Skip to content

The Limits of Causal Reasoning in Human and Machine Learning

Cognition seminar by Prof Steven Sloman, Brown University

Hosted by Learning and Reasoning

Wednesday 15:00–16:30 London (GMT+0)

Ended

Providence, RI, USA · Hybrid

Abstract

A key purpose of causal reasoning by individuals and by collectives is to enhance action, to give humans yet more control over their environment. As a result, causal reasoning serves as the infrastructure of both thought and discourse. Humans represent causal systems accurately in some ways, but also show some systematic biases (we tend to neglect causal pathways other than the one we are thinking about). Even when accurate, people’s understanding of causal systems tends to be superficial; we depend on our communities for most of our causal knowledge and reasoning. Nevertheless, we are better causal reasoners than machines. Modern machine learners do not come close to matching human abilities.

Topics

action enhancementcausal pathwayscausal reasoningcausal systemscommunity knowledgediscourse infrastructurehuman cognitionmachine learning
Show 2 more topics
reasoningsystematic biases

We use cookies for analytics.