ePoster

THE ROLE OF BODY-BRAIN INTERACTIONS IN VISUAL AND SOMATOSENSORY PERCEPTION

Ege Kingirand 6 co-authors

Heart and Brain Center Göttingen

FENS Forum 2026 (2026)
Barcelona, Spain
Board PS07-10AM-638

Presentation

Date TBA

Board: PS07-10AM-638

Poster preview

THE ROLE OF BODY-BRAIN INTERACTIONS IN VISUAL AND SOMATOSENSORY PERCEPTION poster preview

Event Information

Poster Board

PS07-10AM-638

Abstract

The brain constantly communicates with the rest of the body, and the cardiorespiratory state modulates our ability to perceive the external world. However, previous studies find a more consistent decrease in perceptual performance during cardiac systole (vs. diastole) in the somatosensory than the visual modality. Preferred respiratory phases at stimulus onset, and pre-stimulus heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEP) also show inconsistent correlations with perceptual performance across studies in these modalities. Our within-subjects study aims to investigate the role of cardiorespiratory signals in visual and somatosensory perception. So far, we recorded EEG, ECG, and respiration signals from non-clinical young adults (N=27*, age: 18-35) during threshold-level visual and somatosensory stimulus detection tasks, with each 300 trials (20% stimulus-absent) split into six modality-interleaved blocks (Figure A). In each trial, participants were presented with a near-threshold (50% detection) stimulus and they gave binary responses for detection (Y:yes / N:no) and confidence (C:confident, U:unconfident). Cardiac phase effect was observed only in the somatosensory modality, with decreased stimulus detection accuracy (hit rate) during systole versus diastole (Figure B-left). Despite modality-indifferent rates of anticipatory cardiac deceleration, overall heart rate was lower in somatosensory compared to visual blocks (Figure B-right). The difference in heart rate was not accompanied by differences in respiratory period. In conclusion, additional cardiac slowing in the somatosensory domain might have a functional relevance for better perceptual performance by decreasing the frequency of ‘noisy’ heartbeats and prolonging the ‘quiet’ diastole, in line with the baroreceptor hypothesis.
*Our final presentation will include 35 participants and further EEG/HEP analysis.

Top part of the Figure A depicts the sequence of each trial in the visual (first row) and somatosensory (second row) modality. The sequence includes Fixation, Warning (where the fixation cross turns red from black), then the brief stimulus presentation (a doughnut-shaped flash on the screen in the visual experiment, and an electric pulse to the left index finger in the somatosensory experiment), a post-stimulus delay and response windows for the participant to select their decision on stimulus detection (Y:yes or N:no) and confidence (C:confident, U:unconfident). The third row on Figure A depicts the categorization of R-peaks according to their timing relative to the stimulus presentation, and an illustration for where in the cardiac cycle the systole and diastole phases correspond to (roughly the first 300 ms after an R-peak for systole, and the last 300 ms before an R-peak for diastole). Left part of the Figure B depicts the comparison of hit rates for trials with stimulus presentation within systole and diastole. It shows a significant effect of cardiac phase on hit rates in the somatosensory modality (decreased hit rate in systole), but not in the visual modality. Right part of the Figure B shows that the overall heart rate is significantly lower in the somatosensory blocks with respect to the visual blocks.

Recommended posters

Cookies

We use essential cookies to run the site. Analytics cookies are optional and help us improve World Wide. Learn more.