Latest
Mechanisms of Commensal- Specific CD8+ T Cell Differentiation, Restraint and Dysregulation in Intestinal Inflammation
PROJECT SUMMARY Our understanding of immunity largely stems from models of infection with pathogenic microbes. However, the vast majority of microbial-immune encounters occur as a symbiotic relationship with the commensal microbiota. Recently, the contribution of commensal-specific T cells to host physiology has received significant attention. These commensal-specific responses not only control microbiota containment but also promote immune tolerance within the gastrointestinal tract. While commensal-specific CD4+ T cell responses in the lamina propria have dominated models of mucosal immune regulation, these are vastly outnumbered by CD8+ intraepithelial lymphocytes within the epithelium. How CD8+ T cell responses to gut microbiota are primed, differentiate and function under homeostasis has not been addressed. Conversely, aberrant immunity to commensal microbes has been proposed to underlie pathologies of barrier tissues, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), where commensal-specific T cells accumulate in blood and intestinal tissues of afflicted patients. A better understanding of the properties and functions of commensal-specific T cell responses is therefore fundamental to studies of tissue immunity in health and disease. Our long term goal is to better understand how commensal-specific T cell responses contribute to barrier tissue homeostasis, and the objective in this application is to investigate the mechanisms regulating induction of commensal-specific CD8+ T cells in homeostasis and how they become dysregulated in IBD. Our rationale for the proposed work is that uncovering these mechanisms has the potential to translate into new therapeutic approaches. Our central hypothesis is that commensal-specific CD8+ T cells develop as functionally restrained intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) under homeostasis, but that perturbation of local immune regulation within the intestinal epithelium, in the case of patients with ulcerative colitis, by autoantibody-mediated blockade of integrin avb6 results in aberrant CD8+ effector T cell responses in IBD. Based on strong preliminary data, we will test three specific aims: (1) Determine key antigen-presenting cells (APC) priming SFB-specific CD8⍺β+ IEL. (2) Identify how cell-intrinsic pathways drive differentiation, maintenance and restraint of SFB-specific CD8⍺β+ pIEL. (3) Determine how pathogenic KLRG1+Eomes+ CD8+ T cells arise and contribute to inflammation in murine models of ulcerative colitis Our approach is innovative as it investigates new mechanisms of immunity unique to commensal-specific CD8+ T cell responses. The proposed work is significant because it will establish new insights into the interaction and communication between commensal microbes and immune cells in the gut environment and identify potential targets for therapeutic intervention in conditions of chronic intestinal inflammation.
Developing a novel technology for studying T cell differentiation in vivo
Summary CRISPR-based genetic screens have revolutionized our understanding of gene functions and molecular mechanisms across various biological processes. In the field of T cell biology, CRISPR screens have played a pivotal role in identifying genes that impact critical aspects, such as T cell development, differentiation, and function. However, traditional screens have struggled to distinguish genes with diverse mechanisms of action, necessitating further investigations. To address this challenge, researchers have harnessed the power of CRISPR screens combined with single-cell sequencing (scCRISPR-seq), enabling the simultaneous assessment of genetic perturbations and high-dimensional phenotypes at the single-cell level. While scCRISPR- seq has predominantly been performed in vitro using immortalized cell lines, its physiological relevance is limited due to oversimplified biological context and disparities compared to primary cells. This limitation highlights the urgent need for large-scale in vivo scCRISPR-seq with primary T cells. However, various challenges have discouraged its widespread adoption. The use of viral vectors for sgRNA delivery compromises physiological relevance, as the in vitro activation conditions fail to faithfully represent the intricate T cell priming process in vivo. Moreover, viral vector components and continuous Cas9 expression can trigger immunogenicity and cytotoxicity, leading to cell depletion and hindering long-term studies. Additionally, current scCRISPR-seq methods face technical limitations, including low editing efficiency and inadequate perturbation identity recovery rates, which impede efficient large-scale in vivo applications. Fortunately, recent advances in ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) transfection have addressed many of these challenges. This cutting-edge technology enables efficient gene editing in primary T cells without the need for in vitro activation or permanent Cas9 expression. Leveraging the high editing efficiency of RNP transfection, the investigator’s team aims to develop a novel strategy for in vivo T cell CRISPR screens. This innovative approach involves arrayed RNP transfection and co- transfer of T cells that recognize the relevant antigens. Instead of traditional genetic barcodes, the strategy utilizes congenic markers (CD45.1/45.2 and CD90.1/CD90.2) from donor TCR transgenic T cells as "external barcodes." These markers facilitate the recovery of gene perturbation identity at the single-cell level through the application of CITE-seq. Importantly, this RNP-based strategy seamlessly integrates with existing single-cell sequencing protocols, enabling the comprehensive assessment of transcripts, epitopes, and chromatin accessibility simultaneously. To demonstrate the efficacy of this strategy, the team plans to develop two benchmarking approaches: RNP-CET-seq to investigate the role of TCR regulators in T cell exhaustion and RNP-CATE-seq to map the gene regulatory atlas of exhausted CD8 T cells. In summary, the proposed RNP- based scCRISPR-seq strategy overcomes the limitations of current approaches, enabling large-scale, multi- module in vivo genetic screens within a physiologically relevant context across various disease models.
Epigenomic (re)programming of the brain and behavior by ovarian hormones
Rhythmic changes in sex hormone levels across the ovarian cycle exert powerful effects on the brain and behavior, and confer female-specific risks for neuropsychiatric conditions. In this talk, Dr. Kundakovic will discuss the role of fluctuating ovarian hormones as a critical biological factor contributing to the increased depression and anxiety risk in women. Cycling ovarian hormones drive brain and behavioral plasticity in both humans and rodents, and the talk will focus on animal studies in Dr. Kundakovic’s lab that are revealing the molecular and receptor mechanisms that underlie this female-specific brain dynamic. She will highlight the lab’s discovery of sex hormone-driven epigenetic mechanisms, namely chromatin accessibility and 3D genome changes, that dynamically regulate neuronal gene expression and brain plasticity but may also prime the (epi)genome for psychopathology. She will then describe functional studies, including hormone replacement experiments and the overexpression of an estrous cycle stage-dependent transcription factor, which provide the causal link(s) between hormone-driven chromatin dynamics and sex-specific anxiety behavior. Dr. Kundakovic will also highlight an unconventional role that chromatin dynamics may have in regulating neuronal function across the ovarian cycle, including in sex hormone-driven X chromosome plasticity and hormonally-induced epigenetic priming. In summary, these studies provide a molecular framework to understand ovarian hormone-driven brain plasticity and increased female risk for anxiety and depression, opening new avenues for sex- and gender-informed treatments for brain disorders.
How do we find what we are looking for? The Guided Search 6.0 model
The talk will give a tour of Guided Search 6.0 (GS6), the latest evolution of the Guided Search model of visual search. Part 1 describes The Mechanics of Search. Because we cannot recognize more than a few items at a time, selective attention is used to prioritize items for processing. Selective attention to an item allows its features to be bound together into a representation that can be matched to a target template in memory or rejected as a distractor. The binding and recognition of an attended object is modeled as a diffusion process taking > 150 msec/item. Since selection occurs more frequently than that, it follows that multiple items are undergoing recognition at the same time, though asynchronously, making GS6 a hybrid serial and parallel model. If a target is not found, search terminates when an accumulating quitting signal reaches a threshold. Part 2 elaborates on the five sources of Guidance that are combined into a spatial “priority map” to guide the deployment of attention (hence “guided search”). These are (1) top-down and (2) bottom-up feature guidance, (3) prior history (e.g. priming), (4) reward, and (5) scene syntax and semantics. Finally, in Part 3, we will consider the internal representation of what we are searching for; what is often called “the search template”. That search template is really two templates: a guiding template (probably in working memory) and a target template (in long term memory). Put these pieces together and you have GS6.
How do we find what we are looking for? The Guided Search 6.0 model
The talk will give a tour of Guided Search 6.0 (GS6), the latest evolution of Guided Search. Part 1 describes The Mechanics of Search. Because we cannot recognize more than a few items at a time, selective attention is used to prioritize items for processing. Selective attention to an item allows its features to be bound together into a representation that can be matched to a target template in memory or rejected as a distractor. The binding and recognition of an attended object is modeled as a diffusion process taking > 150 msec/item. Since selection occurs more frequently than that, it follows that multiple items are undergoing recognition at the same time, though asynchronously, making GS6 a hybrid serial and parallel model. If a target is not found, search terminates when an accumulating quitting signal reaches a threshold. Part 2 elaborates on the five sources of Guidance that are combined into a spatial “priority map” to guide the deployment of attention (hence “guided search”). These are (1) top-down and (2) bottom-up feature guidance, (3) prior history (e.g. priming), (4) reward, and (5) scene syntax and semantics. In GS6, the priority map is a dynamic attentional landscape that evolves over the course of search. In part, this is because the visual field is inhomogeneous. Part 3: That inhomogeneity imposes spatial constraints on search that described by three types of “functional visual field” (FVFs): (1) a resolution FVF, (2) an FVF governing exploratory eye movements, and (3) an FVF governing covert deployments of attention. Finally, in Part 4, we will consider that the internal representation of the search target, the “search template” is really two templates: a guiding template and a target template. Put these pieces together and you have GS6.
Abstraction and Analogy in Natural and Artificial Intelligence
Learning by analogy is a powerful tool children’s developmental repertoire, as well as in educational contexts such as mathematics, where the key knowledge base involves building flexible schemas. However, noticing and learning from analogies develops over time and is cognitively resource intensive. I review studies that provide insight into the relationship between mechanisms driving children’s developing analogy skills, highlighting environmental inputs (parent talk and prior experiences priming attention to relations) and neuro-cognitive factors (Executive Functions and brain injury). I then note implications for mathematics learning, reviewing experimental findings that show analogy can improve learning, but also that both individual differences in EFs and environmental factors that reduce available EFs such as performance pressure can predict student learning.
Auditory priming in freely-moving mice
Epigenetic priming underlies latent gene dysregulation in cocaine withdrawal
Functional consequences of two-phase synaptic plasticity for coding, organization, and priming of long-term memory representations
Hebbian priming of spinal mechanisms involved in motor learning
Mitochondrial priming rescues molecular, physiological and behavioral pathological outcomes in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease
Music Elicits a Priming Effect in Motor Related Areas
Priming the Brain for Chronic Pain: The Impact of Early Life Factors on Pain in Adolescence
Priming mesenchymal stem cells with α-synuclein enhances neuroprotective properties through induction of autophagy in Parkinsonian models
Priming the senses: Hunger's influence on olfaction, behaviour, and physiological responses
FENS Forum 2024
Shedding light on object location recall: Optogenetic priming of the HIP-mPFC pathway for object-location memory
FENS Forum 2024
priming coverage
16 items
Add content
Have a seminar, talk, or paper on priming? Post it so others working in this area can find it.
Post content