An object’s colour, brightness and pattern are all influenced by its surroundings, and a number of visual phenomena and “illusions” have been discovered that highlight these often dramatic effects. Explanations for these phenomena range from low-level neural mechanisms to high-level processes that incorporate contextual information or prior knowledge. Importantly, few of these phenomena can currently be accounted for when measuring an object’s perceived colour. Here we ask to what extent colour appearance is predicted by a model based on the principle of coding efficiency. The model assumes that the image is encoded by noisy spatio-chromatic filters at one octave separations, which are either circularly symmetrical or oriented. Each spatial band’s lower threshold is set by the contrast sensitivity function, and the dynamic range of the band is a fixed multiple of this threshold, above which the response saturates. Filter outputs are then reweighted to give equal power in each channel for natural images. We demonstrate that the model fits human behavioural performance in psychophysics experiments, and also primate retinal ganglion responses. Next we systematically test the model’s ability to qualitatively predict over 35 brightness and colour phenomena, with almost complete success. This implies that contrary to high-level processing explanations, much of colour appearance is potentially attributable to simple mechanisms evolved for efficient coding of natural images, and is a basis for modelling the vision of humans and other animals.

Neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) encode the orientation and contrast of visual stimuli through changes in firing rate (Hubel and Wiesel, 1962). Their activity typically peaks at a preferred orientation and decays to zero at the orientations that are orthogonal to the preferred. This activity pattern is re-scaled by contrast but its shape is preserved, a phenomenon known as contrast invariance. Contrast-invariant selectivity is also observed at the population level in V1 (Carandini and Sengpiel, 2004). The mechanisms supporting the emergence of contrast-invariance at the population level remain unclear. How does the activity of different neurons with diverse orientation selectivity and non-linear contrast sensitivity combine to give rise to contrast-invariant population selectivity? Theoretical studies have shown that in the balance limit, the properties of single-neurons do not determine the population activity (van Vreeswijk and Sompolinsky, 1996). Instead, the synaptic dynamics (Mongillo et al., 2012) as well as the intracortical connectivity (Rosenbaum and Doiron, 2014) shape the population activity in balanced networks. We report that short-term plasticity can change the synaptic strength between neurons as a function of the presynaptic activity, which in turns modifies the population response to a stimulus. Thus, the same circuit can process a stimulus in different ways –linearly, sublinearly, supralinearly – depending on the properties of the synapses. We found that balanced networks with excitatory to excitatory short-term synaptic plasticity cannot be contrast-invariant. Instead, short-term plasticity modifies the network selectivity such that the tuning curves are narrower (broader) for increasing contrast if synapses are facilitating (depressing). Based on these results, we wondered whether balanced networks with plastic synapses (other than short-term) can support the emergence of contrast-invariant selectivity. Mathematically, we found that the only synaptic transformation that supports perfect contrast invariance in balanced networks is a power-law release of neurotransmitter as a function of the presynaptic firing rate (in the excitatory to excitatory and in the excitatory to inhibitory neurons). We validate this finding using spiking network simulations, where we report contrast-invariant tuning curves when synapses release the neurotransmitter following a power- law function of the presynaptic firing rate. In summary, we show that synaptic plasticity controls the type of non-linear network response to stimulus contrast and that it can be a potential mechanism mediating the emergence of contrast invariance in balanced networks with orientation-dependent connectivity. Our results therefore connect the physiology of individual synapses to the network level and may help understand the establishment of contrast-invariant selectivity.

Many visual systems can process information in dynamically changing environments. In general, visual perception scales with changes in the visual stimulus, or contrast, irrespective of background illumination. This is achieved by adaptation. However, visual perception is challenged when adaptation is not fast enough to deal with sudden changes in overall illumination, for example when gaze follows a moving object from bright sunlight into a shaded area. We have recently shown that the visual system of the fly found a solution by propagating a corrective luminance-sensitive signal to higher processing stages. Using in vivo two-photon imaging and behavioural analyses we showed that distinct OFF-pathway inputs encode contrast and luminance. The luminance-sensitive pathway is particularly required when processing visual motion in contextual dim light, when pure contrast sensitivity underestimates the salience of a stimulus. Recent work in the lab has addressed the question how two visual pathways obtain such fundamentally different sensitivities, given common photoreceptor input. We are furthermore currently working out the network-based strategies by which luminance- and contrast-sensitive signals are combined to guide appropriate visual behaviour. Together, I will discuss the molecular, cellular, and circuit mechanisms that ensure contrast computation, and therefore robust vision, in fast changing visual scenes.