Inter-animal transforms as a guide to model-brain comparison
Computational Neuroscience, Biostatistics, Deep Learning and ePoster by Javier Sagastuy Brena, Aran Nayebi, Daniel Yamins, Imran Thobani and Rosa Cao
Part of COSYNE 2023 posters, Stanford University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); McGovern Institute for Brain Research
Sunday
Poster
Poster audio
Abstract
To address the question of how to compare DNN model activations to brain data, we investigate what transforms best describe similarity in neural activity in the same brain area between conspecifics. We expect neural responses to be functionally highly similar within a species (since we expect findings to generalize across animals). What kind of transform will make such similarity most evident? That is, under what kind of transform are conspecifics’ neural responses highly similar to each other? Researchers often default to linear regression as a reasonable transform class for measuring neural response similarity. We propose an improved transform class that uses a generalized linear model (GLM) whose noise matches the approximately Poisson noise in the neural data, and whose non-linear link function is akin to the activation function of a biological neuron. Incorporating these biologically motivated constraints into the inter-animal transform class substantially improves similarity scores compared to linear regression. We then build a DNN model of mouse visual cortex that swaps out ReLU activations for a more biologically plausible softplus activation function, combined with Poisson noise, to produce activations that are more similar to neural responses. We find that a Poisson GLM whose link function exactly matches the model activation function again yields the highest similarity scores between different randomly seeded instances of our softplus models. This result gives mechanistic insight into why the best performing animal transform class has a non-linear link as well as Poisson noise structure. Moreover, we show that our Poisson GLM not only achieves higher similarity scores for the same layer between model instances, but also scores activations in model layers that are physically far apart as highly dissimilar to each other. Finally, we estimate the number of neurons and number of stimuli that would need to be recorded to accurately estimate inter-animal similarity.
Topics
Details
- Session
- Poster Session III
- Citation
- Javier Sagastuy Brena, Aran Nayebi, Daniel Yamins et al. (2023). Inter-animal transforms as a guide to model-brain comparison. COSYNE 2023. https://doi.org/10.57736/1a37-059a (opens in a new tab)
Related ePosters
- Mar 12, 2023Montreal, Canada
Region-based conversion of neural activity across sessions
Sep 28, 2022OnlineDo better object recognition models improve the generalization gap in neural predictivity?
Mar 19, 2022Lisbon, Portugal
More in Poster Session III
All postersBrain-Rhythm-based Inference (BRyBI) for time-scale invariant speech processing
Mar 12, 2023Olesia Dogonasheva et al.Credit-based self-organization yields cortex-like topography in deep convolutional networks
Mar 12, 2023Amirozhan Dehghani et al.Density-based Neural Decoding using Spike Localization for Neuropixels Recordings
Mar 12, 2023Yizi Zhang et al.Granular retrosplenial cortex high frequency oscillation dynamics in hippocampo-cortical dialogue
Mar 12, 2023Kaiser Arndt et al.
More with Aran Nayebi
All their workMouse visual cortex as a limited resource system that self-learns an ecologically-general representation
Seminar · Video · Nov 2, 2022WWNeuRise