Domains featuring this topic
Explore the domains where this topic appears.
BrainLM Journal Club
Connor Lane will lead a journal club on the recent BrainLM preprint, a foundation model for fMRI trained using self-supervised masked autoencoder training. Preprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.12.557460v1 Tweeprint: https://twitter.com/david_van_dijk/status/1702336882301112631?t=Q2-U92-BpJUBh9C35iUbUA&s=19
Algonauts 2023 winning paper journal club (fMRI encoding models)
Algonauts 2023 was a challenge to create the best model that predicts fMRI brain activity given a seen image. Huze team dominated the competition and released a preprint detailing their process. This journal club meeting will involve open discussion of the paper with Q/A with Huze. Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.01175.pdf Related paper also from Huze that we can discuss: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.14021.pdf
Bidirectionally connected cores in a mouse connectome: Towards extracting the brain subnetworks essential for consciousness
Where in the brain consciousness resides remains unclear. It has been suggested that the subnetworks supporting consciousness should be bidirectionally (recurrently) connected because both feed-forward and feedback processing are necessary for conscious experience. Accordingly, evaluating which subnetworks are bidirectionally connected and the strength of these connections would likely aid the identification of regions essential to consciousness. Here, we propose a method for hierarchically decomposing a network into cores with different strengths of bidirectional connection, as a means of revealing the structure of the complex brain network. We applied the method to a whole-brain mouse connectome. We found that cores with strong bidirectional connections consisted of regions presumably essential to consciousness (e.g., the isocortical and thalamic regions, and claustrum) and did not include regions presumably irrelevant to consciousness (e.g., cerebellum). Contrarily, we could not find such correspondence between cores and consciousness when we applied other simple methods which ignored bidirectionality. These findings suggest that our method provides a novel insight into the relation between bidirectional brain network structures and consciousness. Our recent preprint on this work is here: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.12.452022.
Why does online collaboration work? Insights into sequential collaboration
The last two decades have seen a rise in online projects such as Wikipedia or OpenStreetMap in which people collaborate to create a common product. Contributors in such projects often work together sequentially. Essentially, the first contributor generates an entry (e.g., a Wikipedia article) independently which is then adjusted in the following by other contributors by adding or correcting information. We refer to this way of working together as sequential collaboration. This process has not yet been studied in the context of judgment and decision making even though research has demonstrated that Wikipedia and OpenStreetMap yield very accurate information. In this talk, I give first insights into the structure of sequential collaboration, how adjusting each other’s judgments can yield more accurate final estimates, which boundary conditions need to be met, and which underlying mechanisms may be responsible for successful collaboration. A preprint is available at https://psyarxiv.com/w4xdk/
Cortical and subcortical grey matter micro-structure is associated with polygenic risk for schizophrenia
Background: Recent discovery of hundreds of common gene variants associated with schizophrenia has enabled polygenic risk scores (PRS) to be measured in the population. It is hypothesized that normal variation in genetic risk of schizophrenia should be associated with MRI changes in brain morphometry and tissue composition. Methods: We used the largest extant genome-wide association dataset (N = 69,369 cases and N = 236,642 healthy controls) to measure PRS for schizophrenia in a large sample of adults from the UK Biobank (Nmax = 29,878) who had multiple micro- and macro-structural MRI metrics measured at each of 180 cortical areas and seven subcortical structures. Linear mixed effect models were used to investigate associations between schizophrenia PRS and brain structure at global and regional scales, controlled for multiple comparisons. Results: Micro-structural phenotypes were more robustly associated with schizophrenia PRS than macro-structural phenotypes. Polygenic risk was significantly associated with reduced neurite density index (NDI) at global brain scale, at 149 cortical regions, and five subcortical structures. Other micro-structural parameters, e.g., fractional anisotropy, that were correlated with NDI were also significantly associated with schizophrenia PRS. Genetic effects on multiple MRI phenotypes were co-located in temporal, cingulate and prefrontal cortical areas, insula, and hippocampus. (Preprint: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.06.21251073v1)
An Algorithmic Barrier to Neural Circuit Understanding
Neuroscience is witnessing extraordinary progress in experimental techniques, especially at the neural circuit level. These advances are largely aimed at enabling us to understand precisely how neural circuit computations mechanistically cause behavior. Establishing this type of causal understanding will require multiple perturbational (e.g optogenetic) experiments. It has been unclear exactly how many such experiments are needed and how this number scales with the size of the nervous system in question. Here, using techniques from Theoretical Computer Science, we prove that establishing the most extensive notions of understanding need exponentially-many experiments in the number of neurons, in many cases, unless a widely-posited hypothesis about computation is false (i.e. unless P = NP). Furthermore, using data and estimates, we demonstrate that the feasible experimental regime is typically one where the number of experiments performable scales sub-linearly in the number of neurons in the nervous system. This remarkable gulf between the worst-case and the feasible suggests an algorithmic barrier to such an understanding. Determining which notions of understanding are algorithmically tractable to establish in what contexts, thus, becomes an important new direction for investigation. TL; DR: Non-existence of tractable algorithms for neural circuit interrogation could pose a barrier to comprehensively understanding how neural circuits cause behavior. Preprint: https://biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/639724v1/…