Hemodynamics seminars

Changes in ocular hemodynamics may be indicative of pathological conditions in the eye (e.g. glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration), but also elsewhere in the body (e.g. systemic hypertension, diabetes, neurodegenerative disorders). Thanks to its transparent fluids and structures that allow the light to go through, the eye offers a unique window on the circulation from large to small vessels, and from arteries to veins. Deciphering the causes that lead to changes in ocular hemodynamics in a specific individual could help prevent vision loss as well as aid in the diagnosis and management of diseases beyond the eye. In this talk, we will discuss how mathematical and computational modelling can help in this regard. We will focus on two main factors, namely blood pressure (BP), which drives the blood flow through the vessels, and intraocular pressure (IOP), which compresses the vessels and may impede the flow. Mechanism-driven models translates fundamental principles of physics and physiology into computable equations that allow for identification of cause-to-effect relationships among interplaying factors (e.g. BP, IOP, blood flow). While invaluable for causality, mechanism-driven models are often based on simplifying assumptions to make them tractable for analysis and simulation; however, this often brings into question their relevance beyond theoretical explorations. Data-driven models offer a natural remedy to address these short-comings. Data-driven methods may be supervised (based on labelled training data) or unsupervised (clustering and other data analytics) and they include models based on statistics, machine learning, deep learning and neural networks. Data-driven models naturally thrive on large datasets, making them scalable to a plethora of applications. While invaluable for scalability, data-driven models are often perceived as black- boxes, as their outcomes are difficult to explain in terms of fundamental principles of physics and physiology and this limits the delivery of actionable insights. The combination of mechanism-driven and data-driven models allows us to harness the advantages of both, as mechanism-driven models excel at interpretability but suffer from a lack of scalability, while data-driven models are excellent at scale but suffer in terms of generalizability and insights for hypothesis generation. This combined, integrative approach represents the pillar of the interdisciplinary approach to data science that will be discussed in this talk, with application to ocular hemodynamics and specific examples in glaucoma research.

Much as Santiago Ramón y Cajal is the godfather of neuronal computation, which occurs among neurons that communicate predominantly via threshold logic, Camillo Golgi is the inadvertent godfather of neurovascular signaling, in which the endothelial cells that form the lumen of blood vessels communicate via electrodiffusion as well as threshold logic. I will address questions that define spatiotemporal patterns of constriction and dilation that develop across the network of cortical vasculature: First - is there a common topology and geometry of brain vasculature (our work)? Second - what mechanisms govern neuron-to-vessel and vessel-to-vessel signaling (work of Mark Nelson at U Vermont)? Last - what is the nature of competition among arteriole smooth muscle oscillators and the underlying neuronal drive (our work)? This answers to these questions bear on fundamental aspects of brain science as well as practical issues, including the relation of fMRI signals to neuronal activity and the impact of vascular dysfunction on cognition. Challenges and opportunities for experimentalists and theorists alike will be discussed. The organizer explicitly announced an exceptional 11:15 am ET start. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2023-10-11. Recording duration: 00:56:46.