experimental design

Examining the foundations of reading comprehension: a longitudinal study of brain and behavior starting in infancy

SUMMARY Reading comprehension (RC) is one of the most complex skills that we utilize daily and is crucial for functioning in modern society, but despite its significance for academic achievement, employment prospects, and mental health, many children and adults do not exhibit proficient RC abilities. New theoretical models aiming to explain variability in RC suggest a dynamic interplay and co-development among ‘precursor’ foundational and cognitive- linguistic skills, interacting with environmental and socio-ecological factors across the developmental timeline of learning to read. Behavioral and neuroimaging studies in school-age children have demonstrated critical mechanistic support for these multifactorial RC models by identifying the developmental trajectories of precursor skills and further showing that brain areas, tracts, and networks typically underlying language and cognitive skills are also involved in RC. Nevertheless, the precursor skills that support RC start developing in infancy and the brain correlates underlying these precursors begin to develop in utero, which suggests that typical and atypical RC developmental trajectories could diverge long before school age. As such, examining RC development using a multifactorial, longitudinal approach that includes brain and behavior starting in infancy is critical for developing theoretical frameworks that can inform early preventative and intervention strategies. Here, we propose a comprehensive longitudinal study of RC development in which we examine direct and indirect effects on RC from brain, behavioral, familial risk, and environmental data from infancy to adolescence. To achieve this goal, we will combine two existing longitudinal cohorts, one ranging from infancy to late childhood (n = 174) and the other from preschool to early adolescence (n = 137). By applying state-of-the-art pediatric neuroimaging analyses, multiple indicator growth model structural equation models, and an innovative behavior- brain co-development measurement index to this unique, combined dataset, we will be able to identify brain and behavioral measures in infancy that directly and indirectly support subsequent RC development (Aim1). We will further characterize how longitudinal trajectories of behavioral measures as well as brain structure, function, and white matter organization contribute to RC development and how familial risk and environmental factors shape these trajectories (Aim 2). Finally, we will examine how the co-development of brain and behavior, as measured with an innovative co-development index, relates to subsequent RC (Aim 3). If successful, we will contribute the first multifactorial longitudinal model of RC development comprising direct and indirect effects from brain, behavior, brain-behavior co-development, familial risk, and environmental measures beginning in infancy. Understanding RC development using a multifactorial longitudinal lens will be crucial for building theoretical models and developing experimental designs focused on early preventative and intervention approaches long before the start of formal schooling.

Using Adversarial Collaboration to Harness Collective Intelligence

There are many mysteries in the universe. One of the most significant, often considered the final frontier in science, is understanding how our subjective experience, or consciousness, emerges from the collective action of neurons in biological systems. While substantial progress has been made over the past decades, a unified and widely accepted explanation of the neural mechanisms underpinning consciousness remains elusive. The field is rife with theories that frequently provide contradictory explanations of the phenomenon. To accelerate progress, we have adopted a new model of science: adversarial collaboration in team science. Our goal is to test theories of consciousness in an adversarial setting. Adversarial collaboration offers a unique way to bolster creativity and rigor in scientific research by merging the expertise of teams with diverse viewpoints. Ideally, we aim to harness collective intelligence, embracing various perspectives, to expedite the uncovering of scientific truths. In this talk, I will highlight the effectiveness (and challenges) of this approach using selected case studies, showcasing its potential to counter biases, challenge traditional viewpoints, and foster innovative thought. Through the joint design of experiments, teams incorporate a competitive aspect, ensuring comprehensive exploration of problems. This method underscores the importance of structured conflict and diversity in propelling scientific advancement and innovation.

Doubting the neurofeedback double-blind do participants have residual awareness of experimental purposes in neurofeedback studies?

Neurofeedback provides a feedback display which is linked with on-going brain activity and thus allows self-regulation of neural activity in specific brain regions associated with certain cognitive functions and is considered a promising tool for clinical interventions. Recent reviews of neurofeedback have stressed the importance of applying the “double-blind” experimental design where critically the patient is unaware of the neurofeedback treatment condition. An important question then becomes; is double-blind even possible? Or are subjects aware of the purposes of the neurofeedback experiment? – this question is related to the issue of how we assess awareness or the absence of awareness to certain information in human subjects. Fortunately, methods have been developed which employ neurofeedback implicitly, where the subject is claimed to have no awareness of experimental purposes when performing the neurofeedback. Implicit neurofeedback is intriguing and controversial because it runs counter to the first neurofeedback study, which showed a link between awareness of being in a certain brain state and control of the neurofeedback-derived brain activity. Claiming that humans are unaware of a specific type of mental content is a notoriously difficult endeavor. For instance, what was long held as wholly unconscious phenomena, such as dreams or subliminal perception, have been overturned by more sensitive measures which show that degrees of awareness can be detected. In this talk, I will discuss whether we will critically examine the claim that we can know for certain that a neurofeedback experiment was performed in an unconscious manner. I will present evidence that in certain neurofeedback experiments such as manipulations of attention, participants display residual degrees of awareness of experimental contingencies to alter their cognition.

Maths, AI and Neuroscience Meeting Stockholm

To understand brain function and develop artificial general intelligence it has become abundantly clear that there should be a close interaction among Neuroscience, machine learning and mathematics. There is a general hope that understanding the brain function will provide us with more powerful machine learning algorithms. On the other hand advances in machine learning are now providing the much needed tools to not only analyse brain activity data but also to design better experiments to expose brain function. Both neuroscience and machine learning explicitly or implicitly deal with high dimensional data and systems. Mathematics can provide powerful new tools to understand and quantify the dynamics of biological and artificial systems as they generate behavior that may be perceived as intelligent.

Understanding neural dynamics in high dimensions across multiple timescales: from perception to motor control and learning

Remarkable advances in experimental neuroscience now enable us to simultaneously observe the activity of many neurons, thereby providing an opportunity to understand how the moment by moment collective dynamics of the brain instantiates learning and cognition. However, efficiently extracting such a conceptual understanding from large, high dimensional neural datasets requires concomitant advances in theoretically driven experimental design, data analysis, and neural circuit modeling. We will discuss how the modern frameworks of high dimensional statistics and deep learning can aid us in this process. In particular we will discuss: (1) how unsupervised tensor component analysis and time warping can extract unbiased and interpretable descriptions of how rapid single trial circuit dynamics change slowly over many trials to mediate learning; (2) how to tradeoff very different experimental resources, like numbers of recorded neurons and trials to accurately discover the structure of collective dynamics and information in the brain, even without spike sorting; (3) deep learning models that accurately capture the retina’s response to natural scenes as well as its internal structure and function; (4) algorithmic approaches for simplifying deep network models of perception; (5) optimality approaches to explain cell-type diversity in the first steps of vision in the retina.

Learning under uncertainty in autism and anxiety

Optimally interacting with a changeable and uncertain world requires estimating and representing uncertainty. Psychiatric and neurodevelopmental conditions such as anxiety and autism are characterized by an altered response to uncertainty. I will review the evidence for these phenomena from computational modelling, and outline the planned experiments from our lab to add further weight to these ideas. If time allows, I will present results from a control sample in a novel task interrogating a particular type of uncertainty and their associated transdiagnostic psychiatric traits.

Consciousness, falsification and epistemic constraints

Consciousness is a phenomenon unlike any other studied in natural science. Yet when building theories and designing experiments, we often proceed as if this were not the case. In this talk, I present two recent investigations of mine which explore the implications of consciousness' unique epistemic context for scientific theory building and experimental design. The first investigation is concerned with falsifications of theories of consciousness and identifies a rather deep problem in the usual scheme of testing theories. The second is an axiomatization and subsequent formalization of some of consciousness' more problematic epistemic features that allows to precisely quantify where the usual scientific methodology ceases to be applicable. For both cases, I indicate ways to resolve the problem.

Theoretical and computational approaches to neuroscience with complex models in high dimensions across multiple timescales: from perception to motor control and learning

Remarkable advances in experimental neuroscience now enable us to simultaneously observe the activity of many neurons, thereby providing an opportunity to understand how the moment by moment collective dynamics of the brain instantiates learning and cognition.  However, efficiently extracting such a conceptual understanding from large, high dimensional neural datasets requires concomitant advances in theoretically driven experimental design, data analysis, and neural circuit modeling.  We will discuss how the modern frameworks of high dimensional statistics and deep learning can aid us in this process.  In particular we will discuss: how unsupervised tensor component analysis and time warping can extract unbiased and interpretable descriptions of how rapid single trial circuit dynamics change slowly over many trials to mediate learning; how to tradeoff very different experimental resources, like numbers of recorded neurons and trials to accurately discover the structure of collective dynamics and information in the brain, even without spike sorting; deep learning models that accurately capture the retina’s response to natural scenes as well as its internal structure and function; algorithmic approaches for simplifying deep network models of perception; optimality approaches to explain cell-type diversity in the first steps of vision in the retina.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of an executive function training program coupled with transcranial stimulation in brain-injured patients: Preliminary results of a Single Case Experimental Design