Animal sensory systems are optimally adapted to those features typically encountered in natural surrounds, thus allowing neurons that have a limited bandwidth to encode almost impossibly large input ranges. Importantly, natural scenes are not random, and peripheral visual systems have therefore evolved to reduce the predictable redundancy. The vertebrate visual cortex is also optimally tuned to the spatial statistics of natural scenes, but much less is known about how the insect brain responds to these. We are redressing this deficiency using several techniques. Olga Dyakova uses exquisite image manipulation to give natural images unnatural image statistics, or vice versa. Marissa Holden then uses these images as stimuli in electrophysiological recordings of neurons in the fly optic lobes, to see how the brain codes for the statistics typically encountered in natural scenes, and Olga Dyakova measures the behavioral optomotor response on our trackball set-up.

During learning, populations of neurons alter their connectivity and activity patterns, enabling the brain to construct a model of the external world. Conventional wisdom holds that the durability of a such a model is reflected in the stability of neural responses and the stability of synaptic connections that form memory engrams. However, recent experimental findings have challenged this idea, revealing that neural population activity in circuits involved in sensory perception, motor planning and spatial memory continually change over time during familiar behavioural tasks. This continual change suggests significant redundancy in neural representations, with many circuit configurations providing equivalent function. I will describe recent work that explores the consequences of such redundancy for learning and for task representation. Despite large changes in neural activity, we find cortical responses in sensorimotor tasks admit a relatively stable readout at the population level. Furthermore, we find that redundancy in circuit connectivity can make a task easier to learn and compensate for deficiencies in biological learning rules. Finally, if neuronal connections are subject to an unavoidable level of turnover, the level of plasticity required to optimally maintain a memory is generally lower than the total change due to turnover itself, predicting continual reconfiguration of an engram.

Despite the consistency of symptoms at the cognitive level, we now know that brain disorders like Autism and Schizophrenia can each arise from mutations in >100 different genes. Presumably there is a convergence of “symptoms” at the level of neural circuits in diagnosed individuals. In this talk I will argue that redundancy in neural circuit parameters implies that we should take a circuit-function rather that circuit-component approach to understanding these disorders. Then I will present our recent empirical work testing a circuit-function theory for Autism: the idea that neural circuits show excess trial-to-trial variability in response to sensory stimuli, and instability in the representations across a timescale of days. For this we analysed in vivo neural population activity data recorded from somatosensory cortex of mouse models of Fragile-X syndrome, a disorder related to autism. Work with Beatriz Mizusaki (Univ of Bristol), Nazim Kourdougli, Anand Suresh, and Carlos Portera-Cailliau (Univ of California, Los Angeles).