developmental biology

Chromatin-Based Mechanisms Linking Transcriptional Dysregulation to Genome Instability in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

PROJECT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT Neurons depend on a finely tuned interplay between chromatin regulation and genome maintenance, yet they are acutely vulnerable to DNA damage generated during activity-dependent transcription of long, synaptic genes. Disruption of this balance is increasingly recognized as a driver of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disability, and epilepsy. High-confidence genetic studies converge on regulators of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methylation, such as the writers ASHIL and Klv1T2C and the eraser KDNISB, as recurrently mutated loci in NTIDs. The overarching goal of this study is to investigate how dysregulated H3K4 methylation compromises genome integrity in human neurons, thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of NDDs. The central, hypothesis is that coordinated II3K4 methylation safeguards neuronal genomes by maintaining an open chromatin architecture that permits the efficient detection and repair of transcription-coupled DNA lesions. The rationale/Or this study is to define the epigenetic control of DNA repair, which will illuminate a shared pathogenic hub across multiple ~I)D-linked genes. During the mentoredK99 phase, I will define how ASHIL, KMT2C, and KDM5B regulate chromatin structure and DNA repair at baseline and during transcriptional stress. Aim-1: I will use isogenic iPSC-derived cortical neurons with patient-relevant mutations or CRrSPRi knockdowns of these regulators, applying an integrated multi-omic pipeline: CUT&Tag and Micro-C to map H3K4 methylation and 3D chromatin topology. Aim-2: I will use Paired-Damage-seq, and CUT&RUN to chart oxidative lesions, repair synthesis, and recruitment of key repair factors; and RNA-seq to relate damage hotspots to altered gene expression. Aims l and 2 will be performed under the guidance of Dr. Lizarraga and Dr. Morrow, experts in the field of neurodevelopmental biology. My advisory team brings unique and complementary skills, enhancing my knowledge in 3D chromatin structure, transcription-coupled repair, gene editing, and multi-omics analysis. I will utilize these skills in the R00 phase (Aim 3), expanding the framework to include additional H3K4 regulators (e.g., LSD1, KMT2A) and broader neural lineages, thereby developing a comprehensive model. This study is innovative in its integration of single-cell D.NA damage mapping with chromatin topology and transcriptional profiling, enabling a direct and mechanistic connection between disrupted H3K4 methylation and genome instability. By uncovering how H3.K4 methylation prevents transcription-coupled genome instability in the developing brain, this research will address a critical gap in our understanding of NDD mechanisms. This award will enable me to launch an independent research program dedicated to determining mechanisms of chromatin-based processes that maintain genome stability in the developing human brain.

Developmental and evolutionary perspectives on thalamic function

Brain organization and function is a complex topic. We are good at establishing correlates of perception and behavior across forebrain circuits, as well as manipulating activity in these circuits to affect behavior. However, we still lack good models for the large-scale organization and function of the forebrain. What are the contributions of the cortex, basal ganglia, and thalamus to behavior? In addressing these questions, we often ascribe function to each area as if it were an independent processing unit. However, we know from the anatomy that the cortex, basal ganglia, and thalamus, are massively interconnected in a large network. One way to generate insight into these questions is to consider the evolution and development of forebrain systems. In this talk, I will discuss the developmental and evolutionary (comparative anatomy) data on the thalamus, and how it fits within forebrain networks. I will address questions including, when did the thalamus appear in evolution, how is the thalamus organized across the vertebrate lineage, and how can the change in the organization of forebrain networks affect behavioral repertoires.

Evolving Neural Networks

Evolution has shaped neural circuits in a very specific manner, slowly and aimlessly incorporating computational innovations that increased the chances to survive and reproduce of the newly born species. The discoveries done by the Evolutionary Developmental (Evo-Devo) biology field during the last decades have been crucial for our understanding of the gradual emergence of such innovations. In turn, Computational Neuroscience practitioners modeling the brain are becoming increasingly aware of the need to build models that incorporate these innovations to replicate the computational strategies used by the brain to solve a given task. The goal of this workshop is to bring together experts from Systems and Computational Neuroscience, Machine Learning and the Evo-Devo field to discuss if and how knowing the evolutionary history of neural circuits can help us understand the way the brain works, as well as the relative importance of learned VS innate neural mechanisms.

Adult neurogenesis in mouse hippocampus

Dr. Aixa V. Morales has been working for more than 20 years in the field of Developmental Biology and from 2005, she is the PI of the laboratory on “Molecular Control of Neurogenesis” at Cajal Institute. Along these years, she has contributed to understanding the control of neurogenesis during development, the dorsoventral specification of neural progenitors, and the temporal control of the migration of neural crest cells. More recently, her lab interest moved towards understanding modulation of adult neurogenesis. Her lab current interest is the control of quiescence, as a mechanism of long-term neural stem cell maintenance in adult niches.

Synthetic Developmental Biology - Cross-species comparison and manipulation of organoids

Sparks, flames, and inferno: epileptogenesis in the glioblastoma microenvironment

Glioblastoma cells trigger pharmacoresistant seizures that may promote tumor growth and diminish the quality of remaining life. To define the relationship between growth of glial tumors and their neuronal microenvironment, and to identify genomic biomarkers and mechanisms that may point to better prognosis and treatment of drug resistant epilepsy in brain cancer, we are analyzing a new generation of genetically defined CRISPR/in utero electroporation inborn glioblastoma (GBM) tumor models engineered in mice. The molecular pathophysiology of glioblastoma cells and surrounding neurons and untransformed astrocytes are compared at serial stages of tumor development. Initial studies reveal that epileptiform EEG spiking is a very early and reliable preclinical signature of GBM expansion in these mice, followed by rapidly progressive seizures and death within weeks. FACS-sorted transcriptomic analysis of cortical astrocytes reveals the expansion of a subgroup enriched in pro-synaptogenic genes that may drive hyperexcitability, a novel mechanism of epileptogenesis. Using a prototypical GBM IUE model, we systematically define and correlate the earliest appearance of cortical hyperexcitability with progressive cortical tumor cell invasion, including spontaneous episodes of spreading cortical depolarization, innate inflammation, and xCT upregulation in the peritumoral microenvironment. Blocking this glutamate exporter reduces seizure load. We show that the host genome contributes to seizure risk by generating tumors in a monogenic deletion strain (MapT/tau -/-) that raises cortical seizure threshold. We also show that the tumor variant profile determines epilepsy risk. Our genetic dissection approach sets the stage to broadly explore the developmental biology of personalized tumor/host interactions in mice engineered with novel human tumor mutations in specified glial cell lineages.

The recruitment of spatial cells in large-scale space & an AI approach to neural discovery

Prof Caswell Barry, Professorial Research Fellow, Cell & Developmental Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London. He and his team are trying to understand how the brain works - how it creates that experience of being human, and more specifically, how the brain creates, stores, and updates memories for places and events. They are trying to answer this is by studying areas of the brain linked to memory, the hippocampus and associated sections of cortex – by recording the activity of neurons in these areas we can visualise and hopefully understand the processes the trigger memory formation and retrieval.