methodology

Assessing the Efficacy of Mindfulness Apps

PROJECT SUMMARY: Rates of depression continue to rise and the mental health impact of COVID-19 has only accelerated trends. While mental health apps, specifically mindfulness apps, are not a panacea, they are popular tools that millions are turning to today for easy access, affordable, and low-stigma help. But increased reliance on mindfulness apps has not been supported by rigorous scientific evidence exemplified by few studies employing appropriate control conditions. Thus, this research is designed to focus on using 100% remote but robust methodology to assess the efficacy of mindfulness apps by applying a novel precision medicine framework. Our study first assesses the impact of the Digital Working Alliance by matching people with depression with a mindfulness app that may better support their personalized needs. We will compare those randomized to the to this matching condition to a digital placebo to better evaluate the efficacy of these mindfulness apps. For the first six weeks, participants will be asked to use the mindfulness app or digital placebo daily, and if not engaged, will receive reminders, allowing for the analysis of clinical outcomes during ideal usage patterns. For an additional six weeks, participants will be asked to use the app or digital placebo naturally, allowing for the elucidation of naturalistic usage patterns and evaluation if these usage patterns impact clinical outcomes. Across the entire study, we will capture smartphone-based digital phenotypes of behaviors (eg sleep, step, screen time), environments (eg home time, greenspace exposure), and symptoms (longitudinal ecological momentary assessment) to create personalized and predictive models of response that can be utilized to better understand factors impacting the efficacy of mindfulness apps, and in the future, better tailor apps to each person.

Molecular Mechanism of Immunoglobulin Class Switch Recombination

Antibodies produced by B cells are a critical component of the adaptive immune system in mammals that can respond to and clear a plethora of different pathogens. A key property of B cells is their ability to alter the coding sequence of the immunoglobulin heavy and light chain genes, via VDJ-recombination, somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR). While VDJ-recombination and SHM alter the variable regions of antibodies that directly contact pathogen antigens, CSR changes the constant region of the antibody, which dictates its effector function to optimally respond to the antigen recognized by the antibody. CSR occurs via targeted DNA double strand break (DSB) induction in the switch regions preceding the distinct constant region coding sequences. DSB induction requires active transcription of the switch regions and is initiated by activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) induced cytosine deamination (converting cytosine to uracil) within the switch regions. Fusion of the DSBs in the switch regions results in deletion of intervening genomic sequence, completing CSR. Since AID is inherently a mutagenic enzyme that can trigger both point mutations and genomic translocations, its activity has to be tightly controlled, and aberrant AID activity has been directly implicated in the genetic changes that lead to B cell lymphoma formation. Thus, define the molecular mechanism of CSR is critical to understand our adaptive immune system and B cell cancer development, both highly relevant to human health. To study CSR in living B cells, cellular models have been developed to analyze AID function and switch region transcription at the single molecule level. With this new methodology, the critical unanswered question of how AID is specifically recruited to the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus and not other genomic locations will be addressed. In addition, the overall kinetics of CSR will be determined and how transcription controls specific DSB induction in switch regions will be defined. The results of these works will significantly advance our understanding of CSR and provide new insights on how AID contributes to B cell lymphoma formation.

Role of Two Medial Prefrontal Long-Range Recurrent Networks in Behavior Initiation and Inhibition

Abstract The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is critical for executive function, yet how its dorsal (dmPFC) and ventral (vmPFC) motor-projecting (MP) neurons coordinate behavioral initiation, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility remains poorly understood. This R21 leverages four translational behavioral paradigms (head-fixed Persistent Licking/Shock-Escape; freely moving FED3-based Reversal Learning/Stop-Signal), high-density neural recordings, circuit manipulations, and Brian2 spiking neural network modeling to test our central hypothesis: dmPFC MP neurons drive action initiation and adaptive switching, while vmPFC MP neurons suppress impulsivity and perseveration. In Aim 1a, we quantify behavior using kinematic analyses (jerk, velocity, z-scored) aligned with human executive dysfunction metrics (Action Latency [AL], Reversal Accuracy [RA], Perseveration Errors [PE], Stop-Signal Reaction Time [SSRT]), combined with optogenetic (stGtACR2/ChR2) and chemogenetic (PSAM/varenicline) perturbations. Aim 1b employs optotagging and population analyses (PCA, SVM, Total Spiking Probability Edges) to decode dmPFC/vmPFC MP dynamics across tasks, resolving specialized versus mixed functional roles. Aim 1c integrates these datasets into Brian2 spiking network models to predict neural-behavioral correlations, validated through cross-validation. Exploratory analyses will link murine kinematic signatures to human stop-signal/reversal learning metrics. By elucidating strain-specific (C57BL/6 vs. CD1) circuit mechanisms and delivering translatable biomarkers (AL, RA, PE, SSRT, kinematics), this work addresses a critical gap in understanding neuropsychiatric disorders like ADHD (impulsivity) and schizophrenia (perseveration). The study’s innovative combination of recurrent neural network theory, FED3-based assays, and New Approach Methodology (NAM)-compliant computational modeling pioneers high-risk, high-reward tools for circuit dissection, fully aligning with NIH’s 2025 priorities.

Optimizing gamma-delta T cell receptor-mediated signaling to improve cancer immunotherapy

PROJECT SUMMARY The recent development of T cell-based cancer immunotherapies, including checkpoint blockade (anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4 and others) or adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using modified patient T cells, has led to improved patient outcomes for a variety of cancers. However, durable responses are observed in only a fraction of patients. Further progress can be made by studying and targeting different T cell subpopulations, such as the gd T cells which are known to possess antitumor activities. Further, gd T cells are mostly independent of MHC-restriction, unconstrained by neoantigen burden, preferential homing to peripheral tissues and possess unique properties of T cells as well as natural killer cells making them an extremely attractive cancer immunotherapy target. One way of gd T cell activation involves the gd T cell receptor (gdTCR)-CD3 signaling pathway. gd T cell recognition of antigen by the gdTCR and the resulting proximal signaling through surrounding CD3 subunits are key steps of gd T cell activation. Even though the individual components of the gdTCR-CD3 and abTCR-CD3 complexes remain the same except for the TCRs, the complete gdTCR-CD3 complex extracellular structure is unknown. Identification of the specific extracellular interactions between the gdTCR and CD3 subunits could offer precise guidance for the development of immunotherapeutic strategies that modulate gdT cell immunity by targeting signaling through the gdTCR-CD3 complex. Our previous data showed that mutating residues in the constant domain of the abTCR resulted in altered ab T cell cytokine responses. Based on this data, our hypothesis is that gdTCR-CD3 signaling can also be modulated by targeting specific regions of the gdTCR by mutagenesis to improve gd T cell antitumor activities. To test our hypothesis, in Aim 1, we will use a novel photo-crosslinking and computational docking methodology to solve the complete extracellular structure of a gdTCR-CD3 complex. Further, we will use an in silico structure-based TCR design approach to identify gdTCR mutants that enhance signaling. In Aim 2, we will use an in vitro retroviral TCR display method using degenerate primers to create gdTCR mutant libraries at specific gdTCR sites such as Cg helix 3 and connecting peptide (CP) regions. In both instances, identified mutants will be tested for improved functionalities in an MHC-independent gd TCR (G115 Vg9Vd2 TCR) using in vitro cytokine and tumor-killing assays. Overall, the newly identified enhanced gd T cell clones could potentially lead to a new wave of effective cancer immunotherapy strategy by leaning into the largely untapped potential of gd T cells.

Personalized Spatial Regulatory Networks to Decode Breast Cancer Microenvironments

PROJECT SUMMARY Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype with early recurrence, high metastatic burden, and limited treatment options. While genomic alterations contribute to its progression, epigenetic plasticity and spatial organization within the tumor microenvironment (TME) play critical roles in intra-tumor heterogeneity, immune evasion, and therapy resistance, yet remain poorly understood. To address this, we will develop a cost- effective and scalable methodology that integrates spatial ATAC-seq, spatial in situ transcriptomics (Xenium), and single-nucleus (sn) Epi Multiome sequencing (snRNA-seq + snATAC-seq) from core-needle biopsies, enabling high-resolution mapping of gene regulatory networks within the intact TME. Our preliminary data from six TNBC biopsies demonstrate that spatial in situ transcriptomics and spatial ATAC-seq provide critical insights into tissue architecture but suffer from data sparsity, necessitating the integration of single-nucleus Epi Multiome data to enhance cell-type annotation and impute missing genomic features. In Aim 1, we will establish a multi- modal workflow that maximizes molecular insights from limited biopsy material by optimizing tissue-preserving and multiplexed sequencing approaches. This includes leveraging patient-specific genetic variation to deconvolute nuclei-derived data and linking it to spatial transcriptomic and spatial chromatin accessibility profiles. In Aim 2, we will develop a computational framework to integrate these multi-layered datasets, enabling spatially resolved epigenomic-transcriptomic analysis that identifies key regulatory chromatin elements and transcriptional programs associated with TNBC progression, immune infiltration, and therapy resistance. This project will generate the first comprehensive, patient-specific spatial regulatory atlas of TNBC, providing fundamental insights into how chromatin accessibility and gene expression interact within the TME. Ultimately, this work will pave the way for novel precision oncology strategies, biomarker discovery, and the development of targeted therapies that address TNBC’s spatial and molecular heterogeneity.

Recent views on pre-registration

A discussion on some recent perspectives on pre-registration, which has become a growing trend in the past few years. This is not just limited to neuroimaging, and it applies to most scientific fields. We will start with this overview editorial by Simmons et al. (2021): https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/34-Simmons-Nelson-Simonsohn-2021a.pdf, and also talk about a more critical perspective by Pham & Oh (2021): https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michel-Pham/publication/349545600_Preregistration_Is_Neither_Sufficient_nor_Necessary_for_Good_Science/links/60fb311e2bf3553b29096aa7/Preregistration-Is-Neither-Sufficient-nor-Necessary-for-Good-Science.pdf. I would like us to discuss the pros and cons of pre-registration, and if we have time, I may do a demonstration of how to perform a pre-registration through the Open Science Framework.

Fear learning induces synaptic potentiation between engram neurons in the rat lateral amygdala

Fear learning induces synaptic potentiation between engram neurons in the rat lateral amygdala. This study by Marios Abatis et al. demonstrates how fear conditioning strengthens synaptic connections between engram cells in the lateral amygdala, revealed through optogenetic identification of neuronal ensembles and electrophysiological measurements. The work provides crucial insights into memory formation mechanisms at the synaptic level, with implications for understanding anxiety disorders and developing targeted interventions. Presented by Dr. Kenneth Hayworth, this journal club will explore the paper's methodology linking engram cell reactivation with synaptic plasticity measurements, and discuss implications for memory decoding research.

Use case determines the validity of neural systems comparisons

Deep learning provides new data-driven tools to relate neural activity to perception and cognition, aiding scientists in developing theories of neural computation that increasingly resemble biological systems both at the level of behavior and of neural activity. But what in a deep neural network should correspond to what in a biological system? This question is addressed implicitly in the use of comparison measures that relate specific neural or behavioral dimensions via a particular functional form. However, distinct comparison methodologies can give conflicting results in recovering even a known ground-truth model in an idealized setting, leaving open the question of what to conclude from the outcome of a systems comparison using any given methodology. Here, we develop a framework to make explicit and quantitative the effect of both hypothesis-driven aspects—such as details of the architecture of a deep neural network—as well as methodological choices in a systems comparison setting. We demonstrate via the learning dynamics of deep neural networks that, while the role of the comparison methodology is often de-emphasized relative to hypothesis-driven aspects, this choice can impact and even invert the conclusions to be drawn from a comparison between neural systems. We provide evidence that the right way to adjudicate a comparison depends on the use case—the scientific hypothesis under investigation—which could range from identifying single-neuron or circuit-level correspondences to capturing generalizability to new stimulus properties

Event-related frequency adjustment (ERFA): A methodology for investigating neural entrainment

Neural entrainment has become a phenomenon of exceptional interest to neuroscience, given its involvement in rhythm perception, production, and overt synchronized behavior. Yet, traditional methods fail to quantify neural entrainment due to a misalignment with its fundamental definition (e.g., see Novembre and Iannetti, 2018; Rajandran and Schupp, 2019). The definition of entrainment assumes that endogenous oscillatory brain activity undergoes dynamic frequency adjustments to synchronize with environmental rhythms (Lakatos et al., 2019). Following this definition, we recently developed a method sensitive to this process. Our aim was to isolate from the electroencephalographic (EEG) signal an oscillatory component that is attuned to the frequency of a rhythmic stimulation, hypothesizing that the oscillation would adaptively speed up and slow down to achieve stable synchronization over time. To induce and measure these adaptive changes in a controlled fashion, we developed the event-related frequency adjustment (ERFA) paradigm (Rosso et al., 2023). A total of twenty healthy participants took part in our study. They were instructed to tap their finger synchronously with an isochronous auditory metronome, which was unpredictably perturbed by phase-shifts and tempo-changes in both positive and negative directions across different experimental conditions. EEG was recorded during the task, and ERFA responses were quantified as changes in instantaneous frequency of the entrained component. Our results indicate that ERFAs track the stimulus dynamics in accordance with the perturbation type and direction, preferentially for a sensorimotor component. The clear and consistent patterns confirm that our method is sensitive to the process of frequency adjustment that defines neural entrainment. In this Virtual Journal Club, the discussion of our findings will be complemented by methodological insights beneficial to researchers in the fields of rhythm perception and production, as well as timing in general. We discuss the dos and don’ts of using instantaneous frequency to quantify oscillatory dynamics, the advantages of adopting a multivariate approach to source separation, the robustness against the confounder of responses evoked by periodic stimulation, and provide an overview of domains and concrete examples where the methodological framework can be applied.

Brain Connectivity Workshop

Founded in 2002, the Brain Connectivity Workshop (BCW) is an annual international meeting for in-depth discussions of all aspects of brain connectivity research. By bringing together experts in computational neuroscience, neuroscience methodology and experimental neuroscience, it aims to improve the understanding of the relationship between anatomical connectivity, brain dynamics and cognitive function. These workshops have a unique format, featuring only short presentations followed by intense discussion. This year’s workshop is co-organised by Wellcome, putting the spotlight on brain connectivity in mental health disorders. We look forward to having you join us for this exciting, thought-provoking and inclusive event.

A new experimental paradigm to study analogy transfer

Analogical reasoning is one of the most complex cognitive functions in humans that allows abstract thinking, high-level reasoning, and learning. Based on analogical reasoning, one can extract an abstract and general concept (i.e., an analogy schema) from a familiar situation and apply it to a new context or domain (i.e., analogy transfer). These processes allow us to solve problems we never encountered before and generate new ideas. However, the place of analogy transfer in problem solving mechanisms is unclear. This presentation will describe several experiments with three main findings. First, we show how analogy transfer facilitates problem-solving, replicating existing empirical data largely based on the radiation/fortress problems with four new riddles. Second, we propose a new experimental task that allows us to quantify analogy transfer. Finally, using science network methodology, we show how restructuring the mental representation of a problem can predict successful solving of an analogous problem. These results shed new light on the cognitive mechanism underlying solution transfer by analogy and provide a new tool to quantify individual abilities.

What is Cognitive Neuropsychology Good For? An Unauthorized Biography

Abstract: There is no doubt that the study of brain damaged individuals has contributed greatly to our understanding of the mind/brain. Within this broad approach, cognitive neuropsychology accentuates the cognitive dimension: it investigates the structure and organization of perceptual, motor, cognitive, and language systems – prerequisites for understanding the functional organization of the brain – through the analysis of their dysfunction following brain damage. Significant insights have come specifically from this paradigm. But progress has been slow and enthusiasm for this approach has waned somewhat in recent years, and the use of existing findings to constrain new theories has also waned. What explains the current diminished status of cognitive neuropsychology? One reason may be failure to calibrate expectations about the effective contribution of different subfields of the study of the mind/brain as these are determined by their natural peculiarities – such factors as the types of available observations and their complexity, opportunity of access to such observations, the possibility of controlled experimentation, and the like. Here, I also explore the merits and limitations of cognitive neuropsychology, with particular focus on the role of intellectual, pragmatic, and societal factors that determine scientific practice within the broader domains of cognitive science/neuroscience. I conclude on an optimistic note about the continuing unique importance of cognitive neuropsychology: although limited to the study of experiments of nature, it offers a privileged window into significant aspects of the mind/brain that are not easily accessible through other approaches. Biography: Alfonso Caramazza's research has focussed extensively on how words and their meanings are represented in the brain. His early pioneering studies helped to reformulate our thinking about Broca's aphasia (not limited to production) and formalised the logic of patient-based neuropsychology. More recently he has been instrumental in reconsidering popular claims about embodied cognition.

Common elements: An innovative methodology for identifying effective interventions in early childhood education

Evidence-based education programmes, like many clinical interventions, are multi-faceted and can be expensive to implement. In this talk I will describe an alternative: distilling the common elements across many evidence-based programmes. Published programme manuals are selected through systematic review, then extensively coded and cross-referenced. Finally, the common elements that emerge are shared with practitioners as part of a ‘library’ of practices (rather than a holistic programme manual). Although the common elements methodology has been used in the prevention and intervention sciences, this project reflects the first attempt at applying this approach to early childhood education. I will describe the common elements methods and preliminary findings from our Nuffield-funded project, in collaboration with the Early Intervention Foundation. I will discuss the challenges and opportunities we have encountered, alongside our strategies for sharing evidence with practitioners in a digestible way.

Event-based Backpropagation for Exact Gradients in Spiking Neural Networks

Gradient-based optimization powered by the backpropagation algorithm proved to be the pivotal method in the training of non-spiking artificial neural networks. At the same time, spiking neural networks hold the promise for efficient processing of real-world sensory data by communicating using discrete events in continuous time. We derive the backpropagation algorithm for a recurrent network of spiking (leaky integrate-and-fire) neurons with hard thresholds and show that the backward dynamics amount to an event-based backpropagation of errors through time. Our derivation uses the jump conditions for partial derivatives at state discontinuities found by applying the implicit function theorem, allowing us to avoid approximations or substitutions. We find that the gradient exists and is finite almost everywhere in weight space, up to the null set where a membrane potential is precisely tangent to the threshold. Our presented algorithm, EventProp, computes the exact gradient with respect to a general loss function based on spike times and membrane potentials. Crucially, the algorithm allows for an event-based communication scheme in the backward phase, retaining the potential advantages of temporal sparsity afforded by spiking neural networks. We demonstrate the optimization of spiking networks using gradients computed via EventProp and the Yin-Yang and MNIST datasets with either a spike time-based or voltage-based loss function and report competitive performance. Our work supports the rigorous study of gradient-based optimization in spiking neural networks as well as the development of event-based neuromorphic architectures for the efficient training of spiking neural networks. While we consider the leaky integrate-and-fire model in this work, our methodology generalises to any neuron model defined as a hybrid dynamical system.

3 Minutes Thesis Competition: Pre-selection event

On behalf of NeurotechEU, we are pleased to invite you to participate in the Summit 2021 pre-selection event on October 23, 2021. The event will be held online via the Platform Crowdcast.io, and it is going to be organized by NeurotechEU-The European University of Brain and Technology. Students from all over NeurotechEU have the chance to present their research (bachelor’s thesis, Master’s thesis, PhD, post-doc…) following the methodology of three minutes thesis (3MT from the University of Queensland): https://threeminutethesis.uq.edu.au/resources/3mt-competitor-guide. There will be one session per university and at the end of it, two semi-finalists will be selected from each university. They will compete in the Summit 2021 on November 22nd. There will be prizes for the winners who will be selected by voting of the audience.

Brain-Machine Interfaces: Beyond Decoding

A brain-machine interface (BMI) is a system that enables users to interact with computers and robots through the voluntary modulation of their brain activity. Such a BMI is particularly relevant as an aid for patients with severe neuromuscular disabilities, although it also opens up new possibilities in human-machine interaction for able-bodied people. Real-time signal processing and decoding of brain signals are certainly at the heart of a BMI. Yet, this does not suffice for subjects to operate a brain-controlled device. In the first part of my talk I will review some of our recent studies, most involving participants with severe motor disabilities, that illustrate additional principles of a reliable BMI that enable users to operate different devices. In particular, I will show how an exclusive focus on machine learning is not necessarily the solution as it may not promote subject learning. This highlights the need for a comprehensive mutual learning methodology that foster learning at the three critical levels of the machine, subject and application. To further illustrate that BMI is more than just decoding, I will discuss how to enhance subject learning and BMI performance through appropriate feedback modalities. Finally, I will show how these principles translate to motor rehabilitation, where in a controlled trial chronic stroke patients achieved a significant functional recovery after the intervention, which was retained 6-12 months after the end of therapy.

Inclusive Basic Research

Methodology for understanding the basic phenomena of life can be done in vitro or in vivo, under tightly-controlled experimental conditions designed to limit variability. However stringent the protocol, these experiments do not occur in a cultural vacuum and they are often subject to the same societal biases as other research disciplines. Many researchers uphold the status quo of biased basic research by not questioning the characteristics of their experimental animals, or the people from whom their tissue samples were collected. This means that our fundamental understanding of life has been built on biased models. This session will explore the ways in which basic life sciences research can be biased and the implications of this. We will discuss practical ways to assess your research design and how to make sure it is representative.

Neurosexism and the brain: how gender stereotypes can distort or even damage research

The ‘Hunt the Sex Difference’ agenda has informed brain research for decades, if not centuries. This talk aims to demonstrate how a fixed belief in differences between ‘male’ and ‘female’ brains can narrow and even distort the research process. This can include the questions that are asked, the methodology selected and the analytical pipeline. It can also powerfully inform the interpretation of results and the ‘spin’ used in the public communication of such research.

Consciousness, falsification and epistemic constraints

Consciousness is a phenomenon unlike any other studied in natural science. Yet when building theories and designing experiments, we often proceed as if this were not the case. In this talk, I present two recent investigations of mine which explore the implications of consciousness' unique epistemic context for scientific theory building and experimental design. The first investigation is concerned with falsifications of theories of consciousness and identifies a rather deep problem in the usual scheme of testing theories. The second is an axiomatization and subsequent formalization of some of consciousness' more problematic epistemic features that allows to precisely quantify where the usual scientific methodology ceases to be applicable. For both cases, I indicate ways to resolve the problem.

Examining calpain activity in Spinocerebellar Ataxia-3 through use of a novel fibre photometry methodology

A Systems Biology Methodology to Drug Discovery for Neurotropic virus Infection with Clinical Corroboration