axon regeneration

Mechanisms of Axon Growth and Regeneration

Almost everybody that has seen neurons under a microscope for the first time is fascinated by their beauty and their complex shape. Early on during development, however, there are hardly any signs of their future complexity, but the neurons look round and simple. How do neurons develop their sophisticated structure? How do they initially generate domains that later have distinct function within neuronal circuits, such as the axon? And, can a better understanding of the underlying developmental mechanisms help us in pathological conditions, such as a spinal cord injury, to induce axons to regenerate? Here, I will talk about the cytoskeleton as a driving force for neuronal polarization. We will then explore how cytoskeletal changes help to reactivate the growth program of injured CNS axons to elicit axon regeneration after a spinal cord injury. Finally, we will discuss whether axon growth and synapse formation may be processes in neurons that might exclude each other. Following this developmental hypothesis, it will help us to generate a novel perspective on regeneration failure in the adult CNS, and how we can overcome this failure to induce axon regeneration. Thus, this talk will describe how we can exploit developmental mechanisms to induce axon regeneration after a spinal cord injury.

Keeping axons alive after injury: Inhibiting programmed axon death

Activation of pro-degenerative protein SARM1 in response to diverse physical and disease-relevant injuries triggers programmed axon death. Original studies indicated substantially decreased levels of SARM1 were required for neuroprotection. However, we demonstrate that lowering SARM1 levels by 50% in Sarm1 haploinsufficient mice delays axon degeneration in vivo (after sciatic nerve transection), in vitro (in response to diverse traumatic, neurotoxic, and genetic triggers), and partially prevents neurite outgrowth defects in mice lacking pro-survival factor NMNAT2. We also demonstrate the capacity for Sarm1 antisense oligonucleotides to decrease SARM1 levels by more than 50% which delays or prevents programmed axon degeneration in vitro. Combining Sarm1 haploinsufficiency with antisense oligonucleotides further decreases SARM1 levels and prolongs protection after neurotoxic injuries. These data demonstrate that axon protection occurs in a Sarm1 gene-dose responsive manner and that SARM1 lowering agents have therapeutic potential. Thus, antisense oligonucleotide targeting of Sarm1 is a promising therapeutic strategy against diverse triggers of axon degeneration.

Microenvironment role in axonal regeneration- looking beyond the neurons

After an injury in the adult mammalian central nervous system, lesioned axons fail to regenerate. This failure to regenerate contrasts with the remarkable potential of axons to grow during embryonic development and after an injury in the peripheral nervous system. Peripheral sensory neurons with cell soma in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) switch to a regenerative state after nerve injury to enable axon regeneration and functional recovery. Decades of research have focused on the signaling pathways elicited by injury in sensory neurons and in Schwann cells that insulate axons as central mechanisms regulating nerve repair. However, neuronal microenvironment is far more complex and is composed of multiple cell types including endothelial, immune and glial cells. Whether the microenvironment surrounding neuronal soma contribute to the poor regenerative outcomes following central injuries remains largely unexplored. To answer this question, we performed a single cell transcriptional profiling of the DRG neuronal microenvironment response to peripheral and central injuries. In dissecting the roles of the microenvironment contribution, we have focused on a poorly studied population of Satellite Glial Cells (SGC) surrounding the neuronal cell soma. This study has uncovered a previously unknown role for SGC in nerve regeneration and defined SGC as transcriptionally distinct from Schwann cells while sharing similarities with astrocytes. Upon a peripheral injury, SGC contribute to axon regeneration via Fatty acid synthase (Fasn)-PPARα signaling pathway. Through repurposing fenofibrate, an FDA- approved PPARα agonist used for dyslipidemia treatment, we were able to rescue the impaired regeneration in mice lacking Fasn in SGC. Our analysis reveals that in response to central injuries, SGC do not activate the PPAR signaling pathway. However, induction of this pathway with fenofibrate treatment, rescued axon regeneration following an injury to the central nerves. Collectively, our results uncovered a previously unappreciated role of the neuronal microenvironment differential response in central and peripheral injuries.

Selective translation controls axon regeneration in the central nervous system

Transcriptomic analysis’ of axon regeneration-inducing manipulations discover distinct molecular programs defining a cell’s fate to die, survive or regenerate after an injury