Activity-Dependent Gene Regulation in Health and Disease

In the last of this year’s Brain Prize webinars, Elizabeth Pollina (Washington University, USA), Eric Nestler (Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, USA) and Michelle Monje (Stanford University, USA) will present their work on activity-dependent gene regulation in health and disease. Each speaker will present for 25 minutes, and the webinar will conclude with an open discussion. The webinar will be moderated by the winners of the 2023 Brain Prize, Michael Greenberg, Erin Schuman and Christine Holt.

NMC4 Short Talk: Rank similarity filters for computationally-efficient machine learning on high dimensional data

Real world datasets commonly contain nonlinearly separable classes, requiring nonlinear classifiers. However, these classifiers are less computationally efficient than their linear counterparts. This inefficiency wastes energy, resources and time. We were inspired by the efficiency of the brain to create a novel type of computationally efficient Artificial Neural Network (ANN) called Rank Similarity Filters. They can be used to both transform and classify nonlinearly separable datasets with many datapoints and dimensions. The weights of the filters are set using the rank orders of features in a datapoint, or optionally the 'confusion' adjusted ranks between features (determined from their distributions in the dataset). The activation strength of a filter determines its similarity to other points in the dataset, a measure based on cosine similarity. The activation of many Rank Similarity Filters transforms samples into a new nonlinear space suitable for linear classification (Rank Similarity Transform (RST)). We additionally used this method to create the nonlinear Rank Similarity Classifier (RSC), which is a fast and accurate multiclass classifier, and the nonlinear Rank Similarity Probabilistic Classifier (RSPC), which is an extension to the multilabel case. We evaluated the classifiers on multiple datasets and RSC is competitive with existing classifiers but with superior computational efficiency. Code for RST, RSC and RSPC is open source and was written in Python using the popular scikit-learn framework to make it easily accessible (https://github.com/KatharineShapcott/rank-similarity). In future extensions the algorithm can be applied to hardware suitable for the parallelization of an ANN (GPU) and a Spiking Neural Network (neuromorphic computing) with corresponding performance gains. This makes Rank Similarity Filters a promising biologically inspired solution to the problem of efficient analysis of nonlinearly separable data.

Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease and related disorders

A discussion on the necessity for Open Source Hardware in neuroscience research

Research tools are paramount for scientific development, they enable researchers to observe and manipulate natural phenomena, learn their principles, make predictions and develop new technologies, treatments and improve living standards. Due to their costs and the geographical distribution of manufacturing companies access to them is not widely available, hindering the pace of research, the ability of many communities to contribute to science and education and reap its benefits. One possible solution for this issue is to create research tools under the open source ethos, where all documentation about them (including their designs, building and operating instructions) are made freely available. Dubbed Open Science Hardware (OSH), this production method follows the established and successful principles of open source software and brings many advantages over traditional creation methods such as: economic savings (see Pearce 2020 for potential economic savings in developing open source research tools), distributed manufacturing, repairability, and higher customizability. This development method has been greatly facilitated by recent technological developments in fast prototyping tools, Internet infrastructure, documentation platforms and lower costs of electronic off-the-shelf components. Taken together these benefits have the potential to make research more inclusive, equitable, distributed and most importantly, more reliable and reproducible, as - 1) researchers can know their tools inner workings in minute detail - 2) they can calibrate their tools before every experiment and having them running in optimal condition everytime - 3) given their lower price point, a)students can be trained/taught with hands on classes, b) several copies of the same instrument can be built leading to a parallelization of data collection and the creation of more robust datasets. - 4) Labs across the world can share the exact same type of instruments and create collaborative projects with standardized data collection and sharing.