For causal estimation in brain pathological conditions, models offer crucial insights into neurophysiological mechanisms. Model-based inference involves constructing a statistical or mechanistic model that captures the essential features of the data-generating process. In this context, simulation-based inference (SBI) using deep neural networks provides an invertible map between parameters and data features. Therefore, there is a need to automatically extract the low-dimensional informative data features, to train the neural networks, the so-called Normalizing-Flows. In this project, our goal is to utilize machine learning algorithms to provide input into the SBI pipeline. The data for this project will be, simulated data from models at different scales and corresponding electrophysiological data such as patch-clamp and intracranial stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) recordings. The objective is to classify seizure onset and bifurcation patterns from the complex biophysical models. The trainee will benefit from the support of the various skills available within our teams.

Predictive processing offers a unifying view of neural computation, proposing that brains continuously anticipate sensory input and update internal models based on prediction errors. In this talk, I will present converging evidence for the computational mechanisms underlying this framework across human neuroscience and deep neural networks. I will begin with recent work showing that large-scale distributed prediction-error encoding in the human brain directly predicts how sensory representations reorganize through predictive learning. I will then turn to PredNet, a popular predictive coding inspired deep network that has been widely used to model real-world biological vision systems. Using dynamic stimuli generated with our Spatiotemporal Style Transfer algorithm, we demonstrate that PredNet relies primarily on low-level spatiotemporal structure and remains insensitive to high-level content, revealing limits in its generalization capacity. Finally, I will discuss new recurrent vision models that integrate top-down feedback connections with intrinsic neural variability, uncovering a dual mechanism for robust sensory coding in which neural variability decorrelates unit responses, while top-down feedback stabilizes network dynamics. Together, these results outline how prediction error signaling and top-down feedback pathways shape adaptive sensory processing in biological and artificial systems.

Deep learning provides new data-driven tools to relate neural activity to perception and cognition, aiding scientists in developing theories of neural computation that increasingly resemble biological systems both at the level of behavior and of neural activity. But what in a deep neural network should correspond to what in a biological system? This question is addressed implicitly in the use of comparison measures that relate specific neural or behavioral dimensions via a particular functional form. However, distinct comparison methodologies can give conflicting results in recovering even a known ground-truth model in an idealized setting, leaving open the question of what to conclude from the outcome of a systems comparison using any given methodology. Here, we develop a framework to make explicit and quantitative the effect of both hypothesis-driven aspects—such as details of the architecture of a deep neural network—as well as methodological choices in a systems comparison setting. We demonstrate via the learning dynamics of deep neural networks that, while the role of the comparison methodology is often de-emphasized relative to hypothesis-driven aspects, this choice can impact and even invert the conclusions to be drawn from a comparison between neural systems. We provide evidence that the right way to adjudicate a comparison depends on the use case—the scientific hypothesis under investigation—which could range from identifying single-neuron or circuit-level correspondences to capturing generalizability to new stimulus properties

Discriminating distinct objects and concepts from sensory stimuli is essential for survival. Our brains accomplish this feat by forming meaningful internal representations in deep sensory networks with plastic synaptic connections. Experience-dependent plasticity presumably exploits temporal contingencies between sensory inputs to build these internal representations. However, the precise mechanisms underlying plasticity remain elusive. We derive a local synaptic plasticity model inspired by self-supervised machine learning techniques that shares a deep conceptual connection to Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro (BCM) theory and is consistent with experimentally observed plasticity rules. We show that our plasticity model yields disentangled object representations in deep neural networks without the need for supervision and implausible negative examples. In response to altered visual experience, our model qualitatively captures neuronal selectivity changes observed in the monkey inferotemporal cortex in-vivo. Our work suggests a plausible learning rule to drive learning in sensory networks while making concrete testable predictions.

A wide variety of animals and some artificial agents can adapt their behavior to changing cues, contexts, and goals. But what neural network architectures support such behavioral flexibility? Agents with loosely structured network architectures and random connections can be trained over millions of trials to display flexibility in specific tasks, but many animals must adapt and learn with much less experience just to survive. Further, it has been challenging to understand how the structure of trained deep neural networks relates to their functional properties, an important objective for neuroscience. In my talk, I will use a combination of behavioral, physiological and connectomic evidence from the fly to make the case that the built-in modularity and structure of its networks incorporate key aspects of the animal’s ecological niche, enabling rapid flexibility by constraining learning to operate on a restricted parameter set. It is not unlikely that this is also a feature of many biological neural networks across other animals, large and small, and with and without vertebrae.

Deep neural networks (DNNs) with the flexibility to learn good top-layer representations have eclipsed shallow kernel methods without that flexibility. Here, we take inspiration from deep neural networks to develop a new family of deep kernel method. In a deep kernel method, there is a kernel at every layer, and the kernels are jointly optimized to improve performance (with strong regularisation). We establish the representational power of deep kernel methods, by showing that they perform exact inference in an infinitely wide Bayesian neural network or deep Gaussian process. Next, we conjecture that the deep kernel machine objective is unimodal, and give a proof of unimodality for linear kernels. Finally, we exploit the simplicity of the deep kernel machine loss to develop a new family of optimizers, based on a matrix equation from control theory, that converges in around 10 steps.

Deep learning has made tremendous progress in the last year but it's high computational and memory requirements impose challenges in using deep learning on edge devices. There has been some progress in lowering memory requirements of deep neural networks (for instance, use of half-precision) but there has been minimal effort in developing alternative efficient computational paradigms. Inspired by the brain, Spiking Neural Networks (SNN) provide an energy-efficient alternative to conventional rate-based neural networks. However, SNN architectures that employ the traditional feedforward and feedback pass do not fully exploit the asynchronous event-based processing paradigm of SNNs. In the first part of my talk, I will present my work on predictive coding which offers a fundamentally different approach to developing neural networks that are particularly suitable for event-based processing. In the second part of my talk, I will present our work on development of approaches for SNNs that target specific problems like low response latency and continual learning. References Dora, S., Bohte, S. M., & Pennartz, C. (2021). Deep Gated Hebbian Predictive Coding Accounts for Emergence of Complex Neural Response Properties Along the Visual Cortical Hierarchy. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 65. Saranirad, V., McGinnity, T. M., Dora, S., & Coyle, D. (2021, July). DoB-SNN: A New Neuron Assembly-Inspired Spiking Neural Network for Pattern Classification. In 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. Machingal, P., Thousif, M., Dora, S., Sundaram, S., Meng, Q. (2021). A Cross Entropy Loss for Spiking Neural Networks. Expert Systems with Applications (under review).

The last few years have seen some dramatic developments in artificial intelligence research. What implications might these have for neuroscience? Investigations of this question have, to date, focused largely on deep neural networks trained using supervised learning, in tasks such as image classification. However, there is another area of recent AI work which has so far received less attention from neuroscientists, but which may have more profound neuroscientific implications: Deep reinforcement learning. Deep RL offers a rich framework for studying the interplay among learning, representation and decision-making, offering to the brain sciences a new set of research tools and a wide range of novel hypotheses. I’ll provide a high level introduction to deep RL, discuss some recent neuroscience-oriented investigations from my group at DeepMind, and survey some wider implications for research on brain and behavior.

Model-based approaches to control and decision making have long held the promise of being more powerful and data efficient than model-free counterparts. However, success with model-based methods has been limited to those cases where a perfect model can be queried. The game of Go was mastered by AlphaGo using a combination of neural networks and the MCTS planning algorithm. But planning required a perfect representation of the game rules. I will describe new algorithms that instead leverage deep neural networks to learn models of the environment which are then used to plan, and update policy and value functions. These new algorithms offer hints about how brains might approach planning and acting in complex environments.