Clinical Trial Readiness of MEG Biomarkers in Children Across the Autism Spectrum
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
PROJECT SUMMARY
Biological and phenotypic heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) poses a major challenge for clinically
focused research and interventions. Brain electrophysiological phenotyping holds promise for parsing this
heterogeneity. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), findings of diminished and delayed auditory evoked
responses (e.g. the ~50ms component, M50 and, specifically, its latency: M50L) have reproducibly been shown
in ASD, with correlation to behavior. Additionally, abnormal resting state activity and network functional
connectivity has been identified as an electrophysiological hallmark. Such passively-acquired signatures may
serve as objective biomarkers in subtyping autistic individuals, including stratifying patients for inclusion in clinical
trials according to biology, rather than behavior alone. However, despite their abundant promise, these measures
are not yet permeating clinical trial design, nor being utilized in clinical practice, in part because of their lack of
standardized implementation and analysis. This proposal seeks to remedy this by using rigorous and
standardized, scalable and sharable methods with two leading MEG measures to determine their measurement-
reliability as well as their sensitivity to inter-individual differences in clinically-relevant aspects of autism features,
general cognitive ability and language and communication. Specifically adopting a 12-week repeated scanning
design, mimicking the duration of a typical pharmaceutical trial or behavioral intervention, we will acquire each
of these two MEG metrics at baseline and 12-week follow-up to assess interval change. Additionally, we will
evaluate test-retest variability with an intermediate measurement point 4-weeks after baseline. As such we will
characterize both intra-subject variability (measurement precision) and inter-subject variability which will be
correlated with dimension axes of autism features, general cognitive ability and language skills, as well as major
co-occurring condition confounds. These studies will recruit a broad range of 240 autistic children, paralleling
the CDC’s prevalence data on intellectual ability and encompassing the group considered as having “profound
autism”. This is enabled by our adoption of MEG-PLAN, a strategy developed over the last decade in our group
and demonstrated to enhance inclusive participation in MEG scanning studies, even in non-verbal participants.
Data will be compared to a control group of age-matched typically-developing peers. The two MEG measures
will also be assessed for their ability to identify clusters of less heterogeneous neurophysiological phenotype as
a novel basis for stratification or subtyping of the heterogeneous autism population. In culmination, this study
addresses key “clinical readiness” aspects of utilization of MEG biomarkers for ASD including profound autism,
for both stratification (inclusion/trial selection) and monitoring of response to intervention, and will, ultimately,
pave the way for the adoption of such biomarkers as adjunctive tests in increasingly-routine clinical practice.