Topic: generalized linear model

To address the question of how to compare DNN model activations to brain data, we investigate what transforms best describe similarity in neural activity in the same brain area between conspecifics. We expect neural responses to be functionally highly similar within a species (since we expect findings to generalize across animals). What kind of transform will make such similarity most evident? That is, under what kind of transform are conspecifics’ neural responses highly similar to each other? Researchers often default to linear regression as a reasonable transform class for measuring neural

Dr Jennifer Lawlor Title: Tracking changes in complex auditory scenes along the cortical pathway Complex acoustic environments, such as a busy street, are characterised by their everchanging dynamics. Despite their complexity, listeners can readily tease apart relevant changes from irrelevant variations. This requires continuously tracking the appropriate sensory evidence while discarding noisy acoustic variations. Despite the apparent simplicity of this perceptual phenomenon, the neural basis of the extraction of relevant information in complex continuous streams for goal-directed behavior is

Information in sensory neurons is conveyed by spiking activity varying in time. This is quantified by the mutual-information rate (MIR), given by $\mathrm{MIR}:=\underset{\Delta t\rightarrow\infty}{\lim}\frac{{\cal I}\left(\Delta t\right)}{\Delta t}$, where ${\cal I}\left(\Delta t\right)$ is the mutual information between the activity of a spiking neuron and a stimulus over a given time window $\Delta t$. To compute it for spiking data, the spike train is typically discretized with a certain bin-size $\mathrm{dt}$. Because $\Delta t/\mathrm{dt}$ is typically well bigger than $1$, there are man