Many psychoactive substances are used with the aim of altering experience, e.g. as analgesics, antidepressants or antipsychotics. These drugs act on specific receptor systems in the brain, including the opioid, serotonergic and dopaminergic systems. In this talk, I will summarise human drug studies targeting opioid receptors and their role for human experience, with focus on the experience of pain, stress, mood, and social connection. Opioids are only indicated for analgesia, due to their potential to cause addiction. When these regulations occurred, other known effects were relegated to side effects. This may be the cause of the prevalent myth that opioids are the most potent painkillers, despite evidence from head-to-head trials, Cochrane reviews and network meta-analyses that opioids are not superior to non-opioid analgesics in the treatment of acute or chronic non-cancer pain. However, due to the variability and diversity of opioid effects across contexts and experiences, some people under some circumstances may indeed benefit from prolonged treatment. I will present data on individual differences in opioid effects due to participant sex and stress induction. Understanding the effects of these commonly used medications on other aspects of the human experience is important to ensure correct use and to prevent unnecessary pain and addiction risk.

The use of molecular imaging, particularly PET and SPECT, has significantly transformed the treatment of schizophrenia with antipsychotic drugs since the late 1980s. It has offered insights into the links between drug target engagement, clinical effects, and side effects. A therapeutic window for receptor occupancy is established for antipsychotics, yet there is a divergence of opinions regarding the importance of blood levels, with many downplaying their significance. As a result, the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as a personalized therapy tool is often underrated. Since molecular imaging of antipsychotics has focused almost entirely on D2-like dopamine receptors and their potential to control positive symptoms, negative symptoms and cognitive deficits are hardly or not at all investigated. Alternative methods have been introduced, i.e. to investigate the correlation between approximated receptor occupancies from blood levels and cognitive measures. Within the domain of antidepressants, and specifically regarding ketamine's efficacy in depression treatment, there is limited comprehension of the association between plasma concentrations and target engagement. The measurement of AMPA receptors in the human brain has added a new level of comprehension regarding ketamine's antidepressant effects. To ensure precise prescription of psychotropic drugs, it is vital to have a nuanced understanding of how molecular and clinical effects interact. Clinician scientists are assigned with the task of integrating these indispensable pharmacological insights into practice, thereby ensuring a rational and effective approach to the treatment of mental health disorders, signaling a new era of personalized drug therapy mechanisms that promote neuronal plasticity not only under pathological conditions, but also in the healthy aging brain.

Programmed axon death is a widespread and completely preventable mechanism in injury and disease. Mouse and Drosophila studies define a molecular pathway involving activation of SARM1 NA Dase and its prevention by NAD synthesising enzyme NMNAT2 . Loss of axonal NMNAT2 causes its substrate, NMN , to accumulate and activate SARM1 , driving loss of NAD and changes in ATP , ROS and calcium. Animal models caused by genetic mutation, toxins, viruses or metabolic defects can be alleviated by blocking programmed axon death, for example models of CMT1B , chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), rabies and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). The perinatal lethality of NMNAT2 null mice is completely rescued, restoring a normal, healthy lifespan. Animal models lack the genetic and environmental diversity present in human populations and this is problematic for modelling gene-environment combinations, for example in CIPN and DPN , and identifying rare, pathogenic mutations. Instead, by testing human gene variants in WGS datasets for loss- and gain-of-function, we identified enrichment of rare SARM1 gain-of-function variants in sporadic ALS , despite previous negative findings in SOD1 transgenic mice. We have shown in mice that heterozygous SARM1 loss-of-function is protective from a range of axonal stresses and that naturally-occurring SARM1 loss-of-function alleles are present in human populations. This enables new approaches to identify disorders where blocking SARM1 may be therapeutically useful, and the existence of two dominant negative human variants in healthy adults is some of the best evidence available that drugs blocking SARM1 are likely to be safe. Further loss- and gain-of-function variants in SARM1 and NMNAT2 are being identified and used to extend and strengthen the evidence of association with neurological disorders. We aim to identify diseases, and specific patients, in whom SARM1 -blocking drugs are most likely to be effective.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple disease-associated genetic variations across different psychiatric disorders raising the question of how these genetic variants relate to the corresponding pharmacological treatments. In this talk, I will outline our work investigating whether functional information from a range of open bioinformatics datasets such as protein interaction network (PPI), brain eQTL, and gene expression pattern across the brain can uncover the relationship between GWAS-identified genetic variation and the genes targeted by current drugs for psychiatric disorders. Focusing on four psychiatric disorders---ADHD, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder---we assess relationships between the gene targets of drug treatments and GWAS hits and show that while incorporating information derived from functional bioinformatics data, such as the PPI network and spatial gene expression, can reveal links for bipolar disorder, the overall correspondence between treatment targets and GWAS-implicated genes in psychiatric disorders rarely exceeds null expectations. This relatively low degree of correspondence across modalities suggests that the genetic mechanisms driving the risk for psychiatric disorders may be distinct from the pathophysiological mechanisms used for targeting symptom manifestations through pharmacological treatments and that novel approaches for understanding and treating psychiatric disorders may be required.

Development of new medications for mental health conditions is a pressing need given the high proportion of people not responding to available treatments. We hope that presenting ebselen to a wider audience will inspire further studies on this promising agent with a benign side-effects profile. Laboratory research, animal research and human studies suggest that ebselen shares many features with the mood stabilising drug lithium, creating a promise of a drug that would have a similar clinical effect but without lithium’s troublesome side-effect profile and toxicity. Both drugs have a common biological target, inositol monophosphatase, whose inhibition is thought key to lithium’s therapeutic effect. Both drugs have neuroprotective action and reduce oxidative stress. In animal studies, ebselen affected neurotransmitters involved in the development of mental health symptoms, and in particular, produced effects of serotonin function very similar to lithium. Both ebselen and lithium share behavioural effects: antidepressant-like effects in rodent models of depression and decrease in behavioural impulsivity, a property associated with lithium's anti-suicidal action. Human neuropsychological studies support an antidepressant profile for ebselen based on its positive impact on emotional processing and reward seeking. Our group currently is exploring ebselen’s effects in patients with mood disorders. A completed ‘add-on’ clinical trial in mania showed ebselen’s superiority over placebo after three weeks of treatment. Our ongoing experimental research explores ebselen’s antidepressant profile in patients with treatment resistant depression. If successful, this will lead to a clinical trial of ebselen as an antidepressant augmentation agent, similar to lithium.

The David Smith Lectures in Anatomical Neuropharmacology, Part of the 'Pharmacology, Anatomical Neuropharmacology and Drug Discovery Seminars Series', Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford. The 15th David Smith Award Lecture in Anatomical Neuropharmacology will be delivered by Professor Tim Bliss, Visiting Professor at UCL and the Frontier Institutes of Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China, and is hosted by Professor Nigel Emptage. This award lecture was set up to celebrate the vision of Professor A David Smith, namely, that explanations of the action of drugs on the brain requires the definition of neuronal circuits, the location and interactions of molecules. Tim Bliss gained his PhD at McGill University in Canada. He joined the MRC National Institute for Medical Research in Mill Hill, London in 1967, where he remained throughout his career. His work with Terje Lømo in the late 1960’s established the phenomenon of long-term potentiation (LTP) as the dominant synaptic model of how the mammalian brain stores memories. He was elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1994 and is a founding fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences. He shared the Bristol Myers Squibb award for Neuroscience with Eric Kandel in 1991, the Ipsen Prize for Neural Plasticity with Richard Morris and Yadin Dudai in 2013. In May 2012 he gave the annual Croonian Lecture at the Royal Society on ‘The Mechanics of Memory’. In 2016 Tim, with Graham Collingridge and Richard Morris shared the Brain Prize, one of the world's most coveted science prizes. Abstract: In 1966 there appeared in Acta Physiologica Scandinavica an abstract of a talk given by Terje Lømo, a PhD student in Per Andersen’s laboratory at the University of Oslo. In it Lømo described the long-lasting potentiation of synaptic responses in the dentate gyrus of the anaesthetised rabbit that followed repeated episodes of 10-20Hz stimulation of the perforant path. Thus, heralded and almost entirely unnoticed, one of the most consequential discoveries of 20th century neuroscience was ushered into the world. Two years later I arrived in Oslo as a visiting post-doc from the National Institute for Medical Research in Mill Hill, London. In this talk I recall the events that led us to embark on a systematic reinvestigation of the phenomenon now known as long-term potentiation (LTP) and will then go on to describe the discoveries and controversies that enlivened the early decades of research into synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. I will end with an observer’s view of the current state of research in the field, and what we might expect from it in the future.

Inter-individual variability refers to differences in the expression of behaviors between members of a population. For instance, some individuals take greater risks, are more attracted to immediate gains or are more susceptible to drugs of abuse than others. To probe the neural bases of inter-individual variability  we study reward seeking and decision-making in mice, and dissect the specific role of dopamine in the modulation of these behaviors. Using a spatial version of the multi-armed bandit task, in which mice are faced with consecutive binary choices, we could link modifications of midbrain dopamine cell dynamics with modulation of exploratory behaviors, a major component of individual characteristics in mice. By analyzing mouse behaviors in semi-naturalistic environments, we then explored the role of social relationships in the shaping of dopamine activity and associated beahviors. I will present recent data from the laboratory suggesting that changes in the activity of dopaminergic networks link social influences with variations in the expression of non-social behaviors: by acting on the dopamine system, the social context may indeed affect the capacity of individuals to make decisions, as well as their vulnerability to drugs of abuse, in particular nicotine.

Dr. David E. Olson will give a talk addressed to the Humanitas University Undergraduate Neurological Society students, focusing on his work on psychedelic drugs and related plasticity-promoting neurotherapeutics. The event will begin with a general and brief introduction to the topic by the HUUNS members.

Expression of Gi-coupled designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) on excitatory hippocampal neurons in the hippocampus represents a potential new therapeutic strategy for drug-resistant epilepsy. During my talk I will demonstrate that we obtained potent suppression of spontaneous epileptic seizures in mouse and a rat models for temporal lobe epilepsy using different DREADD ligands, up to one year after viral vector expression. The chemogenetic approach clearly outperforms the seizure-suppressing efficacy of currently existing anti-epileptic drugs. Besides the promises, I will also present some of the challenges associated with a potential chemogenetic therapy, including constitutive DREADD activity, tolerance effects, risk for toxicity, paradoxical excitatory effects in non-epileptic hippocampal tissue.

How psychedelic drugs change the activity of cortical neuronal populations is not well understood. It is also not clear which changes are specific to transition into the psychedelic brain state and which are shared with other brain state transitions. Here, we used Neuropixels probes to record from large populations of neurons in prefrontal cortex of mice given the psychedelic drug TCB-2. The primary effect of drug ingestion was stretching of the distribution of log firing rates of the recorded population. This phenomenon was previously observed across transitions between sleep and wakefulness, which prompted us to examine how common it is. We found that modulation of the width of the log-rate distribution of a neuronal population occurred in multiple areas of the cortex and in the hippocampus even in awake drug-free mice, driven by intrinsic fluctuations in their arousal level. Arousal, however, did not explain the stretching of the log-rate distribution by TCB-2. In both psychedelic and intrinsically occurring brain state transitions, the stretching or squeezing of the log-rate distribution of an entire neuronal population were the result of a more close overlap between log-rate distributions of the upregulated and downregulated subpopulations in one brain state compared to the other brain state. Often, we also observed that the log-rate distribution of the downregulated subpopulation was stretched, whereas the log-rate distribution of the upregulated subpopulation was squeezed. In both subpopulations, the stretching and squeezing were a signature of a greater relative impact of the brain state transition on the rates of the slow-firing neurons. These findings reveal a generic pattern of reorganisation of neuronal firing rates by different kinds of brain state transitions.

How the brain creates a painful experience remains a mystery. Solving this mystery is crucial to understanding the fundamental biological processes that underlie the perception of body integrity, and to creating better, non-addictive pain treatments. My laboratory’s goal is to resolve the neural basis of pain. We aim to understand the mechanisms by which our nervous system produces and assembles the sensory-discriminative, affective-motivational, and cognitive-evaluative dimensions of pain to create this unique and critically important experience. To capture every component of the pain experience, we examine the entirety of the pain circuitry, from sensory and spinal ascending pathways to cortical/subcortical circuits and brainstem descending pain modulation systems, at the molecular, cellular, circuit and whole-animal levels. For these studies, we have invented novel behavioral paradigms to interrogate the affective and cognitive dimensions of pain in mice while simultaneously imaging and manipulating nociceptive circuits. My laboratory also investigates how opioids suppress pain. Remarkably, despite their medical and societal significance, how opium poppy alkaloids such as morphine produce profound analgesia remains largely unexplained. By identifying where and how opioids act in neural circuits, we not only establish the mechanisms of action of one of the oldest drugs known to humans, but also reveal the critical elements of the pain circuitry for developing of novel analgesics and bringing an end to the opioid epidemic.

Pathogenic variants in HCN1 are associated with severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE). We have engineered the Hcn1 M294L heterozygous knock-in (Hcn1M294L) mouse which is a homolog of the de novo HCN1 M305L recurrent pathogenic variant. The mouse recapitulates the phenotypic features of patients including having spontaneous seizures and a learning deficit. In this talk I will present experimental work that probes the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying hyper-excitability in the mouse model. This will include testing the efficacy of currently available antiepileptic drugs and a novel precision medicine approach. I will also briefly touch on how disease biology can give insights into the biophysical properties of HCN channels.

Large scale genetic studies and associated functional investigations have tremendously augmented our knowledge about the mechanisms underlying epileptic seizures, and sometimes also accompanying developmental problems. Pharmacotherapy of the epilepsies is routinely guided by trial and error, since predictors for a response to specific antiepileptic drugs are largely missing. The recent advances in the field of genetic epilepsies now offer an increasing amount of either well fitting established or new re-purposing therapies for genetic epilepsy syndromes based on understanding of the pathophysiological principles. Examples are provided by variants in ion channel or transporter encoding genes which cause a broad spectrum of epilepsy syndromes of variable severity and onset, (1) the ketogenic diet for glucose transporter defects of the blood-brain barrier, (2) Na+ channel blockers (e.g. carbamazepine) for gain-of-function Na+ channel mutations and avoidance of those drugs for loss-of-function mutations, and (3) specific K+ channel blockers for mutations with a gain-of-function defect in respective K+ channels. I will focus in my talk on the latter two including the underlying mechanisms, their relation to clinical phenotypes and possible therapeutic implications. In conclusion, genetic and mechanistic studies offer promising tools to predict therapeutic effects in rare epilepsies.

During sexual behavior, copulation related sensory information and modulatory signals from the brain must be integrated and converted into the motor and secretory outputs that characterize ejaculation (Lenschow and Lima, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2020). Studies in humans and rats suggest the existence of interneurons in the lumbar spinal cord that mediates that step: the spinal ejaculation generator (SEG). My work aimed at gaining mechanistic insights about the neuronal circuits controlling ejaculation thereby applying cutting-edge techniques. More specifically, we mapped anatomically and functionally the spinal circuit for ejaculation starting from the main muscle being involved in sperm expulsion: the bulbospongiosus muscle (BSM). Combining viral tracing strategies with electrophysiology, we specifically show that the BSM motoneurons receive direct synaptic input from a group of interneurons located in between lumbar segment 2 and 3 and expressing the peptide galanin. Electrically and optogenetically activating the galanin positive cells (the SEG) lead to the activation of the motoneurons innervating the BSM and the muscle itself. Finally, inhibition of SEG cells using DREADDs (Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs) in sexual behaving animals is currently conducted to reveal whether ejaculation can be prevented.

Obesity and neurodegeneration lead to millions of premature deaths each year and lack broadly effective treatments. Obesity is largely caused by the abnormal function of cell populations in the hypothalamus that regulate appetite. We have developed methods generate human hypothalamic neurons from hPSCs to study how they respond to nutrients and hormones (e.g. leptin) and how disease-associated mutations alter their function. Since human hypothalamic neurons can be produced in large numbers, are functionally responsive, have a human genome that can be readily edited, and are in culture environment that can be readily controlled, there is an unprecedented opportunity to study the genetic and environmental factors underlying obesity. In addition, we are fascinated by the fact that mid-life obesity is a risk factor for dementia later in life, and caloric restriction, exercise, and certain anti-obesity drugs are neuroprotective, suggesting that there are shared mechanisms between obesity and neurodegeneration. Studies of HPSC-derived hypothalamic neurons may help bridge the mechanistic gulf between human genetic data and organismic phenotypes, revealing new therapeutic targets. ​

The ability to experience pain is old in evolutionary terms. It is an experience shared across species. Acute pain is the body’s alarm system, and as such it is a good thing. Pain that persists beyond normal tissue healing time (3-4 months) is defined as chronic – it is the system gone wrong and it is not a good thing. Chronic pain has recently been classified as both a symptom and disease in its own right. It is one of the largest medical health problems worldwide with one in five adults diagnosed with the condition. The brain is key to the experience of pain and pain relief. This is the place where pain emerges as a perception. So, relating specific brain measures using advanced neuroimaging to the change patients describe in their pain perception induced by peripheral or central sensitization (i.e. amplification), psychological or pharmacological mechanisms has tremendous value. Identifying where amplification or attenuation processes occur along the journey from injury to the brain (i.e. peripheral nerves, spinal cord, brainstem and brain) for an individual and relating these neural mechanisms to specific pain experiences, measures of pain relief, persistence of pain states, degree of injury and the subject's underlying genetics, has neuroscientific and potential diagnostic relevance. This is what neuroimaging has afforded – a better understanding and explanation of why someone’s pain is the way it is. We can go ‘behind the scenes’ of the subjective report to find out what key changes and mechanisms make up an individual’s particular pain experience. A key area of development has been pharmacological imaging where objective evidence of drugs reaching the target and working can be obtained. We even now understand the mechanisms of placebo analgesia – a powerful phenomenon known about for millennia. More recently, researchers have been investigating through brain imaging whether there is a pre-disposing vulnerability in brain networks towards developing chronic pain. So, advanced neuroimaging studies can powerfully aid explanation of a subject’s multidimensional pain experience, pain relief (analgesia) and even what makes them vulnerable to developing chronic pain. The application of this goes beyond the clinic and has relevance in courts of law, and other areas of society, such as in veterinary care. Relatively far less work has been directed at understanding what changes in the brain occur during altered states of consciousness induced either endogenously (e.g. sleep) or exogenously (e.g. anaesthesia). However, that situation is changing rapidly. Our recent multimodal neuroimaging work explores how anaesthetic agents produce altered states of consciousness such that perceptual experiences of pain and awareness are degraded. This is bringing us fascinating insights into the complex phenomenon of anaesthesia, consciousness and even the concept of self-hood. These topics will be discussed in my talk alongside my ‘side-story’ of life as a scientist combining academic leadership roles with doing science and raising a family.

The anterior insular cortex (AIC) has been implicated in addictive behaviour, including the loss of control over drug intake, craving and the propensity to relapse. Evidence suggests that the influence of the AIC on drug-related behaviours is complex as in rats exposed to extended access to cocaine self-administration, the AIC was shown to exert a state-dependent, bidirectional influence on the development and expression of loss of control over drug intake, facilitating the latter but impairing the former. However, it is unclear whether this influence of the AIC is confined to stimulant drugs that have marked peripheral sympathomimetic and anxiogenic effects or whether it extends to other addictive drugs, such as opiates, that lack overt acute aversive peripheral effects. We investigated in outbred rats the effects of bilateral excitotoxic lesions of AIC induced both prior to or after long-term exposure to extended access heroin self-administration, on the development and maintenance of escalated heroin intake and the subsequent vulnerability to relapse following abstinence. Compared to sham surgeries, pre-exposure AIC lesions had no effect on the development of loss of control over heroin intake, but lesions made after a history of escalated heroin intake potentiated escalation and also enhanced responding at relapse. These data show that the AIC inhibits or limits the loss of control over heroin intake and propensity to relapse, in marked contrast to its influence on the loss of control over cocaine intake.

L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia is a debilitating adverse effect of treating Parkinson’s disease with this drug. New therapeutic approaches that prevent or attenuate this side effect is clearly needed. Wistar adult male rats submitted to 6-hydroxydopamine-induced unilateral medial forebrain bundle lesions were treated with L-DOPA (oral or subcutaneous, 20 mg kg-1) once a day for 14 days. After this period, we tested if doxycycline (40 mg kg-1, intraperitoneal, a subantimicrobial dose) and COL-3 (50 and 100 nmol, intracerebroventricular) could reverse LID. In an additional experiment, doxycycline was also administered repeatedly with L-DOPA to verify if it would prevent LID development. A single injection of doxycycline or COL-3 together with L-DOPA attenuated the dyskinesia. Co-treatment with doxycycline from the first day of L-DOPA suppressed the onset of dyskinesia. The improved motor responses to L-DOPA remained intact in the presence of doxycycline or COL-3, indicating the preservation of L-DOPA-produced benefits. Doxycycline treatment was associated with decreased immunoreactivity of FosB, cyclooxygenase-2, the astroglial protein GFAP and the microglial protein OX-42 which are elevated in the basal ganglia of rats exhibiting dyskinesia. Doxycycline also decreased metalloproteinase-2/-9 activity, metalloproteinase-3 expression and reactive oxygen species production. Metalloproteinase-2/-9 activity and production of reactive oxygen species in the basal ganglia of dyskinetic rats showed a significant correlation with the intensity of dyskinesia. The present study demonstrates the anti-dyskinetic potential of doxycycline and its analog compound COL-3 in hemiparkinsonian rats. Given the long-established and safe clinical use of doxycycline, this study suggests that these drugs might be tested to reduce or to prevent L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s patients.

The factors that underlie an individual’s vulnerability to switch from controlled, recreational drug use to addiction are not well understood. I will discuss the evidence in rats that in individuals housed in enriched conditions, the experience of drugs in the relative social and sensory impoverishment of the drug taking context, and the associated change in behavioural traits of resilience to addiction, exacerbate the vulnerability to develop compulsive drug intake. I will further discuss the importance of the acquisition of alcohol drinking as a mechanism to cope with distress as a factor of exacerbated vulnerability to develop compulsive alcohol intake. Together these results demonstrate that experiential factors in the drug taking context, which can be substantially driven by social isolation, shape the vulnerability to addiction.

KCC2, best known as the neuron-specific chloride extruder that sets the strength and polarity of GABAergic Cl-currents, is a multifunctional molecule which interacts with other ion-regulatory proteins and (structurally) with the neuronal cytoskeleton. Its multiple roles in the generation and suppression of seizures have been widely studied. In my talk, I will address some fundamental issues which are relevant in this field of research: What are EGABA shifts about? What is the role of KCC2 in shunting inhibition? What is meant by “the balance between excitation and inhibition” and, in this context, by the “NKCC1/KCC2 ratio”? Is down-regulation of KCC2 following neuronal trauma a manifestation of adaptive or maladaptive ionic plasticity? Under what conditions is K-Cl cotransport by KCC2 promoting seizures? Should we pay more attention to KCC2 as molecule involved in dendritic spine formation in brain areas such as the hippocampus? Most of these points are of potential importance also in the design of KCC2-targeting drugs and genetic manipulations aimed at combating seizures.

A variety of pharmacological treatments exist for patients suffering from focal seizures, but systemically administered drugs offer only symptomatic relief and frequently cause unwanted side effects. Moreover, available drugs are ineffective in one third of the patients. Thus, developing more targeted and effective treatment strategies is highly warranted. Neurotrophic factors are candidates for treating epilepsy, but their development has been hampered by difficulties in achieving stable and targeted delivery of efficacious concentrations within the brain. We have developed an implantable cell encapsulation system that delivers high and consistent levels of neurotrophic molecules directly to a specific brain region. The potential of this approach has been tested by delivering glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) to the hippocampus of epileptic rats. In vivo studies demonstrated that these intrahippocampal implants continue to secrete GDNF and produce high hippocampal GDNF tissue levels in a long-lasting manner. Identical implants rapidly and greatly reduced seizure frequency in the pilocarpine model. This effect increased in magnitude over 3 months, ultimately leading to a reduction of spontaneous seizures by more than 90%. Importantly, these effects were accompanied by improvements in cognition and anxiety, and by the normalization of many histological alterations that are associated with chronic epilepsy. In addition, the antiseizure effect persisted even after device removal. Finally, by establishing a unilateral epileptic focus using the intrahippocampal kainate model, we found that delivery of GDNF exclusively within the focus suppressed already established spontaneous recurrent seizures. Together, these results support the concept that the implantation of encapsulated GDNF-secreting cells can deliver GDNF in a sustained, targeted, and efficacious manner. These findings may form the basis for clinical translation of this approach.

This seminar is part of our “Emergent Scientists” series, an initiative that provides a platform for scientists at the critical PhD/postdoc transition period to share their work with a broad audience and network. Summary: These talks cover Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research in both mice and humans. Christiana will discuss in particular the translational aspects of applying mouse work to humans and the importance of timing in disease pathology and intervention (e.g. timing between AD biomarkers vs. symptom onset, timing of therapy, etc.). Siddharth will discuss a rare variant of Alzheimer’s disease called “Logopenic Progressive Aphasia”, which presents with temporo-parietal atrophy yet relative sparing of hippocampal circuitry. Siddharth will discuss how, despite the unusual anatomical basis underlying this AD variant, degeneration of the angular gyrus in the left inferior parietal lobule contributes to memory deficits similar to those of typical amnesic Alzheimer’s disease. Christiana’s abstract: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a debilitating neurodegenerative disorder that causes severe deterioration of memory, cognition, behavior, and the ability to perform daily activities. The disease is characterized by the accumulation of two proteins in fibrillar form; Amyloid-β forms fibrils that accumulate as extracellular plaques while tau fibrils form intracellular tangles. Here we aim to translate findings from a commonly used AD mouse model to AD patients. Here we initiate and chronically inhibit neuropathology in lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC) layer two neurons in an AD mouse model. This is achieved by over-expressing P301L tau virally and chronically activating hM4Di DREADDs intracranially using the ligand dechloroclozapine. Biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is measured longitudinally in the model using microdialysis, and we use this same system to intracranially administer drugs aimed at halting AD-related neuropathology. The models are additionally tested in a novel contextual memory task. Preliminary findings indicate that viral injections of P301L tau into LEC layer two reveal direct projections between this region and the outer molecular layer of dentate gyrus and the rest of hippocampus. Additionally, phosphorylated tau co-localize with ‘starter cells’ and appear to spread from the injection site. Preliminary microdialysis results suggest that the concentrations of CSF amyloid-β and tau proteins mirror changes observed along the disease cascade in patients. The disease-modifying drugs appear to halt neuropathological development in this preclincial model. These findings will lead to a novel platform for translational AD research, linking the extensive research done in rodents to clinical applications. Siddharth’s abstract: A distributed brain network supports our ability to remember past events. The parietal cortex is a critical member of this network, yet, its exact contributions to episodic remembering remain unclear. Neurodegenerative syndromes affecting the posterior neocortex offer a unique opportunity to understand the importance and role of parietal regions to episodic memory. In this talk, I introduce and explore the rare neurodegenerative syndrome of Logopenic Progressive Aphasia (LPA), an aphasic variant of Alzheimer’s disease presenting with early, left-lateralized temporo-parietal atrophy, amidst relatively spared hippocampal integrity. I then discuss two key studies from my recent Ph.D. work showcasing pervasive episodic and autobiographical memory dysfunction in LPA, to a level comparable to typical, amnesic Alzheimer’s disease. Using multimodal neuroimaging, I demonstrate how degeneration of the angular gyrus in the left inferior parietal lobule, and its structural connections to the hippocampus, contribute to amnesic profiles in this syndrome. I finally evaluate these findings in the context of memory profiles in other posterior cortical neurodegenerative syndromes as well as recent theoretical models underscoring the importance of the parietal cortex in the integration and representation of episodic contextual information.

Axons degenerate before the neuronal soma in many neurodegenerative diseases. Programmed axon death (Wallerian degeneration) is a widely-occurring mechanism of axon loss that is well understood and preventable in animals. Its aberrant activation by mutation of the pro-survival gene Nmnat2 directly causes axonopathy in mice with severity ranging from mild polyneuropathy to perinatal lethality. Rare biallelic mutations in the homologous human gene cause related phenotypes in patients. NMNAT2 is a negative regulator of the prodegenerative NADase SARM1. Constitutive activation of SARM1 is cytotoxic and the human SARM1 locus is significantly associated with sporadic ALS. Another negative regulator, STMN2, has also been implicated in ALS, where it is commonly depleted downstream of TDP-43. In mice, programmed axon death can be robustly blocked by deletion of Sarm1, or by overexpression, axonal targeting and/or stabilization of various NMNAT isoforms. This alleviates models of many human disorders including some forms of peripheral neuropathy, motor neuron diseases, glaucoma, Parkinson’s disease and traumatic brain injury, and it confers lifelong rescue on the lethal Nmnat2 null phenotype and other conditions. Drug discovery programs now aim to achieve similar outcomes in human disease. In order to optimize the use of such drugs, we have characterized a range of human NMNAT2 and SARM1 functional variants that underlie a spectrum of axon vulnerability in the human population. Individuals at the vulnerable end of this spectrum are those most likely to benefit from drugs blocking programmed axon death, and disorders associated with these genotypes are promising indications in which to apply them.

A long-term treatment with antidepressants reduces the risk to develop AD and different second-generation antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are currently studied for their neuroprotective properties in AD. An impairment of neurotrophic factors signaling seems to be a common pathophysiological event in depression and AD. In particular a deficit of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and increased oxidative stress have been found both in depression and AD. In the present work the SSRI fluoxetine and the new multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine were tested for their ability to prevent memory deficits and depressive-like phenotype in a non-transgenic mouse model of AD (i.c.v. Aβ1-42 injection) by rescue of TGF-β1 signaling. The same drugs were also tested for their ability to modulate the expression of pro-oxidant genes as well as of genes related to the antioxidant machinery.

Chemotherapeutic drugs (used for treating cancer), HIV infection and antiretroviral therapy (ART) can independently cause difficult-to-manage painful neuropathy. Paclitaxel, a chemotherapeutic drug, for example is associated with high incidence of peripheral neuropathy, around 71% of the patients of which 27% of these develop neuropathic pain. Use of cannabis or phytocannabinoids has been reported to improve pain measures in patients with neuropathic pain, including painful HIV-associated sensory neuropathy and cancer pain. Phytocannabinoids and endocannabinoids, such as anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), produce their effects via cannabinoid (CB) receptors, which are present both in the periphery and central nervous system. Endocannabinoids are synthesized in an “on demand” fashion and are degraded by various enzymes such as fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL). Various studies, including those from our group, suggest that there are changes in gene and protein expression of endocannabinoid molecules during chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain (CINP), HIV and antiretroviral-induced neuropathic pain. Analysis of endocannabinoid molecule expression in the brain, spinal cord and paw skin using LC-MS/MS show that there is a specific deficiency of the endocannabinoids 2-AG and/or anandamide in the periphery during CINP. Various drugs including endocannabinoids, cannabidiol, inhibitors of FAAH and MGL, CB receptor agonists, desipramine and coadministered indomethacin plus minocycline have been found to either prevent the development and/or attenuate established CINP, HIV and antiretroviral-induced neuropathic pain in a CB receptor-dependent manner. The results available suggest that targeting the endocannabinoid system for prevention and treatment of CINP, HIV-associated neuropathic pain and antiretroviral-induced neuropathic pain is a plausible therapeutic option.