TopicNeuroscience
Content Overview
7Total items
4ePosters
3Seminars

Latest

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Dynamic dopaminergic signaling probabilistically controls the timing of self-timed movements

Allison Hamilos
Assad Lab, Harvard University
Feb 23, 2022

Human movement disorders and pharmacological studies have long suggested molecular dopamine modulates the pace of the internal clock. But how does the endogenous dopaminergic system influence the timing of our movements? We examined the relationship between dopaminergic signaling and the timing of reward-related, self-timed movements in mice. Animals were trained to initiate licking after a self-timed interval following a start cue; reward was delivered if the animal’s first lick fell within a rewarded window (3.3-7 s). The first-lick timing distributions exhibited the scalar property, and we leveraged the considerable variability in these distributions to determine how the activity of the dopaminergic system related to the animals’ timing. Surprisingly, dopaminergic signals ramped-up over seconds between the start-timing cue and the self-timed movement, with variable dynamics that predicted the movement/reward time, even on single trials. Steeply rising signals preceded early initiation, whereas slowly rising signals preceded later initiation. Higher baseline signals also predicted earlier self-timed movement. Optogenetic activation of dopamine neurons during self-timing did not trigger immediate movements, but rather caused systematic early-shifting of the timing distribution, whereas inhibition caused late-shifting, as if dopaminergic manipulation modulated the moment-to-moment probability of unleashing the planned movement. Consistent with this view, the dynamics of the endogenous dopaminergic signals quantitatively predicted the moment-by-moment probability of movement initiation. We conclude that ramping dopaminergic signals, potentially encoding dynamic reward expectation, probabilistically modulate the moment-by-moment decision of when to move. (Based on work from Hamilos et al., eLife, 2021).

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

NaV Long-term Inactivation Regulates Adaptation in Place Cells and Depolarization Block in Dopamine Neurons

Carmen Canavier
LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans
Feb 9, 2022

In behaving rodents, CA1 pyramidal neurons receive spatially-tuned depolarizing synaptic input while traversing a specific location within an environment called its place. Midbrain dopamine neurons participate in reinforcement learning, and bursts of action potentials riding a depolarizing wave of synaptic input signal rewards and reward expectation. Interestingly, slice electrophysiology in vitro shows that both types of cells exhibit a pronounced reduction in firing rate (adaptation) and even cessation of firing during sustained depolarization. We included a five state Markov model of NaV1.6 (for CA1) and NaV1.2 (for dopamine neurons) respectively, in computational models of these two types of neurons. Our simulations suggest that long-term inactivation of this channel is responsible for the adaptation in CA1 pyramidal neurons, in response to triangular depolarizing current ramps. We also show that the differential contribution of slow inactivation in two subpopulations of midbrain dopamine neurons can account for their different dynamic ranges, as assessed by their responses to similar depolarizing ramps. These results suggest long-term inactivation of the sodium channel is a general mechanism for adaptation.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Neural codes in early sensory areas maximize fitness

Todd Hare
University of Zürich
May 13, 2021

It has generally been presumed that sensory information encoded by a nervous system should be as accurate as its biological limitations allow. However, perhaps counter intuitively, accurate representations of sensory signals do not necessarily maximize the organism’s chances of survival. We show that neural codes that maximize reward expectation—and not accurate sensory representations—account for retinal responses in insects, and retinotopically-specific adaptive codes in humans. Thus, our results provide evidence that fitness-maximizing rules imposed by the environment are applied at the earliest stages of sensory processing.

ePosterNeuroscience

Counterfactual outcomes affect reward expectation and prediction errors in macaque frontal cortex

Jan Grohn,Caroline Jahn,Mark Walton,Sebastien Bouret,Jerome Sallet,Nils Kolling

COSYNE 2022

ePosterNeuroscience

Complementary coding of movement, reward expectation and outcome in the cerebellum and Basal Ganglia

Noga Larry, Gil Zur, Mati Joshua
ePosterNeuroscience

Global neuronal population dynamics reflect action-mediated reward expectation

Yangfan Peng, Carl Lindersson, Sasha Tinelli, Jeffery Stedehouder, Charlotte Stagg, Armin Lak, Andrew Sharott

FENS Forum 2024

ePosterNeuroscience

Reward expectation modulates neuronal dynamics and network organization in premotor cortex

Valentina Giuffrida, Isabel Beatrice Marc, Giampiero Bardella, Stefano Ferraina, Pierpaolo Pani

FENS Forum 2024

reward expectation coverage

7 items

ePoster4
Seminar3

Share your knowledge

Know something about reward expectation? Help the community by contributing seminars, talks, or research.

Contribute content
Domain spotlight

Explore how reward expectation research is advancing inside Neuroscience.

Visit domain

Cookies

We use essential cookies to run the site. Analytics cookies are optional and help us improve World Wide. Learn more.