Topic: Motor Behavior

Neural circuits for disinhibition in the cerebellum

ABSTRACT Our long-term goal is to understand how the cerebellum adapts and improves movements in response to motor errors. A critical component of this process is signaling from olivary climbing fibers that, by providing strong excitatory drive onto Purkinje cells, induces long-term synaptic plasticity to instantiate corrective adjustments in motor behavior. However, this signaling process is tightly regulated by molecular layer interneurons (MLIs). By strongly inhibiting Purkinje cells, MLIs oppose climbing fiber-driven excitation and gate the induction of corrective plasticity. Thus, for error-driven climbing fiber-induced plasticity and learning to occur effectively, Purkinje cells must undergo disinhibition through the suppression of MLI-mediated input. Notably, MLI ensembles are composed of several subtypes and have a highly structured interconnectivity and are responsive to convergent climbing fiber inputs, suggesting that climbing fiber synchrony- whose functional significance is poorly understood- can selectively engage MLI networks to alter the state of Purkinje cell inhibition. This engagement may balance inhibition and excitation of Purkinje cells during motor errors, creating a circuit mechanism conducive for the acquisition of adaptive learning. The objective of this proposal is to determine how distinct MLI circuits are organized to modulate Purkinje cell excitability through disinhibition in a context-dependent manner, enabling plasticity and learning in response to motor errors. We will employ functional recordings, circuit-targeted activity manipulations, and behavioral analysis to reveal how error-driven instructive signaling emerges from these circuits. In the first aim, we will use in vivo high-density electrophysiology to map functional interactions among MLIs, climbing fibers, and Purkinje cells in the flocculus during the vestibulo-ocular reflex. We will test whether, during motor errors, climbing fibers synchronize their firing to selectively engage disinhibition of Purkinje cells through MLI subtypes in adapting versus non-adapting contexts. In the second aim, we will combine acute slice recordings and molecular anatomy to define direct versus spillover climbing fiber synapses onto MLI subtypes. We will identify synaptic markers and measure climbing-fiber-evoked currents in MLI subtypes, revealing how structural connectivity supports rapid, subtype-specific circuit engagement. In the third aim, we will determine how long-range inputs to the inferior olive, specifically inhibitory projections from the vestibular nuclei, dynamically tune climbing fiber synchrony in vivo and thereby learning through differential engagement of disinhibitory MLI networks. Using functional recording and optogenetic manipulation during the vestibulo- ocular reflex performance, we will establish causal links between climbing fiber synchrony, MLI network state, and adaptive behavior. By fully understanding the logic of instructive signaling, emergent from cerebellar circuit organization and behavioral engagement, we will advance our knowledge of cerebellum-dependent learning processes and provide broader insights into the neural mechanisms of learning and adaptation more generally.

Sensory Consequences of Visual Actions

We use rapid eye, head, and body movements to extract information from a new part of the visual scene upon each new gaze fixation. But the consequences of such visual actions go beyond their intended sensory outcomes. On the one hand, intrinsic consequences accompany movement preparation as covert internal processes (e.g., predictive changes in the deployment of visual attention). On the other hand, visual actions have incidental consequences, side effects of moving the sensory surface to its intended goal (e.g., global motion of the retinal image during saccades). In this talk, I will present studies in which we investigated intrinsic and incidental sensory consequences of visual actions and their sensorimotor functions. Our results provide insights into continuously interacting top-down and bottom-up sensory processes, and they reify the necessity to study perception in connection to motor behavior that shapes its fundamental processes.

The role of high- and low-level factors in smooth pursuit of predictable and random motions

Smooth pursuit eye movements are among our most intriguing motor behaviors. They are able to keep the line of sight on smoothly moving targets with little or no overt effort or deliberate planning, and they can respond quickly and accurately to changes in the trajectory of motion of targets. Nevertheless, despite these seeming automatic characteristics, pursuit is highly sensitive to high-level factors, such as the choices made about attention, or beliefs about the direction of upcoming motion. Investigators have struggled for decades with the problem of incorporating both high- and low-level processes into a single coherent model. This talk will present an overview of the current state of efforts to incorporate high- and low-level influences, as well as new observations that add to our understanding of both types of influences. These observations (in contrast to much of the literature) focus on the directional properties of pursuit. Studies will be presented that show: (1) the direction of smooth pursuit made to pursue fields of noisy random dots depends on the relative reliability of the sensory signal and the expected motion direction; (2) smooth pursuit shows predictive responses that depend on the interpretation of cues that signal an impending collision; and (3) smooth pursuit during a change in target direction displays kinematic properties consistent with the well-known two-thirds power law. Implications for incorporating high- and low-level factors into the same framework will be discussed.

Exploring fine detail: The interplay of attention, oculomotor behavior and visual perception in the fovea

Outside the foveola, visual acuity and other visual functions gradually deteriorate with increasing eccentricity. Humans compensate for these limitations by relying on a tight link between perception and action; rapid gaze shifts (saccades) occur 2-3 times every second, separating brief “fixation” intervals in which visual information is acquired and processed. During fixation, however, the eye is not immobile. Small eye movements incessantly shift the image on the retina even when the attended stimulus is already foveated, suggesting a much deeper coupling between visual functions and oculomotor activity. Thanks to a combination of techniques allowing for high-resolution recordings of eye position, retinal stabilization, and accurate gaze localization, we examined how attention and eye movements are controlled at this scale. We have shown that during fixation, visual exploration of fine spatial detail unfolds following visuomotor strategies similar to those occurring at a larger scale. This behavior compensates for non-homogenous visual capabilities within the foveola and is finely controlled by attention, which facilitates processing at selected foveal locations. Ultimately, the limits of high acuity vision are greatly influenced by the spatiotemporal modulations introduced by fixational eye movements. These findings reveal that, contrary to common intuition, placing a stimulus within the foveola is necessary but not sufficient for high visual acuity; fine spatial vision is the outcome of an orchestrated synergy of motor, cognitive, and attentional factors.

Leveraging olfaction to understand how the brain and the body generate social behavior

Courtship behavior is an innate model for many types of brain computations including sensory detection, learning and memory, and internal state modulation. Despite the robustness of the behavior, we have little understanding of the underlying neural circuits and mechanisms. The Stowers’ lab is leveraging the ability of specialized olfactory cues, pheromones, to specifically activate and therefore identify and study courtship circuits in the mouse. We are interested in identifying general circuit principles (specific brain nodes and information flow) that are common to all individuals, in order to additionally study how experience, gender, age, and internal state modulate and personalize behavior. We are solving two parallel sensory to motor courtship circuits, that promote social vocal calling and scent marking, to study information processing of behavior as a complete unit instead of restricting focus to a single brain region. We expect comparing and contrasting the coding logic of two courtship motor behaviors will begin to shed light on general principles of how the brain senses context, weighs experience and responds to internal state to ultimately decide appropriate action.

Contextual inference underlies the learning of sensorimotor repertoires

Humans spend a lifetime learning, storing and refining a repertoire of motor memories. However, it is unknown what principle underlies the way our continuous stream of sensori-motor experience is segmented into separate memories and how we adapt and use this growing repertoire. Here we develop a principled theory of motor learning based on the key insight that memory creation, updating, and expression are all controlled by a single computation – contextual inference. Unlike dominant theories of single-context learning, our repertoire-learning model accounts for key features of motor learning that had no unified explanation and predicts novel phenomena, which we confirm experimentally. These results suggest that contextual inference is the key principle underlying how a diverse set of experiences is reflected in motor behavior.

Cholecystokininergic signaling exerts major control on cortico-striatal synaptic plasticity and motor behavior

Locus Coeruleus mediated State switch in Brain State during Motor Behavior in the Zebrafish Larva