Developmental Neuroscience seminars

Historically pregnant women and their unborn baby have been amongst those with the poorest outcomes in previous epidemics, most notably the Zika virus. For much of 2020, with the emergence of the novel coronavirus, the effect on the fetus remains unclear. While initial reports suggest that vertical transmission with SARS-CoV2 is reassuringly rare, the complex socioeconomic, domestic and broader maternal lifestyle factors which can influence a child’s lifelong well-being have been modulated during the experience of this pandemic. The developing brain is particularly susceptible to maternal stress, resulting in permanent structural changes and increased incidence of behavioural and mental health illness later in childhood. A large international longitudinal survey is being undertaken by the Department of Psychology to better understand the impact of the pandemic on those yet to be born.

I argue that the evolution of our life history, with its distinctively long, protected human childhood allows an early period of broad hypothesis search and exploration, before the demands of goal-directed exploitation set in. This cognitive profile is also found in other animals and is associated with early behaviours such as neophilia and play. I relate this developmental pattern to computational ideas about explore-exploit trade-offs, search and sampling, and to neuroscience findings. I also present several lines of new empirical evidence suggesting that young human learners are highly exploratory, both in terms of their search for external information and their search through hypothesis spaces. In fact, they are sometimes more exploratory than older learners and adults.

Corticospinal neurons (CSN) are the cortical projection neurons that innervate the spinal cord and some brainstem targets with segmental precision to control voluntary movement of specific functional motor groups, limb sections, or individual digits, yet molecular regulation over CSN segmental target specificity is essentially unknown. CSN subpopulations exhibit striking axon targeting specificity from development into maturity: Evolutionarily newer rostrolateral CSN exclusively innervate bulbar-cervical targets (CSNBC-lat), while evolutionarily older caudomedial CSN (CSNmed) are more heterogeneous, with distinct subpopulations extending axons to either bulbar-cervical or thoraco-lumbar segments. The cervical cord, with its evolutionarily enhanced precision of forelimb movement, is innervated by multiple CSN subpopulations, suggesting inter-neuronal interactions in establishing corticospinal connectivity. I identify that Lumican, previously unrecognized in axon development, controls the specificity of cervical spinal cord innervation by CSN. Remarkably, Lumican, an extracellular matrix protein expressed by CSNBC-lat, non-cell-autonomously suppresses axon collateralization in the cervical cord by CSNmed. Intersectional viral labeling and mouse genetics further identify that Lumican controls axon collateralization by multiple subpopulations in caudomedial sensorimotor cortex. These results identify inter-axonal molecular crosstalk between CSN subpopulations as a novel mechanism controlling corticospinal connectivity and competitive specificity. Further, this mechanism has potential implications for evolutionary diversification of corticospinal circuitry with finer scale precision. "" Complementing this work, to comprehensively elucidate related axon projection mechanisms functioning at tips of growing CSN axons in vivo, I am currently applying experimental and analytic approaches recently developed in my postdoc lab (Poulopoulos*, Murphy*, Nature, 2019) to quantitatively and subcellularly “map” RNA and protein molecular machinery of subtype-specific growth cones, in parallel to their parent somata, isolated directly in vivo from developing subcerebral projection neurons (SCPN; the broader cortical output neuron population targeting both brainstem and spinal cord; includes CSN). I am investigating both normal development and GC-soma dysregulation with mutation of central CSN-SCPN transcriptional regulator Ctip2/Bcl11b.

We will start our talk with a short video of our research, illustrating methods (some old and new) and findings that have provided our current understanding of how visual capabilities develop in infancy and early childhood. However, our research poses some outstanding questions. We will briefly discuss three issues, which are linked by a common focus on the development of visual attentional processing: (1) How do recurrent cortical loops contribute to development? Cortical selectivity (e.g., to orientation, motion, and binocular disparity) develops in the early months of life. However, these systems are not purely feedforward but depend on parallel pathways, with recurrent feedback loops playing a critical role. The development of diverse networks, particularly for motion processing, may explain changes in dynamic responses and resolve developmental data obtained with different methodologies. One possible role for these loops is in top-down attentional control of visual processing. (2) Why do hyperopic infants become strabismic (cross-eyes)? Binocular interaction is a particularly sensitive area of development. Standard clinical accounts suppose that long-sighted (hyperopic) refractive errors require accommodative effort, putting stress on the accommodation-convergence link that leads to its breakdown and strabismus. Our large-scale population screening studies of 9-month infants question this: hyperopic infants are at higher risk of strabismus and impaired vision (amblyopia and impaired attention) but these hyperopic infants often under- rather than over-accommodate. This poor accommodation may reflect poor early attention processing, possibly a ‘soft sign’ of subtle cerebral dysfunction. (3) What do many neurodevelopmental disorders have in common? Despite similar cognitive demands, global motion perception is much more impaired than global static form across diverse neurodevelopmental disorders including Down and Williams Syndromes, Fragile-X, Autism, children with premature birth and infants with perinatal brain injury. These deficits in motion processing are associated with deficits in other dorsal stream functions such as visuo-motor co-ordination and attentional control, a cluster we have called ‘dorsal stream vulnerability’. However, our neuroimaging measures related to motion coherence in typically developing children suggest that the critical areas for individual differences in global motion sensitivity are not early motion-processing areas such as V5/MT, but downstream parietal and frontal areas for decision processes on motion signals. Although these brain networks may also underlie attentional and visuo-motor deficits , we still do not know when and how these deficits differ across different disorders and between individual children. Answering these questions provide necessary steps, not only increasing our scientific understanding of human visual brain development, but also in designing appropriate interventions to help each child achieve their full potential.

Desde la investigación en antropología evolutiva, las neurociencias del comportamiento parental y los estudios de cohortes de orfelinatos, los nuevos conocimientos confluyen en la mayor importancia critica del periodo postnatal inmediato para el desarrollo social humano. Surge la explicación biológica de la interdependencia de los cambios comportamentales en los adultos que crían y el recién nacido: Nature of Nurture. Del concepto unidireccional clásico de la necesidad de estimular un cerebro inmaduro, se comienza a comprender la naturaleza de la interacción en red entre el cerebro neonatal y el cerebro parental que también debe ser estimulado. Concebir, engendra y criar son etapas sucesivas de la reproducción pero no indispensablemente continuas. La función parental es primariamente dependiente de la disponibilidad para cuidar al recién nacido.

The corpus callosum is the largest fibre tract in the brain of placental mammals and connects the two cerebral hemispheres. Corpus callosum dysgenesis is a developmental brain disorder that is commonly genetic and occurs in approximately 1:4000 live births. It is easily diagnosed by MRI or prenatal ultrasound and is found in isolation or together with other brain anomalies, or with other organ system defects in a large number of different congenital syndromes. Callosal dysgenesis is a structural brain wiring disorder that can impact brain function and cognition in heterogeneous ways. We aim to understand how early developmental mechanisms lead to circuit alterations that ultimately impact behaviour and cognition. Translated to Spanish by MD and Medical interpreter Trinidad Ott. El cuerpo calloso es el tracto de fibras más grande del cerebro de los mamíferos placentarios y conecta los dos hemisferios cerebrales. La disgenesia del cuerpo calloso es un trastorno del desarrollo del cerebro que comunmente es genético y ocurre en aproximadamente 1: 4000 nacidos vivos. Se diagnostica fácilmente mediante resonancia magnética o ecografía prenatal y se encuentra aislado o junto con otras anomalías cerebrales, o con otros defectos del sistema de órganos en un gran número de síndromes congénitos diferentes. La disgenesia callosa es un trastorno estructural del cableado cerebral que puede afectar la función cerebral y la cognición de formas heterogéneas. Nuestro objetivo es comprender cómo los primeros mecanismos del desarrollo conducen a alteraciones en los circuitos que, en última instancia, afectan el comportamiento y la cognición. Traducción al español por la Doctora e Intérprete Médica Trinidad Ott.

By continuously producing electrical signals, neurones are amongst the most energy-demanding cells in the organism. Resting ionic levels are restored via metabolic pumps that receive the necessary energy from oxygen supplied by blood vessels. Intense spontaneous neural activity is omnipresent in the developing CNS. It occurs during short, well-defined periods that coincide precisely with the timing of angiogenesis. Such coincidence cannot be random; there must be a universal mechanism triggering spontaneous activity concurrently with blood vessels invading neural territories for the first time. However, surprisingly little is known about the role of neural activity per se in guiding angiogenesis. Part of the reason is that it is challenging to study developing neurovascular networks in tri-dimensional space in the brain. We investigate these questions in the neonatal mouse retina, where blood vessels are much easier to visualise because they initially grow in a plane, while waves of spontaneous neural activity (spreading via cholinergic starburst amacrine cells) sweep across the retinal ganglion cell layer, in close juxtaposition with the growing vasculature. Blood vessels reach the periphery by postnatal day (P) 7-8, shortly before the cholinergic waves disappear (at P10). We discovered transient clusters of auto-fluorescent cells that form an annulus around the optic disc, gradually expanding to the periphery, which they reach at the same time as the growing blood vessels. Remarkably, these cells appear locked to the frontline of the growing vasculature. Moreover, by recording waves with a large-scale multielectrode array that enables us to visualise them at pan-retinal level, we found that their initiation points are not random; they follow a developmental centre-to-periphery pattern similar to the clusters and blood vessels. The density of growing blood vessels is higher in cluster areas than in-between clusters at matching eccentricity. The cluster cells appear to be phagocytosed by microglia. Blocking Pannexin1 (PANX1) hemichannels activity with probenecid completely blocks the spontaneous waves and results in the disappearance of the fluorescent cell clusters. We suggest that these transient cells are specialised, hyperactive neurones that form spontaneous activity hotspots, thereby triggering retinal waves through the release of ATP via PANX1 hemichannels. These activity hotspots attract new blood vessels to enhance local oxygen supply. Signalling through PANX1 attracts microglia that establish contact with these cells, eventually eliminating them once blood vessels have reached their vicinity. The auto-fluorescence that characterises the cell clusters may develop only once the process of microglial phagocytosis is initiated.

Learning by analogy is a powerful tool children’s developmental repertoire, as well as in educational contexts such as mathematics, where the key knowledge base involves building flexible schemas. However, noticing and learning from analogies develops over time and is cognitively resource intensive. I review studies that provide insight into the relationship between mechanisms driving children’s developing analogy skills, highlighting environmental inputs (parent talk and prior experiences priming attention to relations) and neuro-cognitive factors (Executive Functions and brain injury). I then note implications for mathematics learning, reviewing experimental findings that show analogy can improve learning, but also that both individual differences in EFs and environmental factors that reduce available EFs such as performance pressure can predict student learning.

In mammals, the selective transformation of transient experience into stored memory occurs in the hippocampus, which develops representations of specific events in the context in which they occur. In this talk, I will focus on the development of hippocampal circuits and the self-organized dynamics embedded in them since the latter critically support the role of the hippocampus in memory. I will discuss evidence that adult hippocampal cells and circuits are remarkably sculpted by development, as early as embryonic neurogenesis. We argue that these primary developmental programs provide a scaffold onto which later experience of the external world can be grafted. Next, I will present data on the emergence of recurrent connectivity and self-organized dynamics in hippocampal circuits and outline the critical turn points and discontinuities in that developmental journey.