Sequential learning in recurrent neural networks create memory traces of learned tasks
Neuroscience ePoster by Joanna Chang, Claudia Clopath, Juan A Gallego and Juan A. Gallego
Part of COSYNE 2023 posters, Imperial College London
Saturday
Abstract
Animals can learn and perform many behaviors without interference. However, it is unclear how changes in neural activity during learning avoid interference with activity underlying similar behaviors. Recently, Losey et al. (bioRxiv, 2022) identified a possible explanation by examining monkey motor cortical population activity under a brain-computer interface (BCI) paradigm where linear mappings controlled a computer cursor. The activity produced for a known mapping was altered after learning a new mapping in a way that made the activity more beneficial for this new mapping. That is, the activity retained a “memory trace” of the new mapping without compromising the performance for the already known mapping. Since these memory traces suggest a potential substrate for continual learning, we sought to understand how and when they arise.
To probe the effects of different learning processes on the memory trace, we modeled motor cortical neural activity during the same BCI paradigm using a recurrent neural network. We replicated several experimental results by sequentially training the network on two mappings that required activity in the same low-dimensional subspace, or manifold, representing “within-manifold” perturbations. Intriguingly, we observed memory traces even when network activity was not specifically constrained to maintain both maps. Thus, memory traces may inherently arise from sequential learning. While the presence of these traces was consistent across different BCI maps, their magnitudes differed greatly. Initial changes in behavior imposed by a given mapping were a good predictor of the memory trace’s magnitude, but initial changes in network activity were not. This allowed us to characterize, for the first time, differences in learning between different BCI mappings that represent easily-learnable within-manifold perturbations. Overall, we provide a taxonomy of the neural and behavioral factors shaping continual learning, allowing us to examine potential underlying mechanisms and behavioral constraints in future work.
Topics
Details
- Session
- Poster Session II
Related ePosters
Identifying cortical learning algorithms using Brain-Machine Interfaces
Frankfurt, GermanyLearning-to-learn emerges from learning to efficiently reuse neural representations
Mar 18, 2022Lisbon, Portugal
More in Poster Session II
All postersAn accessible hippocampal dataset for benchmarking models of cognitive mapping
Mar 11, 2023Alexandra Keinath et al.AI-driven cholinergic theory enables rapid and robust cortex-wide learning
Mar 11, 2023Maija Filipovica et al.All-Optical Investigation of Schaller Collateral Synapses in vivo
Mar 11, 2023Cynthia Rais et al.Assemblies and the k-Cap Process: The Effects of Locality on Neural Firing Dynamics
Mar 11, 2023Mirabel Reid et al.
More with Joanna Chang
All their workPreserved neural dynamics across animals performing similar behaviour
ePoster · Jun 25, 2024FENS Forum 2024Long-term motor learning creates structure within neural space that shapes motor adaptation
ePoster · Mar 19, 2022COSYNE 2022
More with Claudia Clopath
All their workCan BTSP mediate credit assignment in the hippocampus?
ePoster · Mar 27, 2025COSYNE 2025Movie reconstruction from mouse visual cortex activity
ePoster · Mar 27, 2025COSYNE 2025SIMPL: Scalable and hassle-free optimisation of neural representations from behaviour
ePoster · Mar 27, 2025COSYNE 2025Three-factor gradient-ascent approximation explains local-circuit plasticity during BCI learning
ePoster · Mar 27, 2025COSYNE 2025