The Limits of Causal Reasoning in Human and Machine Learning
Cognition seminar by Prof Steven Sloman, Brown University
Hosted by Learning and Reasoning
Wednesday 15:00–16:30 London (GMT+0)
Ended
Abstract
A key purpose of causal reasoning by individuals and by collectives is to enhance action, to give humans yet more control over their environment. As a result, causal reasoning serves as the infrastructure of both thought and discourse. Humans represent causal systems accurately in some ways, but also show some systematic biases (we tend to neglect causal pathways other than the one we are thinking about). Even when accurate, people’s understanding of causal systems tends to be superficial; we depend on our communities for most of our causal knowledge and reasoning. Nevertheless, we are better causal reasoners than machines. Modern machine learners do not come close to matching human abilities.
Topics
Show 2 more topics
Related seminars
The neural dynamics of causal Inference across the cortical hierarchy
Related research
A Functional Approach to Analogical Reasoning in Scientific Practice
Related research
Towards a Theory of Human Visual Reasoning
Related research