NEURAL MECHANISMS OF SPATIAL CHOICE: DCA1 PLASTICITY, CUE PROCESSING & BEHAVIORAL VARIABILITY
Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences
Presentation
Date TBA
Event Information
Poster Board
PS04-08PM-570
Poster
View posterAbstract
Hippocampal synaptic plasticity, in particular long-term potentiation (LTP), has long been considered a central mechanism underlying spatial memory. However, recent evidence from studies in genetically modified mice has challenged this concept, proposing instead that hippocampal plasticity may play a role in spatial decision-making (Bannerman et al., 2012).
To examine the molecular and behavioural determinants of spatial choice, we designed a fully automated behavioural platform that enables continuous tracking of mouse locomotion and navigation. The system comprises three interconnected corridors outfitted with video monitoring, visual and auditory cue modules, automated doors, and liquid reward delivery, allowing animals to explore freely while acquiring rewards.
Using this paradigm, we assessed spatial decision-making in male and female C57BL/6 mice and observed no sex differences in overall performance. We systematically evaluated the contributions of motivational state, cue modality, reward distance, and dorsal CA1 (dCA1) synaptic plasticity. Plasticity was disrupted via lentiviral shRNA-mediated knockdown of the synaptic scaffold protein PSD-95.
Food restriction enhanced motivation, learning efficiency, and choice dynamics, while closer reward placement accelerated acquisition. Cue manipulations in males showed that removal of visual cues impaired performance. PSD-95-dependent dCA1 plasticity emerged as a key regulator of attentional engagement and decision-making strategies.
Notably, animals could be segregated into high-, intermediate-, and low-performing subgroups, indicating inherent differences in decision strategies. To further investigate the neural correlates underlying performance variability between groups, whole-brain c-Fos immunostaining across serial sections was performed.
Collectively, these results elucidate how hippocampal plasticity, environmental information, and individual variability interact to shape spatial decision-making.
Recommended posters
GENETIC BACKGROUND AND AGE INFLUENCE APPETITIVE SPATIAL LEARNING AND DECISION-MAKING IN MICE
Jiaoru Liu, Denise Manahan-Vaughan, Josué Haubrich
UNCOVERING THE NEURAL CIRCUIT MECHANISMS OF CHOICE SELECTION: MANIPULATING THE DYNAMICS OF CHOICE ENGRAM COMPETITION IN THE MOUSE PREFRONTAL CORTEX
Serena Pugliano, Balma Serrano-Porcar, Albert Compte, Carles Sindreu, Jaime de la Rocha, Tomás Ryan
FIRING PATTERNS AND OSCILLATIONS IN PREFRONTAL–HIPPOCAMPAL CIRCUITS IN A NOVEL STRATEGY-SWITCHING TASK FOR MICE NAVIGATING A VIRTUAL REALITY LINEAR MAZE
Alessia De Matteis, Marina Komšić, Thomas Klausberger, Bálint Lasztóczi
HIPPOCAMPAL REPRESENTATIONS OF SPATIAL AND ABSTRACT VARIABLES IN A DYNAMIC CUE-DIRECTED T-MAZE TASK
Afsoon Gharib Mombeini, Adam Lester, Rick Kornelsen, Manu Madhav
DRIFT AND STABILITY IN MEMORY-RELATED ACTIVITY OF HIPPOCAMPAL NEURONS IN A SPATIAL ALTERNATION TASK
Stefan Vintila, Matthias Klumpp, Justus Simon, Andreas Draguhn, Martin Both
LEARNING OF REWARD LOCATIONS UNDER PATH INTEGRATION AND CUE-BASED NAVIGATION
Abolfazl Badripour, Dahee Jung, Sebastien Royer