brain cells
Latest
What shapes the transcriptional identity of a neuron?
Within the vertebrate neocortex and other telencephalic structures, molecularly-defined neurons tend to segregate at first order into GABAergic types and glutamatergic types. Two fundamental questions arise: (1) do non-telencephalic neurons similarly segregate by neurotransmitter status, and (2) do GABAergic (or glutamatergic) types sampled in different structures share many molecular features in common, beyond the few genes directly responsible for neurotransmitter synthesis and release? To address these questions, we used single-nucleus RNA sequencing, analyzing over 2.4 million brain cells sampled from 16 locations in a primate (the common marmoset). Unexpectedly, we find the answer to both is “no”. I will discuss implications for generalizing associations between neurotransmitter utilization and other phenotypes, and share ongoing efforts to map the biodistributions of cell types in the primate brain.
Epileptogenesis in the developing brain:understanding a moving target
The origins, mechanisms and consequences of epilepsy in the developing brain are incompletely understood. Many developmental epilepsies have a genetic basis and their mechanisms stem from deficits in the function of one or numerous genes. Others, such as those that follow prolonged febrile seizures or severe birth asphyxia in a ‘normal’ brain may depend on the interaction of the insult with the rapidly evolving brain cells and circuits. Yet, how early-life insults may provoke epilepsy is unclear, and requires multiple levels of analysis: behavior, circuits, cells [neurons, glia] and molecules. Here we discuss developmental epileptogenesis, addressing some of its special features: the epilepsy phenotype, the effects insults on the maturation of brain circuits, the role of neuron-glia-neuron communication in cellular and circuit refinement, and how transient epileptogenic insults provoke enduring changes in the structure, connectivity and function of salient neuronal populations. We will highlight resolved questions- and the many unresolved issues that require tackling in 2022 and beyond.
Mapping the Dynamics of the Linear and 3D Genome of Single Cells in the Developing Brain
Three intimately related dimensions of the mammalian genome—linear DNA sequence, gene transcription, and 3D genome architecture—are crucial for the development of nervous systems. Changes in the linear genome (e.g., de novo mutations), transcriptome, and 3D genome structure lead to debilitating neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and schizophrenia. However, current technologies and data are severely limited: (1) 3D genome structures of single brain cells have not been solved; (2) little is known about the dynamics of single-cell transcriptome and 3D genome after birth; (3) true de novo mutations are extremely difficult to distinguish from false positives (DNA damage and/or amplification errors). Here, I filled in this longstanding technological and knowledge gap. I recently developed a high-resolution method—diploid chromatin conformation capture (Dip-C)—which resolved the first 3D structure of the human genome, tackling a longstanding problem dating back to the 1880s. Using Dip-C, I obtained the first 3D genome structure of a single brain cell, and created the first transcriptome and 3D genome atlas of the mouse brain during postnatal development. I found that in adults, 3D genome “structure types” delineate all major cell types, with high correlation between chromatin A/B compartments and gene expression. During development, both transcriptome and 3D genome are extensively transformed in the first month of life. In neurons, 3D genome is rewired across scales, correlated with gene expression modules, and independent of sensory experience. Finally, I examined allele-specific structure of imprinted genes, revealing local and chromosome-wide differences. More recently, I expanded my 3D genome atlas to the human and mouse cerebellum—the most consistently affected brain region in autism. I uncovered unique 3D genome rewiring throughout life, providing a structural basis for the cerebellum’s unique mode of development and aging. In addition, to accurately measure de novo mutations in a single cell, I developed a new method—multiplex end-tagging amplification of complementary strands (META-CS), which eliminates nearly all false positives by virtue of DNA complementarity. Using META-CS, I determined the true mutation spectrum of single human brain cells, free from chemical artifacts. Together, my findings uncovered an unknown dimension of neurodevelopment, and open up opportunities for new treatments for autism and other developmental disorders.
Understanding the cellular and molecular landscape of autism spectrum disorders
Large genomic studies of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have revealed approximately 100-200 high risk genes. However, whether these genes function in similar or different signaling networks in brain cells (neurons) remains poorly studied. We are using proteomic technology to build an ASD-associated signaling network map as a resource for the Autism research community. This resource can be used to study Autism risk genes and understand how pathways are convergent, and how patient mutations change the interaction profile. In this presentation, we will present how we developed a pipeline using neurons to build protein-protein interaction profiles. We detected previously unknown interactions between different ASD risk genes that have never been linked together before, and for some genes, we identified new signaling pathways that have not been previously reported. This resource will be available to the research community and will foster collaborations between ASD researchers to help accelerate therapeutics for ASD and related disorders.
CRISPR-based functional genomics in iPSC-based models of brain disease
Human genes associated with brain-related diseases are being discovered at an accelerating pace. A major challenge is an identification of the mechanisms through which these genes act, and of potential therapeutic strategies. To elucidate such mechanisms in human cells, we established a CRISPR-based platform for genetic screening in human iPSC-derived neurons, astrocytes and microglia. Our approach relies on CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) and CRISPR activation (CRISPRa), in which a catalytically dead version of the bacterial Cas9 protein recruits transcriptional repressors or activators, respectively, to endogenous genes to control their expression, as directed by a small guide RNA (sgRNA). Complex libraries of sgRNAs enable us to conduct genome-wide or focused loss-of-function and gain-of-function screens. Such screens uncover molecular players for phenotypes based on survival, stress resistance, fluorescent phenotypes, high-content imaging and single-cell RNA-Seq. To uncover disease mechanisms and therapeutic targets, we are conducting genetic modifier screens for disease-relevant cellular phenotypes in patient-derived neurons and glia with familial mutations and isogenic controls. In a genome-wide screen, we have uncovered genes that modulate the formation of disease-associated aggregates of tau in neurons with a tauopathy-linked mutation (MAPT V337M). CRISPRi/a can also be used to model and functionally evaluate disease-associated changes in gene expression, such as those caused by eQTLs, haploinsufficiency, or disease states of brain cells. We will discuss an application to Alzheimer’s Disease-associated genes in microglia.
Virtual reality empowered deep learning analysis of brain cells
FENS Forum 2024
brain cells coverage
6 items