complex dynamics
Latest
Investigating the nonlinear complex dynamics of the tuft cell-microbiome cross-talk: the impact of feedback loops on immune regulation, microbial modulation and response to tissue insults
Project Abstract Tuft cells (TCs) are specialized chemosensory epithelial cells that are emerging as critical regulators of intestinal homeostasis. Named over 70 years ago based on their distinct morphology, a defined function for TCs was only elucidated in the last decade. TCs in the small intestine sense succinate from helminths to initiate type 2 immune responses that mediate parasite expulsion. Recently, we discovered a novel physiologic function for TCs in the colon, where their role had been considered minimal. Succinate, a key microbial metabolite, is produced by colonic microbiota as both a precursor to other metabolites and a cross-feeding fuel source for pathogens. TCs respond to succinate by secreting interleukin-25 (IL-25), which activates type 2 cytokine- producing lymphocytes (T2Ls), amplifying TC expansion and reinforcing barrier function. We recently demonstrated that this SPB–TC–IL-25–T2L feedback loop is essential for protection against pathogen-induced colitis. Our preliminary data further suggest that TCs actively promote colonization by succinate-producing bacteria (SPBs), establishing positive feedback on TC-supporting microbes, while other epithelial cells such as goblet cells (GCs) and Paneth cells (PCs) may exert complementary or counterbalancing influences. Supported by new modeling insights, we hypothesize that these epithelial–immune–microbiome interactions form coordinated feedback loops that collectively optimize intestinal resilience. These loops may create a dynamic, multi-stable system that flexibly transitions between homeostatic and hyperplastic states, buffering against microbial fluctuations and pathogenic insults while preventing uncontrolled type 2 inflammation. Using a combination of mathematical modeling and experimental validation, we will develop a multi- layered systems framework to explore how epithelial–immune–microbial feedbacks shape resilience or breakdown in clinically relevant models of colonic infection and inflammation. Our three Aims will (1) develop, calibrate, and validate a mathematical model that integrates TCs, GCs, PCs, SPBs, and SCBs; (2) define the immunological circuits governing epithelial–microbiome equilibrium; and (3) determine how epithelial feedbacks regulate microbial community structure and resilience. In line with NIH’s new initiative to prioritize human-based research, our proposal combines computational modeling, human colonic organoids, and complementary mouse models. Organoid experiments will provide human-relevant data for model calibration, while in vivo studies validate systemic predictions, ensuring both rigor and translational relevance while minimizing reliance on animal models. This work will generate interoperable models that integrate epithelial, microbial, and immune networks, providing predictive insight into intestinal outcomes under homeostatic, infectious, and inflammatory conditions and informing therapeutic strategies for microbiome-targeted interventions.
NMC4 Short Talk: A theory for the population rate of adapting neurons disambiguates mean vs. variance-driven dynamics and explains log-normal response statistics
Recently, the field of computational neuroscience has seen an explosion of the use of trained recurrent network models (RNNs) to model patterns of neural activity. These RNN models are typically characterized by tuned recurrent interactions between rate 'units' whose dynamics are governed by smooth, continuous differential equations. However, the response of biological single neurons is better described by all-or-none events - spikes - that are triggered in response to the processing of their synaptic input by the complex dynamics of their membrane. One line of research has attempted to resolve this discrepancy by linking the average firing probability of a population of simplified spiking neuron models to rate dynamics similar to those used for RNN units. However, challenges remain to account for complex temporal dependencies in the biological single neuron response and for the heterogeneity of synaptic input across the population. Here, we make progress by showing how to derive dynamic rate equations for a population of spiking neurons with multi-timescale adaptation properties - as this was shown to accurately model the response of biological neurons - while they receive independent time-varying inputs, leading to plausible asynchronous activity in the network. The resulting rate equations yield an insightful segregation of the population's response into dynamics that are driven by the mean signal received by the neural population, and dynamics driven by the variance of the input across neurons, with respective timescales that are in agreement with slice experiments. Further, these equations explain how input variability can shape log-normal instantaneous rate distributions across neurons, as observed in vivo. Our results help interpret properties of the neural population response and open the way to investigating whether the more biologically plausible and dynamically complex rate model we derive could provide useful inductive biases if used in an RNN to solve specific tasks.
NMC4 Keynote: Latent variable modeling of neural population dynamics - where do we go from here?
Large-scale recordings of neural activity are providing new opportunities to study network-level dynamics with unprecedented detail. However, the sheer volume of data and its dynamical complexity are major barriers to uncovering and interpreting these dynamics. I will present machine learning frameworks that enable inference of dynamics from neuronal population spiking activity on single trials and millisecond timescales, from diverse brain areas, and without regard to behavior. I will then demonstrate extensions that allow recovery of dynamics from two-photon calcium imaging data with surprising precision. Finally, I will discuss our efforts to facilitate comparisons within our field by curating datasets and standardizing model evaluation, including a currently active modeling challenge, the 2021 Neural Latents Benchmark [neurallatents.github.io].
Cognition is Rhythm
Working memory is the sketchpad of consciousness, the fundamental mechanism the brain uses to gain volitional control over its thoughts and actions. For the past 50 years, working memory has been thought to rely on cortical neurons that fire continuous impulses that keep thoughts “online”. However, new work from our lab has revealed more complex dynamics. The impulses fire sparsely and interact with brain rhythms of different frequencies. Higher frequency gamma (>35 Hz) rhythms help carry the contents of working memory while lower frequency alpha/beta (~8-30 Hz) rhythms act as control signals that gate access to and clear out working memory. In other words, a rhythmic dance between brain rhythms may underlie your ability to control your own thoughts.
How single neuron dynamics influence network activity and behaviour
To understand how the brain can perform complex tasks such as perception, we have to understand how information enters the brain, how it is transformed and how it is transferred. But, how do we measure information transfer in the brain? This presentation will start with a general introduction of what mutual information is and how to measure it in an experimental setup. Next, the talk will focus on how this can be used to develop brain models at different (spatial) levels, from the microscopic single neuron level to the macroscopic network and behavioural level. How can we incorporate the knowledge about single neurons, that already show complex dynamics, into network activity and link this to behaviour?
Working Memory 2.0
Working memory is the sketchpad of consciousness, the fundamental mechanism the brain uses to gain volitional control over its thoughts and actions. For the past 50 years, working memory has been thought to rely on cortical neurons that fire continuous impulses that keep thoughts “online”. However, new work from our lab has revealed more complex dynamics. The impulses fire sparsely and interact with brain rhythms of different frequencies. Higher frequency gamma (> 35 Hz) rhythms help carry the contents of working memory while lower frequency alpha/beta (~8-30 Hz) rhythms act as control signals that gate access to and clear out working memory. In other words, a rhythmic dance between brain rhythms may underlie your ability to control your own thoughts.
complex dynamics coverage
6 items
Add content
Have a seminar, talk, or paper on complex dynamics? Post it so others working in this area can find it.
Post content