Topic: memory consolidation

Mechanisms Underlying the Persistence of Cancer-Related Fatigue

Cancer-related fatigue is a prominent and debilitating side effect of cancer and its treatment. It can develop prior to diagnosis, generally peaks during cancer treatment, and can persist long after treatment completion. Its mechanisms are multifactorial, and its expression is highly variable. Unfortunately, treatment options are limited. Our research uses syngeneic murine models of cancer and cisplatin-based chemotherapy to better understand these mechanisms. Our data indicate that both peripherally and centrally processes may contribute to the developmental of fatigue. These processes include metabolic alterations, mitochondrial dysfunction, pre-cachexia, and inflammation. However, our data has revealed that behavioral fatigue can persist even after the toxicity associated with cancer and its treatment recover. For example, running during cancer treatment attenuates kidney toxicity while also delaying recovery from fatigue-like behavior. Additionally, administration of anesthetics known to disrupt memory consolidation at the time treatment can promote recovery, and treatment-related cues can re-instate fatigue after recovery. Cancer-related fatigue can also promote habitual behavioral patterns, as observed using a devaluation task. We interpret this data to suggest that limit metabolic resources during cancer promote the utilization of habit-based behavioral strategies that serve to maintain fatigue behavior into survivorship. This line of work is exciting as it points us toward novel interventional targets for the treatment of persistent cancer-related fatigue.

A biologically plausible inhibitory plasticity rule for world-model learning in SNNs

Memory consolidation is the process by which recent experiences are assimilated into long-term memory. In animals, this process requires the offline replay of sequences observed during online exploration in the hippocampus. Recent experimental work has found that salient but task-irrelevant stimuli are systematically excluded from these replay epochs, suggesting that replay samples from an abstracted model of the world, rather than verbatim previous experiences. We find that this phenomenon can be explained parsimoniously and biologically plausibly by a Hebbian spike time-dependent plasticity rule at inhibitory synapses. Using spiking networks at three levels of abstraction–leaky integrate-and-fire, biophysically detailed, and abstract binary–we show that this rule enables efficient inference of a model of the structure of the world. While plasticity has previously mainly been studied at excitatory synapses, we find that plasticity at excitatory synapses alone is insufficient to accomplish this type of structural learning. We present theoretical results in a simplified model showing that in the presence of Hebbian excitatory and inhibitory plasticity, the replayed sequences form a statistical estimator of a latent sequence, which converges asymptotically to the ground truth. Our work outlines a direct link between the synaptic and cognitive levels of memory consolidation, and highlights a potential conceptually distinct role for inhibition in computing with SNNs.

Active sleep in flies: the dawn of consciousness

The brain is a prediction machine. Yet the world is never entirely predictable, for any animal. Unexpected events are surprising and this typically evokes prediction error signatures in animal brains. In humans such mismatched expectations are often associated with an emotional response as well. Appropriate emotional responses are understood to be important for memory consolidation, suggesting that valence cues more generally constitute an ancient mechanism designed to potently refine and generalize internal models of the world and thereby minimize prediction errors. On the other hand, abolishing error detection and surprise entirely is probably also maladaptive, as this might undermine the very mechanism that brains use to become better prediction machines. This paradoxical view of brain functions as an ongoing tug-of-war between prediction and surprise suggests a compelling new way to study and understand the evolution of consciousness in animals. I will present approaches to studying attention and prediction in the tiny brain of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. I will discuss how an ‘active’ sleep stage (termed rapid eye movement – REM – sleep in mammals) may have evolved in the first animal brains as a mechanism for optimizing prediction in motile creatures confronted with constantly changing environments. A role for REM sleep in emotional regulation could thus be better understood as an ancient sleep function that evolved alongside selective attention to maintain an adaptive balance between prediction and surprise. This view of active sleep has some interesting implications for the evolution of subjective awareness and consciousness.

Imaging memory consolidation in wakefulness and sleep

New memories are initially labile and have to be consolidated into stable long-term representations. Current theories assume that this is supported by a shift in the neural substrate that supports the memory, away from rapidly plastic hippocampal networks towards more stable representations in the neocortex. Rehearsal, i.e. repeated activation of the neural circuits that store a memory, is thought to crucially contribute to the formation of neocortical long-term memory representations. This may either be achieved by repeated study during wakefulness or by a covert reactivation of memory traces during offline periods, such as quiet rest or sleep. My research investigates memory consolidation in the human brain with multivariate decoding of neural processing and non-invasive in-vivo imaging of microstructural plasticity. Using pattern classification on recordings of electrical brain activity, I show that we spontaneously reprocess memories during offline periods in both sleep and wakefulness, and that this reactivation benefits memory retention. In related work, we demonstrate that active rehearsal of learning material during wakefulness can facilitate rapid systems consolidation, leading to an immediate formation of lasting memory engrams in the neocortex. These representations satisfy general mnemonic criteria and cannot only be imaged with fMRI while memories are actively processed but can also be observed with diffusion-weighted imaging when the traces lie dormant. Importantly, sleep seems to hold a crucial role in stabilizing the changes in the contribution of memory systems initiated by rehearsal during wakefulness, indicating that online and offline reactivation might jointly contribute to forming long-term memories. Characterizing the covert processes that decide whether, and in which ways, our brains store new information is crucial to our understanding of memory formation. Directly imaging consolidation thus opens great opportunities for memory research.

Neural mechanisms for memory and emotional processing during sleep

The hippocampus and the amygdala are two structures required for emotional memory. While the hippocampus encodes the contextual part of the memory, the amygdala processes its emotional valence. During Non-REM sleep, the hippocampus displays high frequency oscillations called “ripples”. Our early work shows that the suppression of ripples during sleep impairs performance on a spatial task, underlying their crucial role in memory consolidation. We more recently showed that the joint amygdala-hippocampus activity linked to aversive learning is reinstated during the following Non-REM sleep epochs, specifically during ripples. This mechanism potentially sustains the consolidation of aversive associative memories during Non REM sleep. On the other hand, REM sleep is associated with regular 8 Hz theta oscillations, and is believed to play a role in emotional processing. A crucial, initial step in understanding this role is to unravel sleep dynamics related to REM sleep in the hippocampus-amygdala network

Spatiotemporal patterns of neocortical activity around hippocampal sharp-wave ripples

Neocortical-hippocampal interactions during off-line periods such as slow-wave sleep are implicated in memory processing. In particular, recent memory traces are replayed in hippocampus during some sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events, and these replay events are positively correlated with neocortical memory trace reactivation. A prevalent model is that SWR arise ‘spontaneously’ in CA3 and propagate recent memory ‘indices’ outward to the neocortex to enable memory consolidation there; however, the spatiotemporal distribution of neocortical activation relative to SWR is incompletely understood. We used wide-field optical imaging to study voltage and glutamate release transients in dorsal neocortex in relation to CA1 multiunit activity (MUA) and SWR of sleeping and urethane anesthetized mice. Modulation of voltage and glutamate release signals in relation to SWRs varied across superficial neocortical regions, and it was largest in posteromedial regions surrounding retrosplenial cortex (RSC), which receives strong hippocampal output connections. Activity tended to spread sequentially from more medial towards more lateral regions. Contrary to the unidirectional hypothesis, activation exhibited a continuum of timing relative to SWRs, varying from neocortex leading to neocortex lagging the SWRs (± ~250 msec). The timing continuum was correlated with the skewness of peri-SWR hippocampal MUA and with a tendency for some SWR to occur in clusters. Thus, contrary to the model in which SWRs arise spontaneously in hippocampus, neocortical activation often precedes SWRs and may thus constitute a trigger event in which neocortical information seeds associative reactivation of hippocampal ‘indices’.

Understanding how a hippocampal inhibitory microcircuit contributes to memory consolidation and generalization

Retrieval spikes: a dendritic mechanism for retrieval-dependent memory consolidation

Sleep features for memory consolidation and network building across the lifespan

The Role of Hippocampal Replay in Memory Consolidation

The hippocampus lies at the centre of a network of brain regions thought to support spatial and episodic memory. Place cells - the principal cell of the hippocampus, represent information about an animal’s spatial location. Yet, during rest and awake quiescence place cells spontaneously recapitulate past trajectories (‘replay’). Replay has been hypothesised to support systems consolidation – the stabilisation of new memories via maturation of complementary cortical memory traces. Indeed, in recent work we found place and grid cells, from the deep medial entorhinal cortex (dMEC, the principal cortical output region of the hippocampus), replayed coherently during rest periods. Importantly, dMEC grid cells lagged place cells by ~11ms; suggesting the coordination may reflect consolidation. Moreover, preliminary data shows that the dMEC-hippocampal coordination strengthens as an animal becomes familiar with a task and that it may be led by directionally modulated cells. Finally, on-going work, in my recently established lab, shows replay may represent the mechanism underlying the maturation of episodic/spatial memory in pre-weanling pups. Together, these results indicate replay may play a central role in ensuring the permanency of memories.

How sleep remodels the brain

50 years ago it was found that sleep somehow made memories better and more permanent, but neither sleep nor memory researchers knew enough about sleep and memory to devise robust, effective tests. Today the fields of sleep and memory have grown and what is now understood is astounding. Still, great mysteries remain. What is the functional difference between the subtly different slow oscillation vs the slow wave of sleep and do they really have opposite memory consolidation effects? How do short spindles (e.g. <0.5 s as in schizophrenia) differ in function from longer ones and are longer spindles key to integrating new memories with old? Is the nesting of slow oscillations together with sleep spindles and hippocampal ripples necessary? What happens if all else is fine but the neurochemical environment is altered? Does sleep become maladaptive and “cement” memories into the hippocampal warehouse where they are assembled, together with all of their emotional baggage? Does maladaptive sleep underlie post-traumatic stress disorder and other stress-related disorders? How do we optimize sleep characteristics for top emotional and cognitive function? State of the art findings and current hypotheses will be presented.

Dentate gyrus inhibitory microcircuit promotes network mechanisms underlying memory consolidation

Differences in population sparsity can explain different memory consolidation speeds

Exploring offline memory consolidation in goal-directed sensorimotor tasks

Locomotor activity shifts the temporal window for cerebellar memory consolidation

Promising Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder treatment based the administration of the QBP1 peptide to block memory consolidation

Revisiting the cerebellar memory consolidation mechanism from AI perspective: The cerebellum as a dual learning machine

Role of hippocampo-prefrontal circuits in fear memory consolidation

The role of noradrenaline in sleep-dependent memory consolidation

The role of Transient Receptor Potential channels in memory consolidation in the passive avoidance task learning model in one-day old chicks

Silent epileptic activities: the missing link between Alzheimer’s disease, disrupted sleep and dysfunctional memory consolidation?

Stress-induced modulation of memory consolidation in the hippocampus-amygdala network during sleep

Study of synaptic plasticity mechanisms underlying memory consolidation in the hippocampo-neocortical network

Synapse-Specific Homo- and Hetero-synaptic LTP-induced Memory Consolidation in The Amygdala

Targeted memory reactivation during post-learning sleep affects memory consolidation within changes of dendritic spine plasticity

Think twice before you keep yourself awake!: The effects of two different sleep deprivation methods on the memory consolidation of object-location memories