cohort study
Latest
Continued HIV Production From Infected Macrophage In People On ART
PROJECT ABSTRACT After a few weeks of antiretroviral therapy (ART), HIV-1 RNA often decays to undetectable levels in blood. The initial decay is typically rapid due to the loss of short-lived, HIV-infected CD4+ T cells, but despite being adherent to ART, some people experience a subsequent period of slower decay and may require months to years to reach virologic suppression. The clinical significance of ‘slow decay’ of HIV-1 RNA after starting ART is currently unknown. Assessing the clinical significance of ‘slow decay virus’ requires identify the mechanisms generating it and exploring whether there is ongoing inflammation and neuronal damage in these people. There are three potential mechanisms that may generate ‘slow decay virus’ and they may have very different clinical implications. (1) Continued HIV-1 replication due to ineffective ART, poor ART adherence or drug- resistance. (2) Alternatively, ART could stop HIV-1 replication, but HIV-1 virions may continue to be produced by HIV-infected CD4+ T cells or (3) macrophage. Virus production without replication that emerges at the time of ART initiation is called primary nonsuppresible viremia (NSV) and is mechanistically distinct from secondary NSV observed in people who were previously suppressed. We recently examined four people who required approximately a year to become suppressed and found that ART stopped HIV-1 replication, but HIV-infected macrophage continued to produce substantial amounts of virus. These preliminary results are consistent with the long-held belief that after starting ART there is a period of rapid viral decay due to loss of HIV-infected CD4+ T cells, but some people have a subsequent period of slower decay due to continued virus production from long- lived, HIV-infected macrophage. The proposed work will expand on these observations and examine the mechanisms generating ‘slow decay virus’ in a much larger cohort of people on ART and explore the clinical implications of having ‘slow decay virus’ after starting ART (i.e. primary NSV). We will use existing, archived, longitudinal blood samples from 99 people in the MACS/WIHS Combined Cohort Study (MWCCS) who did not suppress HIV-1 RNA to undetectable levels by 6 months on ART (i.e. people with ‘slow decay virus’) and samples from 30 people who suppressed virus with typical, rapid kinetics. The proposed experiments will identify the mechanisms generating ‘slow decay virus’ during ART and the clinical implications of ‘slow decay virus’ (Aim 1). In our previous study, we also observed that ‘slow decay virus’ produced by macrophage often had nonsense/frameshift mutations in the HIV-1 vpr gene that may have promoted continued HIV-1 production from macrophage during ART. Specifically, we will explore whether ‘slow decay virus’ populations produced by macrophage have mutations in vpr or other genes that impact macrophage survival and/or HIV-1 production from infected macrophage (Aim 2). We will accomplish these aims using cutting-edge, but highly rigorous approaches. Accomplishing these aims will address clinical concerns about ‘slow decay virus’, the source of ‘slow decay virus’ as well as the role that Vpr plays in HIV-1 persistence and expression in macrophage during ART.
When to stop immune checkpoint inhibitor for malignant melanoma? Challenges in emulating target trials
Observational data have become a popular source of evidence for causal effects when no randomized controlled trial exists, or to supplement information provided by those. In practice, a wide range of designs and analytical choices exist, and one recent approach relies on the target trial emulation framework. This framework is particularly well suited to mimic what could be obtained in a specific randomized controlled trial, while avoiding time-related selection biases. In this abstract, we present how this framework could be useful to emulate trials in malignant melanoma, and the challenges faced when planning such a study using longitudinal observational data from a cohort study. More specifically, two questions are envisaged: duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and trials comparing treatment strategies for BRAF V600-mutant patients (targeted therapy as 1st line, followed by immunotherapy as 2nd line, vs. immunotherapy as 2nd line followed by targeted therapy as 1st line). Using data from 1027 participants to the MELBASE cohort, we detail the results for the emulation of a trial where immune checkpoint inhibitor would be stopped at 6 months vs. continued, in patients in response or with stable disease.
Two pathways to self-harm in adolescence
The behavioural and emotional profiles underlying adolescent self-harm, and its developmental risk factors, are relatively unknown. The authors of this paper aimed to identify sub-groups of young people who self-harm (YPSH) and longitudinal predictors leading to self-harm using the Millennium Cohort Study. (Pre-print: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.10.20150789v1)
Longitudinal effect of psychiatric medication on suicidal ideation: A prospective cohort study
Network Analysis between Suicide-Related Symptoms and Suicide Attempt Risk in Psychotic Disorder and Mood Disorder: A prospective cohort study
Correlation between neuroprotection in a tauopathy environment following trauma and delayed astrogliosis in a cohort study
FENS Forum 2024
Maternal C-reactive protein is associated with white matter alterations in female offspring: A neuroimaging analysis from the FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study
FENS Forum 2024
Waist circumference and all-cause mortality in Parkinson disease: A nationwide population-based cohort study
FENS Forum 2024
cohort study coverage
8 items
Add content
Have a seminar, talk, or paper on cohort study? Post it so others working in this area can find it.
Post content