When experts are immersed in a task, a natural assumption is that their brains prioritize task-related activity. Accordingly, most efforts to understand neural activity during well-learned tasks focus on cognitive computations and task-related movements. Surprisingly, we observed that during decision-making, the cortex-wide activity of multiple cell types is dominated by movements, especially “uninstructed movements”, that are spontaneously expressed. These observations argue that animals execute expert decisions while performing richly varied, uninstructed movements that profoundly shape neural activity. To understand the relationship between these movements and decision-making, we examined the movements more closely. We tested whether the magnitude or the timing of the movements was correlated with decision-making performance. To do this, we partitioned movements into two groups: task-aligned movements that were well predicted by task events (such as the onset of the sensory stimulus or choice) and task independent movement (TIM) that occurred independently of task events. TIM had a reliable, inverse correlation with performance in head-restrained mice and freely moving rats. This hinted that the timing of spontaneous movements could indicate periods of disengagement. To confirm this, we compared TIM to the latent behavioral states recovered by a hidden Markov model with Bernoulli generalized linear model observations (GLM-HMM) and found these, again, to be inversely correlated. Finally, we examined the impact of these behavioral states on neural activity. Surprisingly, we found that the same movement impacts neural activity more strongly when animals are disengaged. An intriguing possibility is that these larger movement signals disrupt cognitive computations, leading to poor decision-making performance. Taken together, these observations argue that movements and cognitionare closely intertwined, even during expert decision-making.

Over the last decade, research on curiosity – the desire to seek new information – has been rapidly growing. Several studies have shown that curiosity elicits activity within the dopaminergic circuit and thereby enhances hippocampus-dependent learning. However, given this new field of research, we do not have a good understanding yet of (i) how curiosity-based learning changes across the lifespan, (ii) why some people show better learning improvements due to curiosity than others, and (iii) whether lab-based research on curiosity translates to how curiosity affects information seeking in real life. In this talk, I will present a series of behavioural and neuroimaging studies that address these three questions about curiosity. First, I will present findings on how curiosity and interest affect learning differently in childhood and adolescence. Second, I will show data on how inter-individual differences in the magnitude of curiosity-based learning depend on the strength of resting-state functional connectivity within the cortico-mesolimbic dopaminergic circuit. Third, I will present findings on how the level of resting-state functional connectivity within this circuit is also associated with the frequency of real-life information seeking (i.e., about Covid-19-related news). Together, our findings help to refine our recently proposed framework – the Prediction, Appraisal, Curiosity, and Exploration (PACE) framework – that attempts to integrate theoretical ideas on the neurocognitive mechanisms of how curiosity is elicited, and how curiosity enhances learning and information seeking. Furthermore, our findings highlight the importance of curiosity research to better understand how curiosity can be harnessed to improve learning and information seeking in real life.

Metacognition has long been defined as “cognition about cognition”. One of its aspects is the error monitoring ability, which includes being aware of one’s own errors without external feedback. This ability is mostly investigated in two-alternative forced choice tasks, where the performance has all or none nature in terms of accuracy. The previous literature documents the effect of different influences on the error monitoring ability, such as working memory, feedback and sensorimotor involvement. However, these demonstrations fall short of generalizing to the real life scenarios where the errors often have a magnitude and a direction. To bridge this gap, recent studies showed that humans could keep track of the magnitude and the direction of their errors in temporal, spatial and numerical domains in two metrics: confidence and short-long/few-more judgements. This talk will cover how the documented effects that are obtained in the two alternative forced choices tasks apply to the temporal error monitoring ability. Finally, how magnitude and direction monitoring (i.e., confidence and short-long judgements) can be differentiated as the two indices of temporal error monitoring ability will be discussed.

In cognitive development, learning more than the input provides is a central challenge. This challenge is especially evident in learning the meaning of numbers. Integers – and the quantities they denote – are potentially infinite, as are the fractional values between every integer. Yet children’s experiences of numbers are necessarily finite. Analogy is a powerful learning mechanism for children to learn novel, abstract concepts from only limited input. However, retrieving proper analogy requires cognitive supports. In this talk, I seek to propose and examine number lines as a mathematical schema of the number system to facilitate both the development of rational number understanding and analogical reasoning. To examine these hypotheses, I will present a series of educational intervention studies with third-to-fifth graders. Results showed that a short, unsupervised intervention of spatial alignment between integers and fractions on number lines produced broad and durable gains in fractional magnitudes. Additionally, training on conceptual knowledge of fractions – that fractions denote magnitude and can be placed on number lines – facilitates explicit analogical reasoning. Together, these studies indicate that analogies can play an important role in rational number learning with the help of number lines as schemas. These studies shed light on helpful practices in STEM education curricula and instructions.

Graphics processing units (GPUs) are widely available and have been used with great success to accelerate scientific computing in the last decade. These advances, however, are often not available to researchers interested in simulating spiking neural networks, but lacking the technical knowledge to write the necessary low-level code. Writing low-level code is not necessary when using the popular Brian simulator, which provides a framework to generate efficient CPU code from high-level model definitions in Python. Here, we present Brian2CUDA, an open-source software that extends the Brian simulator with a GPU backend. Our implementation generates efficient code for the numerical integration of neuronal states and for the propagation of synaptic events on GPUs, making use of their massively parallel arithmetic capabilities. We benchmark the performance improvements of our software for several model types and find that it can accelerate simulations by up to three orders of magnitude compared to Brian’s CPU backend. Currently, Brian2CUDA is the only package that supports Brian’s full feature set on GPUs, including arbitrary neuron and synapse models, plasticity rules, and heterogeneous delays. When comparing its performance with Brian2GeNN, another GPU-based backend for the Brian simulator with fewer features, we find that Brian2CUDA gives comparable speedups, while being typically slower for small and faster for large networks. By combining the flexibility of the Brian simulator with the simulation speed of GPUs, Brian2CUDA enables researchers to efficiently simulate spiking neural networks with minimal effort and thereby makes the advancements of GPU computing available to a larger audience of neuroscientists.

Magnitude estimation and stimulus discrimination tasks are affected by perceptual biases that cause the stimulus parameter to be perceived as shifted toward the mean of its distribution. These biases have been extensively studied in psychophysics and, more recently and to a lesser extent, with neural activity recordings. New computational techniques allow us to train spiking recurrent neural networks on the tasks used in the experiments. This provides us with another valuable tool with which to investigate the network mechanisms responsible for the biases and how behavior could be modeled. As an example, in this talk I will consider networks trained to discriminate the durations of temporal intervals. The trained networks presented the contraction bias, even though they were trained with a stimulus sequence without temporal correlations. The neural activity during the delay period carried information about the stimuli of the current trial and previous trials, this being one of the mechanisms that originated the contraction bias. The population activity described trajectories in a low-dimensional space and their relative locations depended on the prior distribution. The results can be modeled as an ideal observer that during the delay period sees a combination of the current and the previous stimuli. Finally, I will describe how the neural trajectories in state space encode an estimate of the interval duration. The approach could be applied to other cognitive tasks.

The research in my lab focuses on sensory signal processing, particularly in cases where sensory systems perform at or near the limits imposed by physics. Photon counting in the visual system is a beautiful example. At its peak sensitivity, the performance of the visual system is limited largely by the division of light into discrete photons. This observation has several implications for phototransduction and signal processing in the retina: rod photoreceptors must transduce single photon absorptions with high fidelity, single photon signals in photoreceptors, which are only 0.03 – 0.1 mV, must be reliably transmitted to second-order cells in the retina, and absorption of a single photon by a single rod must produce a noticeable change in the pattern of action potentials sent from the eye to the brain. My approach is to combine quantitative physiological experiments and theory to understand photon counting in terms of basic biophysical mechanisms. Fortunately there is more to visual perception than counting photons. The visual system is very adept at operating over a wide range of light intensities (about 12 orders of magnitude). Over most of this range, vision is mediated by cone photoreceptors. Thus adaptation is paramount to cone vision. Again one would like to understand quantitatively how the biophysical mechanisms involved in phototransduction, synaptic transmission, and neural coding contribute to adaptation.

Error monitoring refers to the ability to monitor one's own task performance without explicit feedback. This ability is studied typically in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) paradigms. Recent research showed that humans can also keep track of the magnitude and direction of errors in different magnitude domains (e.g., numerosity, duration, length). Based on the evidence that suggests a shared mechanism for magnitude representations, we aimed to investigate whether metric error monitoring ability is commonly governed across different magnitude domains. Participants reproduced/estimated temporal, numerical, and spatial magnitudes after which they rated their confidence regarding first order task performance and judged the direction of their reproduction/estimation errors. Participants were also tested in a 2AFC perceptual decision task and provided confidence ratings regarding their decisions. Results showed that variability in reproductions/estimations and metric error monitoring ability, as measured by combining confidence and error direction judgements, were positively related across temporal, spatial, and numerical domains. Metacognitive sensitivity in these metric domains was also positively associated with each other but not with metacognitive sensitivity in the 2AFC perceptual decision task. In conclusion, the current findings point at a general metric error monitoring ability that is shared across different metric domains with limited generalizability to perceptual decision-making.

Two-photon (2P) in vivo functional imaging of genetically encoded fluorescent Ca2+indicators (GECIs) for neuronal activity has become a broadly applied standard tool in modern neuroscience, because it allows simultaneous imaging of the activity of many neurons at high spatial resolution within living animals. Unfortunately, the most commonly used light-sources – tunable femtosecond pulsed ti:sapphire lasers – can be prohibitively expensive for many labs and fall short of delivering sufficient powers for some new ultra-fast 2P microscopy modalities. Inexpensive homebuilt or industrial light sources such as Ytterbium fiber lasers (YbFLs) show great promise to overcome these limitations as they are becoming widely available at costs orders of magnitude lower and power outputs of up to many times higher than conventional ti:sapphire lasers. However, these lasers are typically bound to emitting a single wavelength (i.e., not tunable) centered around 1020-1060 nm, which fails to efficiently excite state of the art green GECIs such as jGCaMP7 or 8. To this end, we designed and characterized spectral variants (yellow CaMP = YCaMP) of the ultrasensitive genetically encoded calcium indicator jGCaMP7, that allows for efficient 2P-excitation at wavelengths above 1010nm. In this talk I will give a brief overview over some of the reasons why using a fiber laser for 2P excitation might be right for you. I will talk about the development of jYCaMP and some exciting new experimental avenues that it has opened while touching on the prospect that shifting biosensors yellow could have for the 2P imaging community. Please join me for an interesting and fun discussion on whether “yellow is the new green” after the talk!

The cerebellum permits a wide range of behaviors that involve sensorimotor integration. We have been investigating how specific cellular and synaptic specializations of cerebellar neurons measured in vitro, give rise to circuit activity in vivo. We have investigated these issues by studying Purkinje neurons as well as the large neurons of the mouse cerebellar nuclei, which form the major excitatory premotor projection from the cerebellum. Large CbN cells have ion channels that favor spontaneous action potential firing and GABAA receptors that generate ultra-fast inhibitory synaptic currents, raising the possibility that these biophysical attributes may permit CbN cells to respond differently to the degree of temporal coherence of their Purkinje cell inputs. In vivo, self-initiated motor programs associated with whisking correlates with asynchronous changes in Purkinje cell simple spiking that are asynchronous across the population. The resulting inhibition converges with mossy fiber excitation to yield little change in CbN cell firing, such that cerebellar output is low or cancelled. In contrast, externally applied sensory stimuli elicits a transient, synchronous inhibition of Purkinje cell simple spiking. During the resulting strong disinhibition of CbN cells, sensory-induced excitation from mossy fibers effectively drives cerebellar outputs that increase the magnitude of reflexive whisking. Purkinje cell synchrony, therefore, may be a key variable contributing to the “positive effort” hypothesized by David Marr in 1969 to be necessary for cerebellar control of movement.

Rapidly changing inputs such as visual scenes and auditory landscapes are transmitted over several synaptic interfaces and perceived with little loss of detail, but individual neurons are typically “noisy” and cortico-cortical connections are typically “weak”. To understand how information embodied in spike train is transmitted in a lossless manner, we focus on a single synaptic interface: between pyramidal cells and putative interneurons. Using arbitrary white noise patterns injected intra-cortically as photocurrents to freely-moving mice, we find that directly-activated cells exhibit precision of several milliseconds, but post-synaptic, indirectly-activated cells exhibit higher precision. Considering multiple identical messages, the reliability of directly-activated cells peaks at a timescale of dozens of milliseconds, whereas indirectly-activated cells exhibit an order-of-magnitude faster timescale. Using data-driven modelling, we find that error correction is consistent with non-linear amplification of coincident spikes.

The normally functioning blood-brain barrier (BBB) regulates the transfer of material between blood and brain. BBB dysfunction has long been recognized in multiple sclerosis (MS), and there is considerable interest in quantifying functional aspects of brain blood vessels and their role in disease progression. Parenchymal water content and its association with volume regulation is important for proper brain function, and is one of the key roles of the BBB. There is convincing evidence that the astrocyte is critical in establishing and maintaining a functional BBB and providing metabolic support to neurons. Increasing evidence suggests that functional interactions between endothelia, pericytes, astrocytes, and neurons, collectively known as the neurovascular unit, contribute to brain water regulation, capillary blood volume and flow, BBB permeability, and are responsive to metabolic demands. Increasing evidence suggests altered metabolism in MS brain which may contribute to reduced neuro-repair and increased neurodegeneration. Metabolically relevant biomarkers may provide sensitive readouts of brain tissue at risk of degeneration, and magnetic resonance offers substantial promise in this regard. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI combined with appropriate pharmacokinetic modeling allows quantification of distinct features of BBB including permeabilities to contrast agent and water, with rate constants that differ by six orders of magnitude. Mapping of these rate constants provides unique biological aspects of brain vasculature relevant to MS.

The "mind of the worm", the first electron microscopy-based connectome of C. elegans, was an early sign of where connectomics is headed, followed by a long time of little progress in a field held back by the immense manual effort required for data acquisition and analysis. This changed over the last few years with several technological breakthroughs, which allowed increases in data set sizes by several orders of magnitude. Brain tissue can now be imaged in 3D up to a millimeter in size at nanometer resolution, revealing tissue features from synapses to the mitochondria of all contained cells. These breakthroughs in acquisition technology were paralleled by a revolution in deep-learning segmentation techniques, that equally reduced manual analysis times by several orders of magnitude, to the point where fully automated reconstructions are becoming useful. Taken together, this gives neuroscientists now access to the first wiring diagrams of thousands of automatically reconstructed neurons connected by millions of synapses, just one line of program code away. In this talk, I will cover these developments by describing the past few years' technological breakthroughs and discuss remaining challenges. Finally, I will show the potential of automated connectomics for neuroscience by demonstrating how hypotheses in reinforcement learning can now be tackled through virtual experiments in synaptic wiring diagrams of the songbird basal ganglia.

A variety of pharmacological treatments exist for patients suffering from focal seizures, but systemically administered drugs offer only symptomatic relief and frequently cause unwanted side effects. Moreover, available drugs are ineffective in one third of the patients. Thus, developing more targeted and effective treatment strategies is highly warranted. Neurotrophic factors are candidates for treating epilepsy, but their development has been hampered by difficulties in achieving stable and targeted delivery of efficacious concentrations within the brain. We have developed an implantable cell encapsulation system that delivers high and consistent levels of neurotrophic molecules directly to a specific brain region. The potential of this approach has been tested by delivering glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) to the hippocampus of epileptic rats. In vivo studies demonstrated that these intrahippocampal implants continue to secrete GDNF and produce high hippocampal GDNF tissue levels in a long-lasting manner. Identical implants rapidly and greatly reduced seizure frequency in the pilocarpine model. This effect increased in magnitude over 3 months, ultimately leading to a reduction of spontaneous seizures by more than 90%. Importantly, these effects were accompanied by improvements in cognition and anxiety, and by the normalization of many histological alterations that are associated with chronic epilepsy. In addition, the antiseizure effect persisted even after device removal. Finally, by establishing a unilateral epileptic focus using the intrahippocampal kainate model, we found that delivery of GDNF exclusively within the focus suppressed already established spontaneous recurrent seizures. Together, these results support the concept that the implantation of encapsulated GDNF-secreting cells can deliver GDNF in a sustained, targeted, and efficacious manner. These findings may form the basis for clinical translation of this approach.