematic effects of core acoustic factors (duration, attack) on perceived timing. Microrhythmic features in longer and more complex sounds can also give rise to different perceptions of the same sound. Our results shed light on conflicting results regarding the effect of microtiming on the “grooviness” of a rhythm.

How central were psychological features deriving from our visual systems to the early evolution of human visual culture? Art making emerged deep in our evolutionary history, with the earliest art appearing over 100,000 years ago as geometric patterns etched on fragments of ochre and shell, and figurative representations of prey animals flourishing in the Upper Palaeolithic (c. 40,000 – 15,000 years ago). The latter reflects a complex visual process; the ability to represent something that exists in the real world as a flat, two-dimensional image. In this presentation, I argue that pareidolia – the psychological phenomenon of seeing meaningful forms in random patterns, such as perceiving faces in clouds – was a fundamental process that facilitated the emergence of figurative representation. The influence of pareidolia has often been anecdotally observed in Upper Palaeolithic art examples, particularly cave art where the topographic features of cave wall were incorporated into animal depictions. Using novel virtual reality (VR) light simulations, I tested three hypotheses relating to pareidolia in the caves of Upper Palaeolithic cave art in the caves of Las Monedas and La Pasiega (Cantabria, Spain). To evaluate this further, I also developed an interdisciplinary VR eye-tracking experiment, where participants were immersed in virtual caves based on the cave of El Castillo (Cantabria, Spain). Together, these case studies suggest that pareidolia was an intrinsic part of artist-cave interactions (‘conversations’) that influenced the form and placement of figurative depictions in the cave. This has broader implications for conceiving of the role of visual psychological phenomena in the emergence and development of figurative art in the Palaeolithic.

Cristina Rivera Garza examines how personal archives can challenge the erasure associated with gendered and state violence. Drawing on the family papers used in her account of her sister Liliana’s 1990 femicide, she considers how language, punctuation, repetition and playful forms preserve a person’s presence. The lecture connects these close readings with collective memory and the afterlives of femicide. Rivera Garza asks how documentary and writing practices can make victims materially present in public memory, engaging with Christina Sharpe’s concept of archives of breathlessness.

Svante Pääbo explains how DNA recovered from ancient remains opened an experimental route to studying extinct human relatives. The lecture follows the technical challenge of extracting reliable genetic information from small, degraded and contaminated samples, through the reconstruction of Neanderthal genomes and the identification of Denisovans. Comparisons with living people reveal interbreeding between archaic hominins and the ancestors of present-day humans. Pääbo connects those findings to questions about human origins, the genetic changes that distinguish modern humans, and the continuing biological effects of inherited archaic variants. The account shows how methodological advances in paleogenomics changed both the history of human populations and the questions that can be asked about human biology.

Brains do not fossilise, but as they grow and expand during fetal and infant development, they leave an imprint in the bony braincase. Such imprints of fossilised braincases provide direct evidence of brain evolution, but the underlying biological changes have remained elusive. Combining data from fossil skulls, ancient genomes, brain imaging and gene expression helps shed light on the evolutionary changes shaping the human brain. I will highlight two examples separated by more than 3 million years: the evolution of brain growth in Lucy and her kind, and differences between modern humans and Neanderthals.

Individuals vary widely in how they categorize novel phenomena. This individual variation has led canonical theories in cognitive and social science to suggest that communication in large social networks leads populations to construct divergent category systems. Yet, anthropological data indicates that large, independent societies consistently arrive at similar categories across a range of topics. How is it possible for diverse populations, consisting of individuals with significant variation in how they view the world, to independently construct similar categories? Through a series of online experiments, I show how large communication networks within cultures can promote the formation of similar categories across cultures. For this investigation, I designed an online “Grouping Game” to observe how people construct categories in both small and large populations when tasked with grouping together the same novel and ambiguous images. I replicated this design for English-speaking subjects in the U.S. and Mandarin-speaking subjects in China. In both cultures, solitary individuals and small social groups produced highly divergent category systems. Yet, large social groups separately and consistently arrived at highly similar categories both within and across cultures. These findings are accurately predicted by a simple mathematical model of critical mass dynamics. Altogether, I show how large communication networks can filter lexical diversity among individuals to produce replicable society-level patterns, yielding unexpected implications for cultural evolution. In particular, I discuss how participants in both cultures readily harnessed analogies when categorizing novel stimuli, and I examine the role of communication networks in promoting cross-cultural similarities in analogy-making as the key engine of category formation.

Abstracts: https://www.sites.google.com/site/analogylist/cross-cultural-symposium

Drawing on recent findings from evolutionary anthropology and neuroscience, professor Barton will lead us through the amazing story of the evolution of human cognition. Usingstatistical, phylogenetic analyses that tease apart the variation associated with different neural systems and due to different selection pressures, he will be addressing intriguing questions like ‘Why are there so many neurons in the cerebellum?’, ‘Is the neocortex the ‘intelligent’ bit of the brain?’, and ‘What explains that the recognition by humans of emotional expressions is disrupted by trancranial magnetic stimulation of the somatosensory cortex?’ Could, as professor Barton suggests, the cerebellum -modestly concealed beneath the volumetrically dominating neocortex and largely ignored- turn out to be the Cinderella of the study of brain evolution?

Analogies, broadly defined, map novel concepts onto familiar concepts, making them essential for perception, reasoning, and communication. We argue that analogy-building served a critical role in the evolution of cumulative culture, by allowing humans to learn and transmit complex behavioural sequences that would otherwise be too cognitively demanding or opaque to acquire. The emergence of a protolanguage consisting of simple labels would have provided early humans with the cognitive tools to build explicit analogies and to communicate them to others. This focus on analogy-building can shed new light on the coevolution of cognition and culture, and addresses recent calls for better integration of the field of cultural evolution with cognitive science. This talk will address what cumulative cultural evolution is, how we define analogy-building, how analogy-building applies to cumulative cultural evolution, how analogy-building fits into language evolution, and the implications of analogy-building for causal understanding and cognitive evolution.

How can people coordinate their actions or make joint decisions? One possibility is that each person attempts to predict the actions of the other(s), and best-responds accordingly. But this can lead to bad outcomes, and sometimes even vicious circularity. An alternative view is that each person attempts to work out what the two or more players would agree to do, if they were to bargain explicitly. If the result of such a "virtual" bargain is "obvious," then the players can simply play their respective roles in that bargain. I suggest that virtual bargaining is essential to genuinely social interaction (rather than viewing other people as instruments), and may even be uniquely human. This approach aims to respect methodological individualism, a key principle in many areas of social science, while explaining how human groups can, in a very real sense, be "greater" than the sum of their individual members.

Narratives of human evolution have focused on cortical expansion and increases in brain size relative to body size, but considered that changes in life history, such as in age at sexual maturity and thus the extent of childhood and maternal dependence, or maximal longevity, are evolved features that appeared as consequences of selection for increased brain size, or increased cognitive abilities that decrease mortality rates, or due to selection for grandmotherly contribution to feeding the young. Here I build on my recent finding that slower life histories universally accompany increased numbers of cortical neurons across warm-blooded species to propose a simpler framework for human evolution: that slower development to sexual maturity and increased post-maturity longevity are features that do not require selection, but rather inevitably and immediately accompany evolutionary increases in numbers of cortical neurons, thus fostering human social interactions and cultural and technological evolution as generational overlap increases.

Humans are biologically adapted for cultural life in ways that other primates are not. Humans have unique motivations and cognitive skills for sharing emotions, experience, and collaborative actions (shared intentionality). These motivations and skills first emerge in human ontogeny at around one year of age, as infants begin to participate with other persons in various kinds of collaborative and joint attentional activities, including linguistic communication. Our nearest primate relatives understand important aspects of intentional action - especially in competitive situations - but they do not seem to have the motivations and cognitive skills necessary to engage in activities involving collaboration, shared intentionality, and, in general, things cultural.

Desde la investigación en antropología evolutiva, las neurociencias del comportamiento parental y los estudios de cohortes de orfelinatos, los nuevos conocimientos confluyen en la mayor importancia critica del periodo postnatal inmediato para el desarrollo social humano. Surge la explicación biológica de la interdependencia de los cambios comportamentales en los adultos que crían y el recién nacido: Nature of Nurture. Del concepto unidireccional clásico de la necesidad de estimular un cerebro inmaduro, se comienza a comprender la naturaleza de la interacción en red entre el cerebro neonatal y el cerebro parental que también debe ser estimulado. Concebir, engendra y criar son etapas sucesivas de la reproducción pero no indispensablemente continuas. La función parental es primariamente dependiente de la disponibilidad para cuidar al recién nacido.

Amitav Ghosh considers why societies have struggled to imagine and respond to global warming. He argues that fiction has helped shape the priorities and consumption patterns of the modern world while often failing to confront the realities of climate change. The lecture connects stories of ordinary people and imperial histories with the cultural conditions of the climate crisis. Ghosh questions approaches that place responsibility only on individual conscience, arguing that the scale of the problem demands a collective response. His account asks how literature, public imagination and historical understanding can contribute to that response.